Skip to content

build: Add linux-arm64 build #1677

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: dev
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Conversation

hallvictoria
Copy link
Contributor

@hallvictoria hallvictoria commented May 2, 2025

Description

Fixes #1643


PR information

  • The title of the PR is clear and informative.
  • There are a small number of commits, each of which has an informative message. This means that previously merged commits do not appear in the history of the PR. For information on cleaning up the commits in your pull request, see this page.
  • If applicable, the PR references the bug/issue that it fixes in the description.
  • New Unit tests were added for the changes made and CI is passing.

Quality of Code and Contribution Guidelines

@hallvictoria hallvictoria changed the title Build: Add linux-arm64 build build: Add linux-arm64 build May 2, 2025
matrix:
Python39V4:
pythonVersion: '3.9'
workerPath: 'python/prodV4/worker.py'
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you move the worker path to a variable at the top?
This was one of the comments in the proxy worker PR

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I saw that comment. Thinking on this -- the issue is that workerPath is now different for Python 3.7-3.12 and 3.13+. It's not the same across the full Python matrix, so it can't be a top-level variable. We could look at removing this variable, but it would require some refactoring, and we'd have to add an if/else statement later to set this variable properly

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we could have 2 variables. proxyworkerpath and prodworkerpath


- job: PackageWorkers
dependsOn: ['Build_WINDOWS_X64', 'Build_WINDOWS_X86', 'Build_LINUX_X64', 'Build_OSX_X64', 'Build_OSX_ARM64']
dependsOn: ['Build_WINDOWS_X64', 'Build_WINDOWS_X86', 'Build_LINUX_X64', 'Build_OSX_X64', 'Build_OSX_ARM64', 'Build_LINUX_ARM64']
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is there a Windows ARM64 arch too?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Package linux arm64
2 participants