Skip to content

doc: describe modeling steps #60

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
dacoex opened this issue Apr 25, 2015 · 3 comments
Open

doc: describe modeling steps #60

dacoex opened this issue Apr 25, 2015 · 3 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@dacoex
Copy link
Contributor

dacoex commented Apr 25, 2015

Just to catch your options:

Would the documentation benefit from having a section, mapping the functionality against the typical modelling steps outlined in:
https://pvpmc.sandia.gov/modeling-steps/
https://pvpmc.sandia.gov/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/1199X499_slide2.png

If so, I would embark (slowly) on that.
It would help me and maybe others to understand the library.

Additionally, this would show where functionality is still lacking.

OK, this would be similar to
PV_LIB Version 1_2 Release/html/html/pvlib_functions_by_cat.html
But a bit more semantic and linked.

@wholmgren
Copy link
Member

Better linking to PVPMC would be very helpful, but we should avoid duplicating their effort. Better ipython notebook tutorials should be a priority too (see #30). I think we can make the equivalent of pvlib_functions_by_cat.html by modifying the sphinx scripts.

Would be happy to see some PRs for documentation.

@wholmgren wholmgren added this to the Someday milestone Apr 27, 2015
@dacoex
Copy link
Contributor Author

dacoex commented Apr 28, 2015

I think we can make the equivalent of pvlib_functions_by_cat.html by modifying the sphinx scripts.

OK. that's it. I will have a look at this someday ;-)

@dacoex
Copy link
Contributor Author

dacoex commented Jan 25, 2016

I think the following will solve this:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants