Skip to content

Failed to resize output tensor for XNNExecutor. CALL_DELEGATE execute failed at instruction 6: 0x10 #9749

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
guangy10 opened this issue Mar 28, 2025 · 2 comments
Closed

Failed to resize output tensor for XNNExecutor. CALL_DELEGATE execute failed at instruction 6: 0x10 #9749

guangy10 opened this issue Mar 28, 2025 · 2 comments
Assignees
@mcr229
Labels
module: xnnpack Issues related to xnnpack delegation and the code under backends/xnnpack/
Milestone
0.6.0

Comments

@guangy10
Copy link
Contributor

guangy10 commented Mar 28, 2025 •
edited by pytorch-bot bot
Loading

🐛 Describe the bug

Failed to resize output tensor for XNNExecutor. CALL_DELEGATE execute failed at instruction 6: 0x10. Seeing this error in efficientnet model.

The model is exported statically, and the shapes of export inputs and test inputs are identical.

@mcr229 already have fix for this issue here: #9729

Versions

trunk and release/0.6

cc @digantdesai @mcr229 @cbilgin
@guangy10 guangy10 added the module: xnnpack Issues related to xnnpack delegation and the code under backends/xnnpack/ label Mar 28, 2025
@mcr229
Copy link
Contributor

mcr229 commented Mar 31, 2025

closed with this: #9729

@mcr229 mcr229 closed this as completed Mar 31, 2025
@guangy10
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mcr229 Cherry-pick to 0.6?

@mergennachin mergennachin added this to the 0.6.0 milestone Apr 7, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@mcr229 mcr229

Labels
module: xnnpack Issues related to xnnpack delegation and the code under backends/xnnpack/
Projects
None yet
Milestone
0.6.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@mergennachin @mcr229 @guangy10