-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 358
Manage snapshots thread safety issue 2409 #2431
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
ForeverAngry
wants to merge
4
commits into
apache:main
Choose a base branch
from
ForeverAngry:manage-snapshots-thread-safety-issue-2409
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
1af9a94
Build: Refactor ManageSnapshots to ensure thread safety and add unit …
ForeverAngry a3292f6
Build: Enhance type annotations in ManageSnapshots tests for better c…
ForeverAngry 30e9897
chore: Renamed the test file
ForeverAngry be33fb4
Build: Initialize _updates and _requirements attributes in ManageSnap…
ForeverAngry File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,365 @@ | ||
# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one | ||
# or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file | ||
# distributed with this work for additional information | ||
# regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file | ||
# to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the | ||
# "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance | ||
# with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at | ||
# | ||
# http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 | ||
# | ||
# Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, | ||
# software distributed under the License is distributed on an | ||
# "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY | ||
# KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the | ||
# specific language governing permissions and limitations | ||
# under the License. | ||
import threading | ||
import uuid | ||
from typing import Any, Dict, List | ||
from unittest.mock import Mock | ||
from uuid import uuid4 | ||
|
||
from pyiceberg.table.update.snapshot import ManageSnapshots | ||
|
||
|
||
def test_manage_snapshots_thread_safety_fix() -> None: | ||
"""Test that ManageSnapshots instances have isolated state.""" | ||
# Create two mock transactions (representing different tables) | ||
transaction1 = Mock() | ||
transaction2 = Mock() | ||
|
||
# Create two ManageSnapshots instances | ||
manage1 = ManageSnapshots(transaction1) | ||
manage2 = ManageSnapshots(transaction2) | ||
|
||
# Note: Empty tuples () are singletons in Python, so we need to test with actual content | ||
# Mock the transaction method that would normally be called | ||
transaction1._set_ref_snapshot = Mock(return_value=(("update1",), ("req1",))) | ||
transaction2._set_ref_snapshot = Mock(return_value=(("update2",), ("req2",))) | ||
|
||
# Make different changes to each instance | ||
manage1.create_tag(snapshot_id=1001, tag_name="tag1") | ||
manage2.create_tag(snapshot_id=2001, tag_name="tag2") | ||
|
||
# NOW verify they have separate update tuples (this proves the fix works!) | ||
# Before fix: both would have the same content due to shared class attributes | ||
# After fix: they should have different content because they have separate instance attributes | ||
assert id(manage1._updates) != id(manage2._updates), ( | ||
"ManageSnapshots instances are sharing the same _updates tuple - thread safety bug still exists" | ||
) | ||
|
||
assert id(manage1._requirements) != id(manage2._requirements), ( | ||
"ManageSnapshots instances are sharing the same _requirements tuple - thread safety bug still exists" | ||
) | ||
|
||
# Verify no cross-contamination of updates | ||
assert manage1._updates != manage2._updates, "Updates are contaminated between instances" | ||
assert manage1._requirements != manage2._requirements, "Requirements are contaminated between instances" | ||
|
||
# Verify each instance has its expected content | ||
assert manage1._updates == ("update1",), f"manage1 should have ('update1',), got {manage1._updates}" | ||
assert manage2._updates == ("update2",), f"manage2 should have ('update2',), got {manage2._updates}" | ||
|
||
|
||
def test_manage_snapshots_concurrent_operations() -> None: | ||
"""Test concurrent operations with separate ManageSnapshots instances.""" | ||
results: Dict[str, tuple[Any, ...]] = {"manage1_updates": (), "manage2_updates": ()} | ||
|
||
def worker1() -> None: | ||
transaction1 = Mock() | ||
transaction1._set_ref_snapshot = Mock(return_value=(("update1",), ("req1",))) | ||
manage1 = ManageSnapshots(transaction1) | ||
manage1.create_tag(snapshot_id=1001, tag_name="tag1") | ||
results["manage1_updates"] = manage1._updates | ||
|
||
def worker2() -> None: | ||
transaction2 = Mock() | ||
transaction2._set_ref_snapshot = Mock(return_value=(("update2",), ("req2",))) | ||
manage2 = ManageSnapshots(transaction2) | ||
manage2.create_tag(snapshot_id=2001, tag_name="tag2") | ||
results["manage2_updates"] = manage2._updates | ||
|
||
# Run both workers concurrently | ||
thread1 = threading.Thread(target=worker1) | ||
thread2 = threading.Thread(target=worker2) | ||
|
||
thread1.start() | ||
thread2.start() | ||
|
||
thread1.join() | ||
thread2.join() | ||
|
||
# Check for cross-contamination | ||
expected_1 = ("update1",) | ||
expected_2 = ("update2",) | ||
|
||
assert results["manage1_updates"] == expected_1, "Worker 1 updates contaminated" | ||
assert results["manage2_updates"] == expected_2, "Worker 2 updates contaminated" | ||
|
||
|
||
def test_manage_snapshots_concurrent_different_tables() -> None: | ||
"""Test that concurrent ManageSnapshots operations on DIFFERENT tables work correctly. | ||
|
||
This test validates the thread safety fix by ensuring that concurrent | ||
operations on different table objects properly isolate their updates and requirements. | ||
""" | ||
# Create two mock tables with different configurations | ||
table1 = Mock() | ||
table1.metadata = Mock() | ||
table1.metadata.table_uuid = uuid4() | ||
|
||
table2 = Mock() | ||
table2.metadata = Mock() | ||
table2.metadata.table_uuid = uuid4() | ||
|
||
# Track calls to each table's manage operations | ||
table1_operations: List[Dict[str, Any]] = [] | ||
table2_operations: List[Dict[str, Any]] = [] | ||
|
||
def create_table1_manage_mock() -> ManageSnapshots: | ||
transaction_mock = Mock() | ||
|
||
def set_ref_snapshot_side_effect(**kwargs: Any) -> tuple[tuple[str, ...], tuple[str, ...]]: | ||
table1_operations.append(kwargs) | ||
return (("table1_update",), ("table1_req",)) | ||
|
||
transaction_mock._set_ref_snapshot = Mock(side_effect=set_ref_snapshot_side_effect) | ||
manage_mock = ManageSnapshots(transaction_mock) | ||
manage_mock.commit = Mock(return_value=None) # type: ignore[method-assign] | ||
return manage_mock | ||
|
||
def create_table2_manage_mock() -> ManageSnapshots: | ||
transaction_mock = Mock() | ||
|
||
def set_ref_snapshot_side_effect(**kwargs: Any) -> tuple[tuple[str, ...], tuple[str, ...]]: | ||
table2_operations.append(kwargs) | ||
return (("table2_update",), ("table2_req",)) | ||
|
||
transaction_mock._set_ref_snapshot = Mock(side_effect=set_ref_snapshot_side_effect) | ||
manage_mock = ManageSnapshots(transaction_mock) | ||
manage_mock.commit = Mock(return_value=None) # type: ignore[method-assign] | ||
return manage_mock | ||
|
||
table1.manage_snapshots = Mock(side_effect=create_table1_manage_mock) | ||
table2.manage_snapshots = Mock(side_effect=create_table2_manage_mock) | ||
|
||
# Define different snapshot IDs and operations for each table | ||
table1_snapshot_id = 1001 | ||
table2_snapshot_id = 2001 | ||
|
||
def manage_table_snapshots(table_obj: Any, table_name: str, snapshot_id: int, tag_name: str, results: Dict[str, Any]) -> None: | ||
"""Manage snapshots for a specific table.""" | ||
try: | ||
# Create tag operation (as in real usage) | ||
table_obj.manage_snapshots().create_tag(snapshot_id=snapshot_id, tag_name=tag_name).commit() | ||
|
||
results["success"] = True | ||
results["snapshot_id"] = snapshot_id | ||
results["tag_name"] = tag_name | ||
|
||
except Exception as e: | ||
results["success"] = False | ||
results["error"] = str(e) | ||
|
||
results1: Dict[str, Any] = {} | ||
results2: Dict[str, Any] = {} | ||
|
||
# Create threads to manage snapshots for different tables concurrently | ||
thread1 = threading.Thread(target=manage_table_snapshots, args=(table1, "table1", table1_snapshot_id, "tag1", results1)) | ||
thread2 = threading.Thread(target=manage_table_snapshots, args=(table2, "table2", table2_snapshot_id, "tag2", results2)) | ||
|
||
# Start threads concurrently | ||
thread1.start() | ||
thread2.start() | ||
|
||
# Wait for completion | ||
thread1.join() | ||
thread2.join() | ||
|
||
# Check results - both should succeed if thread safety is correct | ||
assert results1.get("success", False), f"Table1 management failed: {results1.get('error', 'Unknown error')}" | ||
assert results2.get("success", False), f"Table2 management failed: {results2.get('error', 'Unknown error')}" | ||
|
||
# CRITICAL: Verify that each table only received its own operations | ||
# This is the key test - if the bug exists, operations will cross-contaminate | ||
assert len(table1_operations) == 1, f"Table1 should have 1 operation, got {len(table1_operations)}" | ||
assert len(table2_operations) == 1, f"Table2 should have 1 operation, got {len(table2_operations)}" | ||
|
||
# Verify the operations contain the correct snapshot IDs | ||
assert table1_operations[0]["snapshot_id"] == table1_snapshot_id, "Table1 received wrong snapshot ID" | ||
assert table2_operations[0]["snapshot_id"] == table2_snapshot_id, "Table2 received wrong snapshot ID" | ||
|
||
# Verify tag names are correct | ||
assert table1_operations[0]["ref_name"] == "tag1", "Table1 received wrong tag name" | ||
assert table2_operations[0]["ref_name"] == "tag2", "Table2 received wrong tag name" | ||
|
||
|
||
def test_manage_snapshots_cross_table_isolation() -> None: | ||
"""Test that verifies operations don't get mixed up between different tables. | ||
|
||
This test validates the fix by ensuring that concurrent | ||
operations on different table objects properly isolate their updates and requirements. | ||
""" | ||
|
||
# Create two mock table objects to simulate real usage | ||
table1 = Mock() | ||
table1.metadata = Mock() | ||
table1.metadata.table_uuid = uuid.uuid4() | ||
|
||
table2 = Mock() | ||
table2.metadata = Mock() | ||
table2.metadata.table_uuid = uuid.uuid4() | ||
|
||
# Track which operations each table's manage operation receives | ||
table1_manage_calls: List[Dict[str, Any]] = [] | ||
table2_manage_calls: List[Dict[str, Any]] = [] | ||
|
||
def mock_table1_manage() -> ManageSnapshots: | ||
transaction_mock = Mock() | ||
|
||
def set_ref_side_effect(**kwargs: Any) -> tuple[tuple[str, ...], tuple[str, ...]]: | ||
table1_manage_calls.append(kwargs) | ||
return (("update1",), ("req1",)) | ||
|
||
transaction_mock._set_ref_snapshot = Mock(side_effect=set_ref_side_effect) | ||
manage_mock = ManageSnapshots(transaction_mock) | ||
manage_mock.commit = Mock(return_value=None) # type: ignore[method-assign] | ||
return manage_mock | ||
|
||
def mock_table2_manage() -> ManageSnapshots: | ||
transaction_mock = Mock() | ||
|
||
def set_ref_side_effect(**kwargs: Any) -> tuple[tuple[str, ...], tuple[str, ...]]: | ||
table2_manage_calls.append(kwargs) | ||
return (("update2",), ("req2",)) | ||
|
||
transaction_mock._set_ref_snapshot = Mock(side_effect=set_ref_side_effect) | ||
manage_mock = ManageSnapshots(transaction_mock) | ||
manage_mock.commit = Mock(return_value=None) # type: ignore[method-assign] | ||
return manage_mock | ||
|
||
table1.manage_snapshots = Mock(side_effect=mock_table1_manage) | ||
table2.manage_snapshots = Mock(side_effect=mock_table2_manage) | ||
|
||
def manage_from_table(table: Any, table_name: str, operations: List[Dict[str, Any]], results: Dict[str, Any]) -> None: | ||
"""Perform multiple manage operations on a specific table.""" | ||
try: | ||
for op in operations: | ||
manager = table.manage_snapshots() | ||
if op["type"] == "tag": | ||
manager.create_tag(snapshot_id=op["snapshot_id"], tag_name=op["name"]).commit() | ||
elif op["type"] == "branch": | ||
manager.create_branch(snapshot_id=op["snapshot_id"], branch_name=op["name"]).commit() | ||
|
||
results["success"] = True | ||
results["operations"] = operations | ||
except Exception as e: | ||
results["success"] = False | ||
results["error"] = str(e) | ||
|
||
# Prepare different operations for each table | ||
table1_operations = [ | ||
{"type": "tag", "snapshot_id": 1001, "name": "tag1"}, | ||
{"type": "branch", "snapshot_id": 1002, "name": "branch1"}, | ||
] | ||
table2_operations = [ | ||
{"type": "tag", "snapshot_id": 2001, "name": "tag2"}, | ||
{"type": "branch", "snapshot_id": 2002, "name": "branch2"}, | ||
] | ||
|
||
results1: Dict[str, Any] = {} | ||
results2: Dict[str, Any] = {} | ||
|
||
# Run concurrent management operations | ||
thread1 = threading.Thread(target=manage_from_table, args=(table1, "table1", table1_operations, results1)) | ||
thread2 = threading.Thread(target=manage_from_table, args=(table2, "table2", table2_operations, results2)) | ||
|
||
thread1.start() | ||
thread2.start() | ||
thread1.join() | ||
thread2.join() | ||
|
||
# CRITICAL ASSERTION: Each table should only receive its own operations | ||
# If this fails, it means the thread safety bug exists | ||
|
||
# Table1 should only see table1 operations | ||
table1_snapshot_ids = [call["snapshot_id"] for call in table1_manage_calls] | ||
expected_table1_ids = [1001, 1002] | ||
|
||
assert table1_snapshot_ids == expected_table1_ids, ( | ||
f"Table1 received unexpected snapshot IDs: {table1_snapshot_ids} (expected {expected_table1_ids})" | ||
) | ||
|
||
# Table2 should only see table2 operations | ||
table2_snapshot_ids = [call["snapshot_id"] for call in table2_manage_calls] | ||
expected_table2_ids = [2001, 2002] | ||
|
||
assert table2_snapshot_ids == expected_table2_ids, ( | ||
f"Table2 received unexpected snapshot IDs: {table2_snapshot_ids} (expected {expected_table2_ids})" | ||
) | ||
|
||
# Verify no cross-contamination | ||
table1_received_table2_ids = [sid for sid in table1_snapshot_ids if sid in expected_table2_ids] | ||
table2_received_table1_ids = [sid for sid in table2_snapshot_ids if sid in expected_table1_ids] | ||
|
||
assert len(table1_received_table2_ids) == 0, f"Table1 incorrectly received Table2 snapshot IDs: {table1_received_table2_ids}" | ||
|
||
assert len(table2_received_table1_ids) == 0, f"Table2 incorrectly received Table1 snapshot IDs: {table2_received_table1_ids}" | ||
|
||
|
||
def test_manage_snapshots_concurrent_same_table_different_operations() -> None: | ||
"""Test that concurrent ManageSnapshots operations work correctly.""" | ||
|
||
# Mock current snapshot ID | ||
current_snapshot_id = 12345 | ||
|
||
# Create mock transactions that return the expected format | ||
def create_mock_transaction() -> Mock: | ||
transaction_mock = Mock() | ||
transaction_mock._set_ref_snapshot = Mock(return_value=(("update",), ("req",))) | ||
return transaction_mock | ||
|
||
def manage_snapshots_thread_func(operations: List[Dict[str, Any]], results: Dict[str, Any]) -> None: | ||
"""Function to run in a thread that performs manage snapshot operations and captures results.""" | ||
try: | ||
for op in operations: | ||
transaction = create_mock_transaction() | ||
manager = ManageSnapshots(transaction) | ||
if op["type"] == "tag": | ||
manager.create_tag(snapshot_id=op["snapshot_id"], tag_name=op["name"]) | ||
elif op["type"] == "branch": | ||
manager.create_branch(snapshot_id=op["snapshot_id"], branch_name=op["name"]) | ||
# Verify each manager has its own state | ||
results["updates"] = manager._updates | ||
results["requirements"] = manager._requirements | ||
results["success"] = True | ||
except Exception as e: | ||
results["success"] = False | ||
results["error"] = str(e) | ||
|
||
# Define different operations for each thread | ||
operations1 = [{"type": "tag", "snapshot_id": current_snapshot_id, "name": "test_tag_1"}] | ||
operations2 = [{"type": "branch", "snapshot_id": current_snapshot_id, "name": "test_branch_2"}] | ||
|
||
# Prepare result dictionaries to capture thread outcomes | ||
results1: Dict[str, Any] = {} | ||
results2: Dict[str, Any] = {} | ||
|
||
# Create threads to perform different operations concurrently | ||
thread1 = threading.Thread(target=manage_snapshots_thread_func, args=(operations1, results1)) | ||
thread2 = threading.Thread(target=manage_snapshots_thread_func, args=(operations2, results2)) | ||
|
||
# Start and join threads | ||
thread1.start() | ||
thread2.start() | ||
thread1.join() | ||
thread2.join() | ||
|
||
# Assert that both operations succeeded | ||
assert results1.get("success", False), f"Thread 1 management failed: {results1.get('error', 'Unknown error')}" | ||
assert results2.get("success", False), f"Thread 2 management failed: {results2.get('error', 'Unknown error')}" | ||
|
||
# Verify that each thread has its own isolated state | ||
assert results1["updates"] == ("update",), f"Thread 1 should have ('update',), got {results1['updates']}" | ||
assert results2["updates"] == ("update",), f"Thread 2 should have ('update',), got {results2['updates']}" |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
(Same nit as #2430 (comment))
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@smaheshwar-pltr i applied the changes, take a look 👍