-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6k
Multi-tenancy for Reactive Resource Server #6727
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
@jzheaux Can I work on this? |
Yes, sir, it's yours! |
Hi @jzheaux Started working on this and 6723 issues and it would be helpful to get some direction from your end. Looking through your PR PR 6563
I have read a few articles and Spring blogs on Thank you for your usual support 🙂 Raf. |
Yes, that's correct. We haven't broken things out yet just because there hasn't yet been the need.
Actually, there isn't a special filter on the reactive side. The programming model is a bit more simplified on the reactive side. You can see the filter set up just as an
Nothing for the time being - thanks for asking
This may sound silly, but I'm a lot more of a learn-by-doing person, so I haven't read much more than the Project Reactor docs. But let me ask the team, and I'll get back to you. |
Related to #5351.
Let's add the reactive equivalent of Resource Server's multi-tenancy support.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: