KVM: x86: pull kvm->srcu read-side to kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run

kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run is already doing srcu_read_lock/unlock in two
places, namely vcpu_run and post_kvm_run_save, and a third is actually
needed around the call to vcpu->arch.complete_userspace_io to avoid
the following splat:

  WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
  arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c:190 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!
  other info that might help us debug this:
  rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1
  1 lock held by CPU 28/KVM/370841:
  #0: ff11004089f280b8 (&vcpu->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x87/0x730 [kvm]
  Call Trace:
   <TASK>
   dump_stack_lvl+0x59/0x73
   reprogram_fixed_counter+0x15d/0x1a0 [kvm]
   kvm_pmu_trigger_event+0x1a3/0x260 [kvm]
   ? free_moved_vector+0x1b4/0x1e0
   complete_fast_pio_in+0x8a/0xd0 [kvm]

This splat is not at all unexpected, since complete_userspace_io
callbacks can execute similar code to vmexits.  For example, SVM
with nrips=false will call into the emulator from
svm_skip_emulated_instruction().

Reported-by: Like Xu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <[email protected]>

Author: bonzini

arch/x86/kvm/x86.c

@@ -9180,6 +9180,7 @@ static int dm_request_for_irq_injection(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		likely(!pic_in_kernel(vcpu->kvm));
 }
 
+/* Called within kvm->srcu read side.  */
 static void post_kvm_run_save(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	struct kvm_run *kvm_run = vcpu->run;
@@ -9188,16 +9189,9 @@ static void post_kvm_run_save(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	kvm_run->cr8 = kvm_get_cr8(vcpu);
 	kvm_run->apic_base = kvm_get_apic_base(vcpu);
 
-	/*
-	 * The call to kvm_ready_for_interrupt_injection() may end up in
-	 * kvm_xen_has_interrupt() which may require the srcu lock to be
-	 * held, to protect against changes in the vcpu_info address.
-	 */
-	vcpu->srcu_idx = srcu_read_lock(&vcpu->kvm->srcu);
 	kvm_run->ready_for_interrupt_injection =
 		pic_in_kernel(vcpu->kvm) ||
 		kvm_vcpu_ready_for_interrupt_injection(vcpu);
-	srcu_read_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->srcu, vcpu->srcu_idx);
 
 	if (is_smm(vcpu))
 		kvm_run->flags |= KVM_RUN_X86_SMM;
@@ -9815,6 +9809,7 @@ void __kvm_request_immediate_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__kvm_request_immediate_exit);
 
 /*
+ * Called within kvm->srcu read side.
  * Returns 1 to let vcpu_run() continue the guest execution loop without
  * exiting to the userspace.  Otherwise, the value will be returned to the
  * userspace.
@@ -10193,6 +10188,7 @@ static int vcpu_enter_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	return r;
 }
 
+/* Called within kvm->srcu read side.  */
 static inline int vcpu_block(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	bool hv_timer;
@@ -10252,12 +10248,12 @@ static inline bool kvm_vcpu_running(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		!vcpu->arch.apf.halted);
 }
 
+/* Called within kvm->srcu read side.  */
 static int vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	int r;
 	struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm;
 
-	vcpu->srcu_idx = srcu_read_lock(&kvm->srcu);
 	vcpu->arch.l1tf_flush_l1d = true;
 
 	for (;;) {
@@ -10291,8 +10287,6 @@ static int vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		}
 	}
 
-	srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->srcu, vcpu->srcu_idx);
-
 	return r;
 }
 
@@ -10398,13 +10392,15 @@ static void kvm_put_guest_fpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	struct kvm_run *kvm_run = vcpu->run;
+	struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm;
 	int r;
 
 	vcpu_load(vcpu);
 	kvm_sigset_activate(vcpu);
 	kvm_run->flags = 0;
 	kvm_load_guest_fpu(vcpu);
 
+	vcpu->srcu_idx = srcu_read_lock(&vcpu->kvm->srcu);
 	if (unlikely(vcpu->arch.mp_state == KVM_MP_STATE_UNINITIALIZED)) {
 		if (kvm_run->immediate_exit) {
 			r = -EINTR;
@@ -10475,8 +10471,9 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	if (kvm_run->kvm_valid_regs)
 		store_regs(vcpu);
 	post_kvm_run_save(vcpu);
-	kvm_sigset_deactivate(vcpu);
+	srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->srcu, vcpu->srcu_idx);
 
+	kvm_sigset_deactivate(vcpu);
 	vcpu_put(vcpu);
 	return r;
 }