Simpler untrack call

[ghost]

Describe the problem

I found that I am using the following pattern frequently:

$effect(() => {
	data;
	untrack(() => {
		if (chart) {
			chart.data = data;
			chart.option = "some other derived runes";
			chart.update();
		}
	});
});

So data is a derived rune and used as a signal to trigger the execution of code inside of untrack block.
Inside of the untrack, there might be other state or derived runes that I do not want to track and trigger the code.

Describe the proposed solution

I would like to see if this is possible to save me from typing some extra layers of brackets:

$effect.untrack((data) => {
	if (chart) {
		chart.data = data;
		chart.option = "some other derived runes";
		chart.update();
	}
});

If the above code does not follow Javascript syntax, would this be possible?

$effect.untrack(data, () => {
	if (chart) {
		chart.data = data;
		chart.option = "some other derived runes";
		chart.update();
	}
});

My goal here is to segregate signal runes and untracked code block to avoid typing an extra ( ) => { } block.

Can we put data into the input field, or multiple runes into the input field and use these input args as trigger signals to call the untrack block?

Importance

would make my life easier

[harrisi]

Duplicate of #9248.