1
1
# Checking conditional configurations
2
2
3
- ` rustc ` accepts the ` --check-cfg ` option, which specifies whether to check conditions and how to
4
- check them. The ` --check-cfg ` option takes a value, called the _ check cfg specification_ .
5
- This specification has one form:
3
+ ` rustc ` supports checking that every _ reachable_ [ ^ reachable ] ` #[cfg] ` matches a list of the
4
+ expected config names and values.
6
5
7
- 1 . ` --check-cfg cfg(...) ` mark a configuration and it's expected values as expected.
6
+ This can help with verifying that the crate is correctly handling conditional compilation for
7
+ different target platforms or features. It ensures that the cfg settings are consistent between
8
+ what is intended and what is used, helping to catch potential bugs or errors early in the
9
+ development process.
8
10
9
- * No implicit expectation is added when using ` --cfg ` . Users are expected to
10
- pass all expected names and values using the _ check cfg specification _ . *
11
+ In order to accomplish that goal, ` rustc ` accepts the ` --check- cfg ` flag, which specifies
12
+ whether to check conditions and how to check them.
11
13
12
- ## The ` cfg(...) ` form
14
+ > ** Note:** No implicit expectation is added when using ` --cfg ` . Users are expected to
15
+ pass all expected names and values using the _ check cfg specification_ .
13
16
14
- The ` cfg(...) ` form enables checking the values within list-valued conditions. It has this
15
- basic form:
17
+ [ ^ reachable ] : ` rustc ` promises to at least check reachable ` #[cfg] ` , and while non-reachable
18
+ ` #[cfg] ` are not currently checked, they may well be checked in the future without it being a
19
+ breaking change.
20
+
21
+ ## Specifying expected names and values
22
+
23
+ To specify expected names and values, the _ check cfg specification_ provides the ` cfg(...) `
24
+ option which enables specifying for an expected config name and it's expected values.
25
+
26
+ It has this basic form:
16
27
17
28
``` bash
18
29
rustc --check-cfg ' cfg(name, values("value1", "value2", ... "valueN"))'
19
30
```
20
31
21
32
where ` name ` is a bare identifier (has no quotes) and each ` "value" ` term is a quoted literal
22
33
string. ` name ` specifies the name of the condition, such as ` feature ` or ` my_cfg ` .
34
+ ` "value" ` specify one of the value of that condition name.
35
+
36
+ When the ` cfg(...) ` option is specified, ` rustc ` will check every[ ^ reachable ] :
37
+ - ` #[cfg(name = "value")] ` attribute
38
+ - ` #[cfg_attr(name = "value")] ` attribute
39
+ - ` #[link(name = "a", cfg(name = "value"))] ` attribute
40
+ - ` cfg!(name = "value") ` macro call
23
41
24
- When the ` cfg(...) ` option is specified, ` rustc ` will check every ` #[cfg(name = "value")] `
25
- attribute, ` #[cfg_attr(name = "value")] ` attribute, ` #[link(name = "a", cfg(name = "value"))] `
26
- attribute and ` cfg!(name = "value") ` macro call. It will check that the ` "value" ` specified is
27
- present in the list of expected values. If ` "value" ` is not in it, then ` rustc ` will report an
28
- ` unexpected_cfgs ` lint diagnostic. The default diagnostic level for this lint is ` Warn ` .
42
+ > * The command line ` --cfg ` arguments are currently NOT checked but may very well be checked
43
+ in the future.*
29
44
30
- * The command line ` --cfg ` arguments are currently * NOT* checked but may very well be checked in
31
- the future.*
45
+ ` rustc ` will check that the ` "value" ` specified is present in the list of expected values.
46
+ If ` "value" ` is not in it, then ` rustc ` will report an ` unexpected_cfgs ` lint diagnostic.
47
+ The default diagnostic level for this lint is ` Warn ` .
32
48
33
49
To check for the _ none_ value (ie ` #[cfg(foo)] ` ) one can use the ` none() ` predicate inside
34
50
` values() ` : ` values(none()) ` . It can be followed or preceded by any number of ` "value" ` .
@@ -43,12 +59,12 @@ rustc --check-cfg 'cfg(name, values(none()))'
43
59
44
60
To enable checking of name but not values, use one of these forms:
45
61
46
- - No expected values (_ will lint on every value _ ):
62
+ - No expected values (_ will lint on every value of ` name ` _ ):
47
63
``` bash
48
64
rustc --check-cfg ' cfg(name, values())'
49
65
```
50
66
51
- - Unknown expected values (_will never lint_ ):
67
+ - Unknown expected values (_will never lint on value of ` name ` _ ):
52
68
` ` ` bash
53
69
rustc --check-cfg ' cfg(name, values(any()))'
54
70
` ` `
@@ -59,17 +75,26 @@ To avoid repeating the same set of values, use this form:
59
75
rustc --check-cfg ' cfg(name1, ..., nameN, values("value1", "value2", ... "valueN"))'
60
76
` ` `
61
77
78
+ To enable checking without specifying any names or values, use this form:
79
+
80
+ ` ` ` bash
81
+ rustc --check-cfg ' cfg()'
82
+ ` ` `
83
+
62
84
The ` --check-cfg cfg(...)` option can be repeated, both for the same condition name and for
63
85
different names. If it is repeated for the same condition name, then the sets of values for that
64
86
condition are merged together (precedence is given to `values(any ())` ).
