no_global_oom_handling is so annoying :(

Author: scottmcm

library/alloc/src/vec/into_iter.rs

@@ -11,7 +11,9 @@ use core::iter::{
     TrustedRandomAccessNoCoerce,
 };
 use core::marker::PhantomData;
-use core::mem::{ManuallyDrop, SizedTypeProperties};
+use core::mem::ManuallyDrop;
+#[cfg(not(no_global_oom_handling))]
+use core::mem::SizedTypeProperties;
 use core::num::NonZero;
 #[cfg(not(no_global_oom_handling))]
 use core::ops::Deref;
@@ -128,6 +130,7 @@ impl<T, A: Allocator> IntoIter<T, A> {
     }
 
     /// Forgets to Drop the remaining elements while still allowing the backing allocation to be freed.
+    #[cfg(not(no_global_oom_handling))]
     pub(crate) fn forget_remaining_elements(&mut self) {
         self.drain.forget_remaining();
     }

library/alloc/src/vec/mod.rs

@@ -64,9 +64,7 @@ use core::marker::PhantomData;
 use core::mem::{self, ManuallyDrop, MaybeUninit, SizedTypeProperties};
 use core::ops::{self, Index, IndexMut, Range, RangeBounds};
 use core::ptr::{self, NonNull};
-#[cfg(not(no_global_oom_handling))]
-use core::slice::DrainRaw;
-use core::slice::{self, SliceIndex};
+use core::slice::{self, DrainRaw, SliceIndex};
 
 use crate::alloc::{Allocator, Global};
 use crate::borrow::{Cow, ToOwned};