-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 774
Remove leftover bumpfee code (RBF) #5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
deadalnix
merged 1 commit into
Bitcoin-ABC:master
from
ftrader-bitcoinabc:patch/remove_bumpfee
May 11, 2017
Merged
Remove leftover bumpfee code (RBF) #5
deadalnix
merged 1 commit into
Bitcoin-ABC:master
from
ftrader-bitcoinabc:patch/remove_bumpfee
May 11, 2017
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Once we have reviewed the change to src/wallet/wallet.cpp and are sure about it, I can remove the extra comments there and squash. |
cculianu
pushed a commit
to cculianu/bitcoin-abc
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 5, 2017
Summary: Includes: bitcoin-core/leveldb-subtree#2: Prefer std::atomic over MemoryBarrier (Pieter Wuille) bitcoin-core/leveldb-subtree#5: Move helper functions out of sse4.2 object (Cory Fields) bitcoin-core/leveldb-subtree#6: Fixes typo (Dimitris Tsapakidis) bitcoin-core/leveldb-subtree#10: Clean up compile-time warnings (gcc 7.1) (Matt Corallo) bitcoin-core/leveldb-subtree#11: fixup define checks. Cleans up some oopses from Bitcoin-ABC#5 (Cory Fields) Removes many warnings on MacOSX of the form: In file included from leveldb/util/cache.cc:10: In file included from ./leveldb/port/port.h:14: In file included from ./leveldb/port/port_posix.h:47: ./leveldb/port/atomic_pointer.h:55:3: warning: 'OSMemoryBarrier' is deprecated: first deprecated in macOS 10.12 - Use std::atomic_thread_fence() from <atomic> instead [-Wdeprecated-declarations] OSMemoryBarrier(); ^ The bitcoin core patches have been included in BU already by sickpig. Test Plan: make check. Installed and running fine. Reviewers: #bitcoin_abc, deadalnix Reviewed By: #bitcoin_abc, deadalnix Differential Revision: https://reviews.bitcoinabc.org/D584
lateminer
pushed a commit
to lateminer/bitcoin-abc
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 1, 2018
Fix errors, part 2
deadalnix
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 26, 2020
Summary: We see occasional flakiness on TSAN that gives not-so-useful output like this: ``` ==5540==WARNING: failed to fork (errno 12) ==5540==WARNING: Failed to use and restart external symbolizer! ================== WARNING: ThreadSanitizer: lock-order-inversion (potential deadlock) (pid=5540) Cycle in lock order graph: M100059481 (0x7fffa93419f8) => M100059482 (0x7fffa93419d0) => M100059481 Mutex M100059482 acquired here while holding mutex M100059481 in main thread: #0 <null> <null> (test_bitcoin+0xeacce) #1 <null> <null> (test_bitcoin+0x7b9675) #2 <null> <null> (test_bitcoin+0x7b8e8b) #3 <null> <null> (test_bitcoin+0x198299) #4 <null> <null> (libboost_unit_test_framework.so.1.67.0+0x55dbd) #5 <null> <null> (libc.so.6+0x2409a) ``` Attempts to symbolize that memory manually suggests a deadlock that is already in our suppressions file. Although clang sanitizers will default to llvm-symbolizer, it's not in our path, so it defaults to addr2line. It's not clear if addr2line can be assumed to perform as well as llvm-symbolizer. Testing both locally indicates they produce very similar output when suppressions files are not used, for instance. This patch is more of an experiment to see if llvm-symbolizer is able to correctly symbolize the above logs. If so, either the suppression will stop being flaky or we will obtain useful information to pinpoint the root cause. Test Plan: Run ASAN, TSAN, UBSAN on CI and make sure they still pass Reviewers: #bitcoin_abc, Fabien Reviewed By: #bitcoin_abc, Fabien Differential Revision: https://reviews.bitcoinabc.org/D6746
deadalnix
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 28, 2020
…Travis Summary: 1f9d5af4f197e7cc0469a0bb25dcbc51dfa537f4 tests: Add initialization order fiasco detection in Travis (practicalswift) Pull request description: Add initialization order fiasco detection in Travis :) Context: bitcoin/bitcoin#17670 (comment) This would have caught the `events_hasher` initialization order issue introduced in #17573 and fixed in #17670. Output in case of an initialization order fiasco: ``` ==7934==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: initialization-order-fiasco on address 0x557098d79200 at pc 0x55709796b9a3 bp 0x7ffde524dc30 sp 0x7ffde524dc28 READ of size 8 at 0x557098d79200 thread T0 #0 0x55709796b9a2 in CSHA256::Finalize(unsigned char*) src/crypto/sha256.cpp:667:25 #1 0x5570978150e9 in SeedEvents(CSHA512&) src/random.cpp:462:19 #2 0x5570978145e1 in SeedSlow(CSHA512&) src/random.cpp:482:5 #3 0x5570978149a3 in SeedStartup(CSHA512&, (anonymous namespace)::RNGState&) src/random.cpp:527:5 #4 0x55709781102d in ProcRand(unsigned char*, int, RNGLevel) src/random.cpp:571:9 #5 0x557097810d19 in GetRandBytes(unsigned char*, int) src/random.cpp:576:59 #6 0x557096c2f9d5 in (anonymous namespace)::CSignatureCache::CSignatureCache() src/script/sigcache.cpp:34:9 #7 0x557096511977 in __cxx_global_var_init.7 src/script/sigcache.cpp:67:24 #8 0x5570965119f8 in _GLOBAL__sub_I_sigcache.cpp src/script/sigcache.cpp #9 0x557097bba4ac in __libc_csu_init (src/bitcoind+0x18554ac) #10 0x7f214b1c2b27 in __libc_start_main /build/glibc-OTsEL5/glibc-2.27/csu/../csu/libc-start.c:266 #11 0x5570965347d9 in _start (src/bitcoind+0x1cf7d9) 0x557098d79200 is located 96 bytes inside of global variable 'events_hasher' defined in 'random.cpp:456:16' (0x557098d791a0) of size 104 registered at: #0 0x557096545dfd in __asan_register_globals compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_globals.cpp:360:3 #1 0x557097817f8b in asan.module_ctor (src/bitcoind+0x14b2f8b) SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: initialization-order-fiasco src/crypto/sha256.cpp:667:25 in CSHA256::Finalize(unsigned char*) ``` --- Backport of Core [[bitcoin/bitcoin#17674 | PR17674]] Depends on D8756 Test Plan: cmake -GNinja -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER=clang -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER=clang++ -DENABLE_SANITIZERS=address ninja all check check-functional Reviewers: #bitcoin_abc, jasonbcox Reviewed By: #bitcoin_abc, jasonbcox Differential Revision: https://reviews.bitcoinabc.org/D8757
Fabcien
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 13, 2021
Summary: See https://build.bitcoinabc.org/viewLog.html?buildId=300891&guest=1 for a tsan race while running `interface_zmq.py` ``` node0 stdout ================== WARNING: ThreadSanitizer: data race (pid=10367) Read of size 8 at 0x7b2400030238 by thread T19: #0 memcpy <null> (bitcoind+0x2645a7) #1 <null> <null> (libzmq.so.5+0x76220) Previous write of size 8 at 0x7b2400030238 by thread T12: #0 malloc <null> (bitcoind+0x258ee4) #1 <null> <null> (libzmq.so.5+0x39578) #2 CZMQAbstractPublishNotifier::SendZmqMessage(char const*, void const*, unsigned long) /work/abc-ci-builds/build-tsan/../../src/zmq/zmqpublishnotifier.cpp:164:14 (bitcoind+0xa1e7a9) ... 0 Location is heap block of size 140 at 0x7b2400030210 allocated by thread T12: #0 malloc <null> (bitcoind+0x258ee4) #1 <null> <null> (libzmq.so.5+0x39578) #2 CZMQAbstractPublishNotifier::SendZmqMessage(char const*, void const*, unsigned long) /work/abc-ci-builds/build-tsan/../../src/zmq/zmqpublishnotifier.cpp:164:14 (bitcoind+0xa1e7a9) ... Thread T19 'ZMQbg/1' (tid=10388, running) created by main thread at: #0 pthread_create <null> (bitcoind+0x25a7ab) #1 <null> <null> (libzmq.so.5+0x6e8b3) #2 CZMQNotificationInterface::Initialize() /work/abc-ci-builds/build-tsan/../../src/zmq/zmqnotificationinterface.cpp:86:23 (bitcoind+0xa199d4) #3 CZMQNotificationInterface::Create() /work/abc-ci-builds/build-tsan/../../src/zmq/zmqnotificationinterface.cpp:61:36 (bitcoind+0xa19328) #4 AppInitMain(Config&, RPCServer&, HTTPRPCRequestProcessor&, NodeContext&, interfaces::BlockAndHeaderTipInfo*) /work/abc-ci-builds/build-tsan/../../src/init.cpp:2482:36 (bitcoind+0x30d673) #5 AppInit(int, char**) /work/abc-ci-builds/build-tsan/../../src/bitcoind.cpp:181:16 (bitcoind+0x2eaa8e) #6 main /work/abc-ci-builds/build-tsan/../../src/bitcoind.cpp:208:13 (bitcoind+0x2eaa8e) Thread T12 'b-scheduler' (tid=10380, running) created by main thread at: #0 pthread_create <null> (bitcoind+0x25a7ab) #1 boost::thread::start_thread_noexcept() <null> (libboost_thread.so.1.67.0+0x1396a) #2 boost::thread::thread<std::_Bind<void (* (char const*, std::function<void ()>))(char const*, std::function<void ()>)>&>(std::_Bind<void (* (char const*, std::function<void ()>))(char const*, std::function<void ()>)>&) /usr/include/boost/thread/detail/thread.hpp:266:13 (bitcoind+0x330342) #3 boost::thread* boost::thread_group::create_thread<std::_Bind<void (* (char const*, std::function<void ()>))(char const*, std::function<void ()>)> >(std::_Bind<void (* (char const*, std::function<void ()>))(char const*, std::function<void ()>)>) /usr/include/boost/thread/detail/thread_group.hpp:79:60 (bitcoind+0x32039e) #4 AppInitMain(Config&, RPCServer&, HTTPRPCRequestProcessor&, NodeContext&, interfaces::BlockAndHeaderTipInfo*) /work/abc-ci-builds/build-tsan/../../src/init.cpp:2243:17 (bitcoind+0x309628) #5 AppInit(int, char**) /work/abc-ci-builds/build-tsan/../../src/bitcoind.cpp:181:16 (bitcoind+0x2eaa8e) #6 main /work/abc-ci-builds/build-tsan/../../src/bitcoind.cpp:208:13 (bitcoind+0x2eaa8e) #1 <null> <null> (libzmq.so.5+0x6e8b3) #2 CZMQNotificationInterface::Initialize() /work/abc-ci-builds/build-tsan/../../src/zmq/zmqnotificationinterface.cpp:86:23 (bitcoind+0xa199d4) #3 CZMQNotificationInterface::Create() /work/abc-ci-builds/build-tsan/../../src/zmq/zmqnotificationinterface.cpp:61:36 (bitcoind+0xa19328) #4 AppInitMain(Config&, RPCServer&, HTTPRPCRequestProcessor&, NodeContext&, interfaces::BlockAndHeaderTipInfo*) /work/abc-ci-builds/build-tsan/../../src/init.cpp:2482:36 (bitcoind+0x30d673) #5 AppInit(int, char**) /work/abc-ci-builds/build-tsan/../../src/bitcoind.cpp:181:16 (bitcoind+0x2eaa8e) ``` This is a backport of [[bitcoin/bitcoin#20748 | core#20748]] Test Plan: With TSAN: `for i in $(seq 100); do TSAN_OPTIONS=second_deadlock_stack=1: TSAN_OPTIONS=suppressions=/home/pierre/dev/bitcoin-abc/test/sanitizer_suppressions/tsan test/functional/test_runner.py interface_zmq; done` This failure is intermittent, but relatively easy to reproduce: I was able to get it with 10 repetitions of the test, prior to adding the suppression. Reviewers: #bitcoin_abc, Fabien Reviewed By: #bitcoin_abc, Fabien Differential Revision: https://reviews.bitcoinabc.org/D10315
imaginaryusername
pushed a commit
to bitcoin-cash-node/bitcoin-cash-node
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 10, 2024
…F_RELAY peers Co-authored-by: Calin Culianu <[email protected]> Based on commit Bitcoin-ABC#5 of: bitcoin/bitcoin#19988 Original commit: bitcoin/bitcoin@de11b0a Note we modified this commit: We adapted this commit to *not* change the 100,000 tx inv tracking limit down to 5,000, as Core did. We want to keep this backport strictly to not modifying existing behavior, and existing code allowed a 100k limit, so we keep that limit. Also, the 5k limit that Core is now using seems low and perhaps is more compatible with their chain, but for our chain, with 32x larger blocks, we should keep the limit at 100k as it was before.
johann-sys
added a commit
to johann-sys/bitcoin-abc
that referenced
this pull request
May 15, 2025
logoMainnet Explorer learn more about eCash ! block height/hash, txid, address Address ecash:qz60j37wmr0wv2k9ksz5e4qkjdzgxggg3sr98q45ug Details JSON Summary Script Public Key 76a914b4f947ced8dee62ac5b4054cd41693448321088c88ac Balance 0 Transactions 2 QR Code ecash:qz60j37wmr0wv2k9ksz5e4qkjdzgxggg3sr98q45ug Scripthash 6b7253cd13966210f51a0482486181fb036f639aa1f2fbf6ddd0daee039d4450 Is Valid? Is Script? 2 Transactions Newest First Bitcoin-ABC#2– 0357c59fffffd39cd438db127a39e88887ab818b7b9933db03ba7e44dc73a98f -552,510.39XEC 6/2, 2014 19:24 (10y, 11mo, 13d ago) > Input #0 / 0 p2pkhe4a57a901c8d13e411ad47024… #0 (addr:ecash:qz60j37wmr0wv2k9ksz5e4qkjdzgxggg3sr98q45ug 552,510.39XEC Total Input: 552,510.39XEC < Output #0 / 1 p2pkh ecash:qzgyfwdkwn9zx6h9vvl0tafupvk2drkdtg0kzut2al 204,747.39XEC < Output Bitcoin-ABC#1 / 1 p2pkh ecash:qzq4es9v7eq2wfm6rxwhpazaryes4xyedsfpjlylcd 347,763XEC Total Output: 552,510.39XEC Bitcoin-ABC#1– e4a57a901c8d13e411ad47024dcba3e04f268c99c6fc1e99f0bf14afc2e81c7f +552,510.39XEC 5/19, 2014 19:36 (10y, 11mo, 27d ago) > Input #0 / 18 p2pkh01f5cb95681c922d44ae517da… Bitcoin-ABC#1 (addr:ecash:qqc24zdvcnjhnusda0jkvrrgmkg0jnl88vg4txjsg5 0.01XEC > Input Bitcoin-ABC#1 / 18 p2pkh6e8f883eb799a9a286fe492a3… #0 (addr:ecash:qr0tjhmsrgjsf3k72xdtqv7flxq750x645z0wwxpmq 40.47XEC > Input Bitcoin-ABC#2 / 18 p2pkh901bde191beb61d2fc5bf480c… Bitcoin-ABC#1 (addr:ecash:qrjckd8ep6grzchnsv9gcdzwcpwqjazn6unlutuff9 0.01XEC > Input Bitcoin-ABC#3 / 18 p2pkh8cab265e1896f173757325295… #0 (addr:ecash:qqh24fuuud0yp5pn2q4spdh8yfwd8kskzyhtmgu8c6 53,927.28XEC > Input Bitcoin-ABC#4 / 18 p2pkhbb79adc9ad5e696ed8fe08f74… Bitcoin-ABC#1 (addr:ecash:qqe3egddd4s95glp0kczh02evv3q326pvq9r25j3jn 0.01XEC > Input Bitcoin-ABC#5 / 18 p2pkh4dacaefb3d43daed074189358… Bitcoin-ABC#1 (addr:ecash:qrrdyutsjnr5xy7fd60dgra9aw8jc5gjdy00exz55l 0.01XEC > Input Bitcoin-ABC#6 / 18 p2pkh65f5d4d7b80e0cd4d4d477b65… Bitcoin-ABC#1 (addr:ecash:qrgs5rvlxee0f4cayf9tcslzdn3h7kky95jvyljnqq 0.01XEC > Input Bitcoin-ABC#7 / 18 p2pkhf183d53245ab3a17a3278e696… #0 (addr:ecash:qrjckd8ep6grzchnsv9gcdzwcpwqjazn6unlutuff9 9,438XEC > Input Bitcoin-ABC#8 / 18 p2pkh7f6ce8e4e912b8da7da9f43ac… Bitcoin-ABC#1 (addr:ecash:qzzy34srdrgtnzqcy3adgcxh278x78mwmuya540hkx 0.01XEC > Input Bitcoin-ABC#9 / 18 p2pkh3922dd199e8901bc7dffc06fe… #0 (addr:ecash:qpycut36dx0j03us0c4l3hn9cfhyclu9e5nxxhz3dg 0.01XEC > Input Bitcoin-ABC#10 / 18 p2pkhd00af226755d2f6f78c3c213d… Bitcoin-ABC#1 (addr:ecash:qpnyhed8vzp34mtg63cxxy6cdjcsdcnazsff2sylqt 0.01XEC > Input Bitcoin-ABC#11 / 18 p2pkha04e516237bc80d3716a174e0… #0 (addr:ecash:qptuamelkkux8r5uuv8uqlzmn0ag2542fydyslz7s5 399,970XEC > Input Bitcoin-ABC#12 / 18 p2pkhd63ccab1d9b1fe1788d21d38b… Bitcoin-ABC#1 (addr:ecash:qryd3ex3zq860sqzney5guqlf5r2y8huzcy0ng8uuv 5.13XEC > Input Bitcoin-ABC#13 / 18 p2pkh0fe15b8cc74cfd189ca866132… Bitcoin-ABC#16 (addr:ecash:qrjckd8ep6grzchnsv9gcdzwcpwqjazn6unlutuff9 80XEC > Input Bitcoin-ABC#14 / 18 p2pkh679fde36f4059292df243e074… Bitcoin-ABC#1 (addr:ecash:qzuch5gavmtnl7ql53xhswquhu8jz6p7z5jfej3nam 0.01XEC > Input Bitcoin-ABC#15 / 18 p2pkha2a641d13a94a3dcc77cacaa8… Bitcoin-ABC#6 (addr:ecash:qrjckd8ep6grzchnsv9gcdzwcpwqjazn6unlutuff9 400XEC > Input Bitcoin-ABC#16 / 18 p2pkh46f3140ef52750b7c380e8f91… Bitcoin-ABC#200 (addr:ecash:qrjckd8ep6grzchnsv9gcdzwcpwqjazn6unlutuff9 20.68XEC > Input Bitcoin-ABC#17 / 18 p2pkhafa535d4b4e2345cf7fce38f9… Bitcoin-ABC#46 (addr:ecash:qrjckd8ep6grzchnsv9gcdzwcpwqjazn6unlutuff9 96.45XEC > Input Bitcoin-ABC#18 / 18 p2pkh6ab5f652b42b27703f5c1fc34… Bitcoin-ABC#1 (addr:ecash:qzrn4d90fw6029pmdn95r5wy68z4638luyv5rnl303 88,932.29XEC Total Input: 552,910.39XEC < Output #0 / 0 p2pkh ecash:qz60j37wmr0wv2k9ksz5e4qkjdzgxggg3sr98q45ug 552,510.39XEC Total Output: 552,510.39XEC hosted by bitcoinabc.org
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This removes the leftover 'bumpfee' (RBF) regtest and client code.
There is an uncertainty in the removed wallet code - one check that depends on a 'replaced_by_txid' count has been left in as that count is still calculated. This needs careful review.