65
87
88
+ > To help out an equivalence table between ` --cfg` arguments and ` --check-cfg` is available
89
+ [down below](# equivalence-table-with---cfg).
90
+
66
91
# # Well known names and values
67
92
68
- ` rustc` has a internal list of well known names and their corresponding values.
69
- Those well known names and values follows the same stability as what they refer to .
93
+ ` rustc` maintains a list of well- known names and their corresponding values in order to avoid
94
+ the need to specify them manually .
70
95
71
- Well known names and values checking is always enabled as long as at least one
72
- ` --check-cfg ` argument is present.
96
+ Well known names and values are implicitly added as long as at least one ` --check-cfg ` argument
97
+ is present.
73
98
74
99
As of ` 2024-04-06T` , the list of known names is as follows:
75
100
@@ -108,11 +133,9 @@ As of `2024-04-06T`, the list of known names is as follows:
108
133
Like with `values(any ())` , well known names checking can be disabled by passing ` cfg(any())`
109
134
as argument to ` --check-cfg` .
110
135
111
- # # Examples
112
-
113
- # ## Equivalence table
136
+ # # Equivalence table with `--cfg`
114
137
115
- This table describe the equivalence of a ` --cfg` argument to a ` --check-cfg` argument.
138
+ This table describe the equivalence between a ` --cfg` argument to a ` --check-cfg` argument.
116
139
117
140
| ` --cfg` | ` --check-cfg` |
118
141
| -------------------------------| ------------------------------------------------------------|
@@ -124,40 +147,42 @@ This table describe the equivalence of a `--cfg` argument to a `--check-cfg` arg
124
147
| ` --cfg foo=" 1" --cfg bar=" 2" ` | ` --check-cfg=cfg(foo, values(" 1" )) --check-cfg=cfg(bar, values(" 2" ))` |
125
148
| ` --cfg foo --cfg foo=" bar" ` | ` --check-cfg=cfg(foo, values(none (), " bar" ))` |
126
149
150
+ # # Examples
151
+
127
152
# ## Example: Cargo-like `feature` example
128
153
129
154
Consider this command line:
130
155
131
156
` ` ` bash
132
157
rustc --check-cfg ' cfg(feature, values("lion", "zebra"))' \
133
- --cfg ' feature="lion"' -Z unstable-options example.rs
158
+ --cfg ' feature="lion"' example.rs
134
159
` ` `
135
160
136
- This command line indicates that this crate has two features: ` lion` and ` zebra` . The ` lion`
161
+ > This command line indicates that this crate has two features: ` lion` and ` zebra` . The ` lion`
137
162
feature is enabled, while the ` zebra` feature is disabled.
138
- Given the ` --check-cfg` arguments, exhaustive checking of names and
139
- values are enabled.
140
163
141
- ` example.rs` :
142
164
` ` ` rust
143
- # [cfg(feature = "lion")] // This condition is expected, as "lion" is an expected value of `feature`
165
+ # [cfg(feature = "lion")] // This condition is expected, as "lion" is an
166
+ // expected value of ` feature`
144
167
fn tame_lion(lion: Lion) {}
145
168
146
- # [cfg(feature = "zebra")] // This condition is expected, as "zebra" is an expected value of `feature`
147
- // but the condition will still evaluate to false
148
- // since only --cfg feature=" lion" was passed
169
+ # [cfg(feature = "zebra")] // This condition is expected, as "zebra" is an expected
170
+ // value of ` feature ` but the condition will evaluate
171
+ // to false since only --cfg feature=" lion" was passed
149
172
fn ride_zebra(z: Zebra) {}
150
173
151
- # [cfg(feature = "platypus")] // This condition is UNEXPECTED, as "platypus" is NOT an expected value of
152
- // ` feature` and will cause a compiler warning (by default).
