Skip to content

Template in mdpi_template is outdated #369

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
3 tasks done
JVAQUEROM opened this issue Jan 26, 2021 · 3 comments · Fixed by #515
Closed
3 tasks done

Template in mdpi_template is outdated #369

JVAQUEROM opened this issue Jan 26, 2021 · 3 comments · Fixed by #515
Labels
feature a feature request or enhancement

Comments

@JVAQUEROM
Copy link

I just wanted to report that mdpi_journal template is outdated. New mdpi.cls does not include \history{}, for example, and now it consists of three commands: \datereceived{}, \dateaccepted{} and \datepublished{}. Some other small details may have changed too, but I do not think this is a big update. I installed the last version of rticles:

> xfun::session_info('rticles')
R version 4.0.3 (2020-10-10)
Platform: x86_64-suse-linux-gnu (64-bit)
Running under: openSUSE Leap 15.2, RStudio 1.3.1073

Locale:
  LC_CTYPE=es_ES.UTF-8       LC_NUMERIC=C               LC_TIME=es_ES.UTF-8       
  LC_COLLATE=es_ES.UTF-8     LC_MONETARY=es_ES.UTF-8    LC_MESSAGES=es_ES.UTF-8   
  LC_PAPER=es_ES.UTF-8       LC_NAME=C                  LC_ADDRESS=C              
  LC_TELEPHONE=C             LC_MEASUREMENT=es_ES.UTF-8 LC_IDENTIFICATION=C       

Package version:
  base64enc_0.1.4   digest_0.6.27     evaluate_0.14     glue_1.4.2       
  graphics_4.0.3    grDevices_4.0.3   highr_0.8         htmltools_0.5.1.1
  jsonlite_1.7.2    knitr_1.30        magrittr_2.0.1    markdown_1.1     
  methods_4.0.3     mime_0.9          Rcpp_1.0.6        rlang_0.4.10     
  rmarkdown_2.6.6   rticles_0.18.3    stats_4.0.3       stringi_1.5.3    
  stringr_1.4.0     tinytex_0.29.1    tools_4.0.3       utils_4.0.3      
  xfun_0.20         yaml_2.2.1       

Best regards.


By filing an issue to this repo, I promise that

  • I have fully read the issue guide at https://yihui.name/issue/.
  • I have provided the necessary information about my issue.
    • If I'm asking a question, I have already asked it on Stack Overflow or RStudio Community, waited for at least 24 hours, and included a link to my question there.
    • If I'm filing a bug report, I have included a minimal, self-contained, and reproducible example, and have also included xfun::session_info('rticles'). I have upgraded all my packages to their latest versions (e.g., R, RStudio, and R packages), and also tried the development version: remotes::install_github('rstudio/rticles').
    • If I have posted the same issue elsewhere, I have also mentioned it in this issue.
  • I have learned the Github Markdown syntax, and formatted my issue correctly.

I understand that my issue may be closed if I don't fulfill my promises.

@cderv
Copy link
Collaborator

cderv commented Jan 26, 2021

Thanks for the update @JVAQUEROM !

Would you like to open a PR to update this template ?

pinging @dleutnant who contributed the template initially.

@JVAQUEROM
Copy link
Author

Yes, I'll try to update it when I have some spare time.

I wish in the future publishers provide a Rmd template themselves...

Thank you for this awesome idea for scientific writing

@mrajeev08 mrajeev08 mentioned this issue Apr 6, 2021
1 task
@cderv cderv added feature a feature request or enhancement and removed enhancement labels Jul 19, 2021
@cderv cderv linked a pull request Apr 17, 2023 that will close this issue
12 tasks
@github-actions
Copy link

This old thread has been automatically locked. If you think you have found something related to this, please open a new issue by following the issue guide (https://yihui.org/issue/), and link to this old issue if necessary.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 23, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
feature a feature request or enhancement
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants