Skip to content

0.12.0 release #2776

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
shoyer opened this issue Feb 19, 2019 · 10 comments
Closed

0.12.0 release #2776

shoyer opened this issue Feb 19, 2019 · 10 comments

Comments

@shoyer
Copy link
Member

shoyer commented Feb 19, 2019

We have quite a few nice new features merged into master.

Is anything holding up making a 0.12 release shortly?

cc @pydata/xarray

@dcherian
Copy link
Contributor

#2759 looks ready and complements all the cftime stuff.

#2769 seems like a nice bugfix to merge.

Otherwise lgtm.

@spencerkclark
Copy link
Member

I think #2721 looks ready too, and @jwenfai and @tlogan2000 would probably appreciate it if we merged it in time for the 0.12 release (sorry for letting that sit for a couple weeks).

@Zac-HD
Copy link
Contributor

Zac-HD commented Feb 20, 2019

I'd love to get #2777 merged - it's a small patch, but really useful in a remote sensing niche.

My students are going to be graded on how well their figures are labelled, and I really don't want to have to teach them matplotlib 😅

@TomNicholas
Copy link
Member

Potentially completing #2616 would start the deprecation cycle for auto_combine etc? I would need at least a few days to do that though...

@shoyer
Copy link
Member Author

shoyer commented Mar 12, 2019

I'm going to cherry-pick 63da214 and then try to get a release out.

We can start the deprecation cycle for auto-combine later.

@shoyer
Copy link
Member Author

shoyer commented Mar 12, 2019

I guess we should probably fix and/or remove the failing test in #2803, too.

@max-sixty
Copy link
Collaborator

(I have let some of my PRs stay almost-finished. I will endeavor to follow my own advice and complete soon. Thanks for everyone's patience)

@shoyer
Copy link
Member Author

shoyer commented Mar 14, 2019

Any objections to pushing back finalizing deprecations currently marked for 0.12? See #2809

I'm a little concerned that most of these changes (introduced in 0.11) haven't been around long enough to safely finalize the deprecations.

@shoyer
Copy link
Member Author

shoyer commented Mar 16, 2019

I finally tagged the 0.12 release... probably should have done this a while ago!

@shoyer shoyer closed this as completed Mar 16, 2019
@jhamman
Copy link
Member

jhamman commented Mar 17, 2019

Thanks @shoyer. I merged the conda-forge build about an hour ago.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants