You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The same issue exists both in SBT and at compile time. Essentially by instantiating a class containing a dependent type through the use of dependent types, that type is lost. If, instead the same object is created directly, the type information is preserved.
It is similar to #5700 with one exception, an explicit type is given always.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I put together a gist which demonstrates the issue: https://gist.github.com/wheaties/7192b40b76cb99e79127
The same issue exists both in SBT and at compile time. Essentially by instantiating a class containing a dependent type through the use of dependent types, that type is lost. If, instead the same object is created directly, the type information is preserved.
It is similar to #5700 with one exception, an explicit type is given always.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: