-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 221
Dockerignore: convert to whitelist #738
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: next
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from all commits
5699ebe
5061301
73630f1
3b9ddda
45a9d8c
ee8a637
aec3a92
4454222
9cfa725
40221b7
cfb13b6
9e59bcc
a6a16ac
e0baab0
a92e62a
ffd459f
db6860a
f55b0c2
89ca470
2445848
ef89f2a
4fa9f0e
ea3d17a
272c5b2
4ff3dd8
549d9ab
b15a101
7212663
b8586e8
c48dac9
bef70ae
b8aaa65
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -1,3 +1,24 @@ | ||
| node_modules | ||
| npm-debug.log | ||
| test | ||
| ** | ||
|
|
||
| # .git directories required for generating version.txt | ||
|
|
||
| !/.git/ | ||
|
Comment on lines
+3
to
+5
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I feel like we should include .gitignore files as well. Those could conceivably affect what is logged to version.txt (including whether the Git working directory is clean).
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Actually, now that I say that, if we're no longer copying all files that are committed to the repo, won't version.txt indicate that the working directory isn't clean?
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Great question. I'll investigate. Given the importance of
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I don't think PR at #1660
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Which raises the question: should local changes be reflected in
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I know I was the one to approve that PR, but I thought of it more as a general test of
I'm not 100% sure that local changes are reflected in |
||
| !/files/ | ||
|
|
||
| !/client/.browserslistrc | ||
| !/client/.git | ||
| !/client/index.html | ||
| !/client/package.json | ||
| !/client/package-lock.json | ||
| !/client/vite.config.js | ||
| !/client/public/ | ||
| !/client/src/ | ||
|
|
||
| !/server/.git | ||
| !/server/.npmrc | ||
| !/server/package.json | ||
| !/server/package-lock.json | ||
| !/server/pm2.config.js | ||
| !/server/config/ | ||
| !/server/docs/ | ||
| !/server/lib/ | ||
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.