diff --git a/text/0000-decorators.md b/text/0000-decorators.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..741950c8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/text/0000-decorators.md
@@ -0,0 +1,155 @@
+- Start Date: 2018-02-21
+- RFC PR: (leave this empty)
+- React Issue: (leave this empty)
+
+# Summary
+
+This is a WIP RFC to discuss how we can develop the React ecosystem with the upcoming ECMA262 feature "Decorators".
+
+[Decorators](https://github.com/tc39/proposal-decorators) is an ECMA262 proposal at stage 2 and yet to be standardised.
+
+**Please note that decorators proposal have been through breaking changes. Please read the current version if you were unaware: [Link to Decorators Proposal](https://github.com/tc39/proposal-decorators)**
+
+While it's not yet a standard, how they could be used in React ecosystem should be discussed for benefit of the React community and the standardisation process.
+
+Just like React uses JSX at its core, it could also make use of another language future, decorators to enable better development experiences.
+
+# Examples
+
+## React Use: Component Flags
+
+Instead of extending a separate class or nesting components for flagging a component, decorators can be used:
+```javascript
+// Before:
+export default class MyComponent extends React.PureComponent {
+  return (
+    <AsyncMode>
+      {/* ... */}
+    </AsyncMode>
+  )
+}
+
+// After:
+@React.pure
+@React.async
+export default class MyComponent extends React.Component {}
+```
+
+## React Use: Refs
+
+A field decorator can be implemented to allow easier use of Refs:
+```javascript
+class MyComponent extends Component {
+  @React.ref
+  myTextInput;
+
+  myMethod = () => {
+    foo(this.myTextInput.value);
+  }
+
+  render() {
+    return (
+      <TextInput ref={this.refs.myTextInput} />
+    )
+  }
+}
+```
+
+## Community Use: HOCs
+
+Many libraries like Redux and Relay provide additional Props to Components. They do this by wrapping the Component in another Component. Class decorators can be used to simplify consumption.
+
+```javascript
+// Before:
+import { withRouter, connect } from './hocs';
+
+class MyComponent extends Component { /* ... */ }
+
+const MyComponentWithRouter = withRouter(MyComponent);
+
+export default connect(/* ... */)(MyComponentWithRouter);
+
+// After
+import { withRouter, connect } from './hocs';
+
+@withRouter
+@connect(/* ... */)
+export default class MyComponent extends Component { /* ... */ }
+```
+
+## Community Use: Providing Mock Data
+
+A decorator can be implemented for attaching mock data to a Component to help out-of-context rendering:
+
+```javascript
+type Props = {
+  showDetails: string, // From Redux
+  user: User, // From Relay
+}
+
+@MyLib.mock({
+  showDetails: false,
+  user: MyLib.fakeUser,
+})
+class MyComponent { /* ... */ }
+```
+
+Out-of-context rendering enabled by using such a decorator can allow design tools (like Facebook Origami and Adobe XD) or IDEs (like Atom and VSCode) to work on individual files.
+
+# END OF DOCUMENT, THE REST WILL BE FILLED LATER
+
+# Motivation
+
+Why are we doing this? What use cases does it support? What is the expected
+outcome?
+
+Please focus on explaining the motivation so that if this RFC is not accepted,
+the motivation could be used to develop alternative solutions. In other words,
+enumerate the constraints you are trying to solve without coupling them too
+closely to the solution you have in mind.
+
+# Detailed design
+
+This is the bulk of the RFC. Explain the design in enough detail for somebody
+familiar with React to understand, and for somebody familiar with the
+implementation to implement. This should get into specifics and corner-cases,
+and include examples of how the feature is used. Any new terminology should be
+defined here.
+
+# Drawbacks
+
+Why should we *not* do this? Please consider:
+
+- implementation cost, both in term of code size and complexity
+- whether the proposed feature can be implemented in user space
+- the impact on teaching people React
+- integration of this feature with other existing and planned features
+- cost of migrating existing React applications (is it a breaking change?)
+
+There are tradeoffs to choosing any path. Attempt to identify them here.
+
+# Alternatives
+
+What other designs have been considered? What is the impact of not doing this?
+
+# Adoption strategy
+
+If we implement this proposal, how will existing React developers adopt it? Is
+this a breaking change? Can we write a codemod? Should we coordinate with
+other projects or libraries?
+
+# How we teach this
+
+What names and terminology work best for these concepts and why? How is this
+idea best presented? As a continuation of existing React patterns?
+
+Would the acceptance of this proposal mean the React documentation must be
+re-organized or altered? Does it change how React is taught to new developers
+at any level?
+
+How should this feature be taught to existing React developers?
+
+# Unresolved questions
+
+Optional, but suggested for first drafts. What parts of the design are still
+TBD?