174
+ # [cfg(feature = "platypus")] // This condition is UNEXPECTED, as "platypus" is NOT
175
+ // an expected value of ` feature` and will cause a
176
+ // the compiler to emit the ` unexpected_cfgs` lint
153
177
fn poke_platypus () {}
154
178
155
- # [cfg(feechure = "lion")] // This condition is UNEXPECTED, as 'feechure' is NOT a expected condition
156
- // name, no ` cfg(feechure, ...)` was passed in ` --check-cfg`
179
+ # [cfg(feechure = "lion")] // This condition is UNEXPECTED, as 'feechure' is NOT
180
+ // a expected condition name, no ` cfg(feechure, ...)`
181
+ // was passed in ` --check-cfg`
157
182
fn tame_lion () {}
158
183
159
- # [cfg(windows = "unix")] // This condition is UNEXPECTED, as while 'windows' is a well known
160
- // condition name, it doesn' t expect any values
184
+ # [cfg(windows = "unix")] // This condition is UNEXPECTED, as the well known
185
+ // ' windows ' cfg doesn' t expect any values
161
186
fn tame_windows() {}
162
187
```
163
188
@@ -166,50 +191,54 @@ fn tame_windows() {}
166
191
```bash
167
192
rustc --check-cfg ' cfg(is_embedded, has_feathers)' \
168
193
--check-cfg ' cfg(feature, values(" zapping" , " lasers" ))' \
169
- --cfg has_feathers --cfg ' feature=" zapping" ' -Z unstable-options
194
+ --cfg has_feathers --cfg ' feature=" zapping" '
170
195
```
171
196
172
197
```rust
173
- #[cfg(is_embedded)] // This condition is expected, as ' is_embedded' was provided in --check-cfg
174
- fn do_embedded() {} // and doesn' t take any value
198
+ #[cfg(is_embedded)] // This condition is expected, as ' is_embedded' was
199
+ // provided in --check-cfg and doesn' t take any value
200
+ fn do_embedded () {}
175
201
176
- # [cfg(has_feathers)] // This condition is expected, as 'has_feathers' was provided in --check-cfg
177
- fn do_features () {} // and doesn' t take any value
202
+ # [cfg(has_feathers)] // This condition is expected, as 'has_feathers' was
203
+ // provided in --check-cfg and doesn' t take any value
204
+ fn do_features() {}
178
205
179
- #[cfg(has_mumble_frotz)] // This condition is UNEXPECTED, as ' has_mumble_frotz' was NEVER provided
180
- // in any --check-cfg arguments
206
+ #[cfg(has_mumble_frotz)] // This condition is UNEXPECTED, as ' has_mumble_frotz'
207
+ // was NEVER provided in any --check-cfg arguments
181
208
fn do_mumble_frotz() {}
182
209
183
- #[cfg(feature = "lasers")] // This condition is expected, as "lasers" is an expected value of `feature`
210
+ #[cfg(feature = "lasers")] // This condition is expected, as "lasers" is an
211
+ // expected value of `feature`
184
212
fn shoot_lasers() {}
185
213
186
- #[cfg(feature = "monkeys")] // This condition is UNEXPECTED, as "monkeys" is NOT an expected value of
187
- // `feature`
214
+ #[cfg(feature = "monkeys")] // This condition is UNEXPECTED, as "monkeys" is NOT
215
+ // an expected value of `feature`
188
216
fn write_shakespeare() {}
189
217
```
190
218
191
219
### Example: Condition names without values
192
220
193
221
```bash
194
222
rustc --check-cfg ' cfg(is_embedded, has_feathers, values(any ()))' \
195
- --cfg has_feathers -Z unstable-options
223
+ --cfg has_feathers
196
224
```
197
225
198
226
```rust
199
- #[cfg(is_embedded)] // This condition is expected, as ' is_embedded' was provided in --check-cfg
200
- // as condition name
227
+ #[cfg(is_embedded)] // This condition is expected, as ' is_embedded' was
228
+ // provided in --check-cfg as condition name
201
229
fn do_embedded() {}
202
230
203
- #[cfg(has_feathers)] // This condition is expected, as "has_feathers" was provided in --check-cfg
204
- // as condition name
231
+ #[cfg(has_feathers)] // This condition is expected, as "has_feathers" was
232
+ // provided in --check-cfg as condition name
205
233
fn do_features() {}
206
234
207
- #[cfg(has_feathers = "zapping")] // This condition is expected, as "has_feathers" was provided in
208
- // and because *any* values is expected for ' has_feathers' no
235
+ #[cfg(has_feathers = "zapping")] // This condition is expected, as "has_feathers"
236
+ // was provided and because *any* values is
237
+ // expected for ' has_feathers' no
209
238
// warning is emitted for the value "zapping"
210
239
fn do_zapping() {}
211
240
212
- #[cfg(has_mumble_frotz)] // This condition is UNEXPECTED, as ' has_mumble_frotz' was not provided
213
- // in any --check-cfg arguments
241
+ #[cfg(has_mumble_frotz)] // This condition is UNEXPECTED, as ' has_mumble_frotz'
242
+ // was not provided in any --check-cfg arguments
214
243
fn do_mumble_frotz() {}
215
244
```
0 commit comments