We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
From #231 and discussion at TPAC, are we agreed on the current text of the specifications (syntax and api at least) that in 9.1:
To avoid forward-compatibility issues, a term SHOULD NOT start with an @ character as future versions of JSON-LD may introduce additional keywords.
The discussion around @direction led to some unexpected (to the participants) results about when the processor would complain and when it would.
@direction
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Closing in favour of reopened #16
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
From #231 and discussion at TPAC, are we agreed on the current text of the specifications (syntax and api at least) that in 9.1:
The discussion around
@direction
led to some unexpected (to the participants) results about when the processor would complain and when it would.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: