Skip to content

#68 add example for slots and scoped slots #71

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Aug 8, 2019

Conversation

mb200
Copy link

@mb200 mb200 commented Aug 8, 2019

For #68. Adds a simple Card component and test that asserts slot and scopedSlot content.

Copy link
Member

@afontcu afontcu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added a small suggestion, but looks great overall! 👍

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 8, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #71 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@          Coverage Diff          @@
##           master    #71   +/-   ##
=====================================
  Coverage     100%   100%           
=====================================
  Files           1      1           
  Lines          61     61           
  Branches       10     10           
=====================================
  Hits           61     61

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 09bad0c...b84b782. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Member

@afontcu afontcu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great! Thank you very much for this

@afontcu afontcu merged commit fc9a3d9 into testing-library:master Aug 8, 2019
This was referenced Aug 8, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants