diff --git a/Doc/library/dataclasses.rst b/Doc/library/dataclasses.rst
index 85a7d9026d1d30..310c3ea77b1d1c 100644
--- a/Doc/library/dataclasses.rst
+++ b/Doc/library/dataclasses.rst
@@ -468,6 +468,30 @@ Module contents
      def is_dataclass_instance(obj):
          return is_dataclass(obj) and not isinstance(obj, type)
 
+.. class:: DataclassLike
+
+   An abstract base class for all dataclasses. Mainly useful for type-checking.
+
+   All classes created using the :func:`@dataclass <dataclass>` decorator are
+   considered subclasses of this class; all dataclass instances are considered
+   instances of this class:
+
+      >>> from dataclasses import dataclass, DataclassLike
+      >>> @dataclass
+      ... class Foo:
+      ...     x: int
+      ...
+      >>> issubclass(Foo, DataclassLike)
+      True
+      >>> isinstance(Foo(42), DataclassLike)
+      True
+
+   ``DataclassLike`` is an abstract class that cannot be instantiated. It is
+   also a "final" class that cannot be subclassed: use the
+   :func:`@dataclass <dataclass>` decorator to create new dataclasses.
+
+   .. versionadded:: 3.12
+
 .. data:: MISSING
 
    A sentinel value signifying a missing default or default_factory.
diff --git a/Lib/dataclasses.py b/Lib/dataclasses.py
index a73cdc22a5f4b3..27755f9353c550 100644
--- a/Lib/dataclasses.py
+++ b/Lib/dataclasses.py
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
            'make_dataclass',
            'replace',
            'is_dataclass',
+           'DataclassLike',
            ]
 
 # Conditions for adding methods.  The boxes indicate what action the
@@ -1294,6 +1295,26 @@ def is_dataclass(obj):
     return hasattr(cls, _FIELDS)
 
 
+@dataclass(init=False, repr=False, eq=False, match_args=False)
+class DataclassLike(metaclass=abc.ABCMeta):
+    """Abstract base class for all dataclass types.
+
+    Mainly useful for type-checking.
+    """
+    def __init_subclass__(cls):
+        raise TypeError(
+            "Use the @dataclass decorator to create dataclasses, "
+            "rather than subclassing dataclasses.DataclassLike"
+        )
+
+    def __new__(cls):
+        raise TypeError(
+            "dataclasses.DataclassLike is an abstract class that cannot be instantiated"
+        )
+
+    __subclasshook__ = is_dataclass
+
+
 def asdict(obj, *, dict_factory=dict):
     """Return the fields of a dataclass instance as a new dictionary mapping
     field names to field values.
diff --git a/Lib/test/test_dataclasses.py b/Lib/test/test_dataclasses.py
index 7dd81a8855f1be..19c8e2b3434e65 100644
--- a/Lib/test/test_dataclasses.py
+++ b/Lib/test/test_dataclasses.py
@@ -1522,6 +1522,63 @@ class A(types.GenericAlias):
         self.assertTrue(is_dataclass(type(a)))
         self.assertTrue(is_dataclass(a))
 
+    def test_DataclassLike(self):
+        # As an abstract base class for all dataclasses,
+        # it makes sense for DataclassLike to also be considered a dataclass
+        self.assertTrue(is_dataclass(DataclassLike))
+        self.assertTrue(issubclass(DataclassLike, DataclassLike))
+
+        with self.assertRaises(TypeError):
+            DataclassLike()
+
+        with self.assertRaises(TypeError):
+            class Foo(DataclassLike): pass
+
+        @dataclass
+        class Dataclass:
+            x: int
+
+        self.assertTrue(issubclass(Dataclass, DataclassLike))
+        self.assertIsInstance(Dataclass(42), DataclassLike)
+
+        with self.assertRaises(TypeError):
+            issubclass(Dataclass(42), DataclassLike)
+
+        class NotADataclass:
+            def __init__(self):
+                self.x = 42
+
+        self.assertFalse(issubclass(NotADataclass, DataclassLike))
+        self.assertNotIsInstance(NotADataclass(), DataclassLike)
+
+        class NotADataclassButDataclassLike:
+            """A class from an outside library (attrs?) with dataclass-like behaviour"""
+            __dataclass_fields__ = {}
+
+        self.assertTrue(issubclass(NotADataclassButDataclassLike, DataclassLike))
+        self.assertIsInstance(NotADataclassButDataclassLike(), DataclassLike)
+
+        class HasInstanceDataclassFieldsAttribute:
+            def __init__(self):
+                self.__dataclass_fields__ = {}
+
+        self.assertFalse(issubclass(HasInstanceDataclassFieldsAttribute, DataclassLike))
+        self.assertNotIsInstance(HasInstanceDataclassFieldsAttribute(), DataclassLike)
+
+        class HasAllAttributes:
+            def __getattr__(self, name):
+                return {}
+
+        self.assertFalse(issubclass(HasAllAttributes, DataclassLike))
+        self.assertNotIsInstance(HasAllAttributes(), DataclassLike)
+
+        @dataclass
+        class GenericAliasSubclass(types.GenericAlias):
+            origin: type
+            args: type
+
+        self.assertTrue(issubclass(GenericAliasSubclass, DataclassLike))
+        self.assertIsInstance(GenericAliasSubclass(int, str), DataclassLike)
 
     def test_helper_fields_with_class_instance(self):
         # Check that we can call fields() on either a class or instance,
diff --git a/Misc/NEWS.d/next/Library/2023-03-22-21-05-34.gh-issue-102699.48uE4z.rst b/Misc/NEWS.d/next/Library/2023-03-22-21-05-34.gh-issue-102699.48uE4z.rst
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000000..a6e4d242d28ef3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Misc/NEWS.d/next/Library/2023-03-22-21-05-34.gh-issue-102699.48uE4z.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+Add :class:`dataclasses.DataclassLike`, an abstract base class for all
+dataclasses. Patch by Alex Waygood.