-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 325
Gitter vs Discord #1256
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
https://www.scala-lang.org/community/ does have the Discord links — just not right at the top. (Are there also Gitter links elsewhere...?) I think a pull request that increased the visibility of Discord on the community page would not be controversial. But in order to replace the Gitter links entirely, it would have to be decided at the org level that Discord is now our flagship chat platform. I don't believe that decision is made yet. (One notable holdout is @smarter, but I don't know how strong his opposition is.) The discussion of record on this subject is https://users.scala-lang.org/t/can-we-have-an-official-scala-discord-server/5157 If Discord does become our flagship chat platform (I'm now in favor of that, after long holding a cautious/skeptical attitude about it), I think we should shut down all of our Gitter rooms, in order not to unnecessarily fragment the community. There will be a certain amount of opposition, but you can't please all the people all the time. |
I don't plan to join discord (I have a PhD thesis to write and enough distractions as is), but I'm not against people using it. |
"I believe it is now time for the Scala org to shut down its Gitter rooms and standardize on Discord" — me, this morning, at https://users.scala-lang.org/t/can-we-have-an-official-scala-discord-server/5157/59?u=sethtisue |
@vincenzobaz I hope the Center will have an internal discussion about this? maybe after y'all Europeans aren't on your long vacations anymore :-) |
Hi @SethTisue,
💯 |
@julienrf I want to make 100% sure that we understand each other, though: I am not merely suggesting alterations to the community page. I am suggesting actually shutting down the scala/* Gitter rooms. and I wouldn't do that without a very clear go-ahead from the Center (and after any discussion on the Discourse thread has died down, and if the tenor of the discussion, which so far is generally in favor of the switch, hasn't changed) do I have that go-ahead? (note that any shutdown wouldn't need to be immediate; we could announce a shutdown; remove any mention of Gitter from the community page; leave the Gitter rooms open for a while to help people find Discord instead; and then eventually, actually close the rooms.) |
For the record, I like Discord less than Gitter, and I don't think the fragmentation matters as long as which one to go first is clearly indicated from the web site. Having a hardly-used Gitter site hasn't seemed to harm the Rust community at all. If it were up to me, I'd leave Gitter up until the only things posting there were tumbleweeds. But I also don't think it matters all that much, so I'll grudgingly go along with whatever. |
fwiw, I wouldn't mind leaving scala/scala itself around, as long as moderation problems (either spam or CoC) don't develop. (I still look in on #scala on IRC daily even though it's 99% crickets.) Mild preference to shut it down, but I don't really care either way. It's mainly the other rooms I actually do want to see shut down:
|
Yes. |
I think we should just move officially to Discord now, no point having 2 chat rooms. In fact pointing users towards Gitter isn't without cost. I think it leaves a bad impression, that Scala isn't keeping up with the times. |
PR: #1312 |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
The website links to gitter channels.
In the meanwhile Discord channels were open.
Should we consider replacing Gitter links to discord or at least adding the discord links?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: