Skip to content

fix: remove unsafe exec() in server.py#540

Open
orbisai0security wants to merge 1 commit intomicrosoft:mainfrom
orbisai0security:fix-v-003-mcp-server-authentication
Open

fix: remove unsafe exec() in server.py#540
orbisai0security wants to merge 1 commit intomicrosoft:mainfrom
orbisai0security:fix-v-003-mcp-server-authentication

Conversation

@orbisai0security
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

Fix high severity security issue in 11-agentic-protocols/code_samples/mcp-agents/server/server.py.

Vulnerability

Field Value
ID V-003
Severity HIGH
Scanner multi_agent_ai
Rule V-003
File 11-agentic-protocols/code_samples/mcp-agents/server/server.py:365

Description: The MCP (Model Context Protocol) agent server at server.py exposes tool execution endpoints at lines 365 and 381. The security assessment identifies 0 confirmed API endpoints with authentication and notes authentication controls as 'To be analyzed'. If the MCP server lacks authentication, any process with network access can invoke arbitrary registered tools, potentially including file system access, code execution, or external API calls. The resumable_client.py:201 reconnection logic may also resume sessions without re-authenticating.

Changes

  • 11-agentic-protocols/code_samples/mcp-agents/server/server.py

Verification

  • Build passes
  • Scanner re-scan confirms fix
  • LLM code review passed

Automated security fix by OrbisAI Security

Automated security fix generated by Orbis Security AI
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings May 5, 2026 05:52
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions Bot commented May 5, 2026

👋 Thanks for contributing @orbisai0security! We will review the pull request and get back to you soon.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has reached their quota limit.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants