Blank lines to delineate different files should not be emitted when using -NI flags

[sheisnicola]

What version of ripgrep are you using?

ripgrep 12.1.1
-SIMD -AVX (compiled)
+SIMD +AVX (runtime)

How did you install ripgrep?

Homebrew.

What operating system are you using ripgrep on?

Darwin nicolaw-aframe 19.6.0 Darwin Kernel Version 19.6.0: Mon Aug 31 22:12:52 PDT 2020; root:xnu-6153.141.2~1/RELEASE_X86_64 x86_64

Describe your bug.

Blank lines are still printed between matching when using -NI flags to surppress the printing of the filename and line numbers. If filenames and numbers are being suppressed, then the blank line to separate each file has no meaning or context so I would not expect them to be printed.

What are the steps to reproduce the behavior?

Assuming that there are multiple files in your /etc/ filesystem that contain the word host, then I would not expect any blank lines to be emitted from the following command; I would only expect to see lines that contain the word host emitted:

rg -NI host /etc

What is the actual behavior?

Blank lines are printed to delineate the results from one matching file to the next.

What is the expected behavior?

No blank lines should be emitted.

[BurntSushi]

So I actually wrote out a bug fix for this, but now I'm second guessing whether this is really a bug or not. It just seems weird to me to disable headings in this particular case, but leave them present when --no-filename is given but line numbers are displayed. I guess in my view, having that gap between different files matching might actually be desirable? Or at least, if this bug were fixed, having that gap would be impossible. But today, you can remove the heading with the --no-heading flag (or by redirecting ripgrep's output away from a tty).

I'm inclined to leave ripgrep's behavior as is.

[sheisnicola]

That's a very fair point. Perhaps this is a command line help/documentation fix then.

As it turns out my use-case does involve pumping this into a pipe, but I immediately pushed it into another grep and sort -u to "fixup" the output that I first saw come out of rg. I didn't realise change in formatting in such a situation.

I suspect that many people will have rg recommended to them by a friend or colleague like myself when performing ad-hoc command line data-mining for various purposes, and thus will start out crafting an initial rg command line like I did for its speed, and then iterate to pump it into some loop and might make the same presumptions that I did.

Apologies if this wasted your time.

Thank you for the solution!

[BurntSushi]

I see, yes. People are sometimes caught off guard by the change in formatting depending on whether ripgrep is printing to a tty or not. But even core commands do this occasionally. Compare the output of ls and ls | cat for example. It's subtle!

I'll switch this over to a documentation bug, although it's a little tricky. Maybe the tty style behavior can be mentioned more prominently in the docs. But I think we're getting close to a point where there are a few things being mentioned prominently, which of course weakens the notion of "prominent." :-/

[sheisnicola]

nods

Absolutely. Can't fault you there!

[murlakatamenka]

Wow, finding that issue wasn't easy, but that's exactly the problem I encountered.

My situation: I extract 1 field from multiple json-like files. I only need the value, so I use replace like this:

rg --no-filename --no-line-number --color=never --max-count=1 '"name"\s+"(.*)"' "*.acf" --replace '$1'

And then I get values separated with empty lines that I don't need.

It wasn't trivial to find what caused it. I tried --no-context-separator, --null, --null-data flags, searched through discussions and issues here until I found this one.

So the solution is to use --no-heading flag and it appears that empty line was an empty heading. Not complaining, but that wasn't so obvious to figure it all out :)

[BurntSushi]

@murlakatamenka Can you suggest a way to make it easier to figure out? Other than changing ripgrep's behavior (which as explained above is perhaps not such a good idea), what would have reduced the amount of time you spent tracking down the problem?

[murlakatamenka]

Ah, yes, I should've been more constructive, sorry for that.

The problem is that I failed to find out how to change it, so it's discoverability thing. You see above I tried not-so-relevant flags. I did check tab-completion to rg --no-<TAB>. I also checked man page / issues for following keywords:

• separator
• delimiter
• blank / empty line
• multiline
• multiple (meaning multiple files)

all until I found this issue and that a-ha! moment: blank line belongs to the heading, --no-heading flag is what was looked for.

I think possible solution would be add more info to help / man page.

--heading
This flag prints the file path above clusters of matches from each file instead of printing the file path
as a prefix for each matched line. This is the default mode when printing to a terminal.

Like here we don't have any mention that the heading includes that blank line - separator of clusters of matches.

---

I would say steps to reproduce the issue are:

1. I'd like to extract some data from files
2. rg <pattern>, check results in the output
3. no need for line numbers -> --no-line-numbers, cool
4. don't need filenames -> --no-filename, obviously
5. no blank lines, please -> ???, user is stuck

---

I mostly agree with what @sheisnicola wrote:

If filenames and numbers are being suppressed, then the blank line to separate each file has no meaning or context so I would not expect them to be printed.

In our use cases -NI meant "hey, rg, I don't care about source / location of the data, fetch me just it" and those blank lines weren't desirable. Guess there can be situations where you don't need this metadata but still want the clustering of matches.

---

So for now --heading help / man page can be improved. Maybe some notice of how you control output when searching through multiple files? Otherwise Interactive TAB-completion is usually enough for me to discover ripgerp's options and flags.

[markkrj]

Also, when showing colors and line numbers, there is no point in having a line break between files... It is clear enough to what file a result belongs. You can see with: rg my_search --heading --pretty | sed '/^$/d'

[murlakatamenka]

@markkrj I like empty lines between results per file, for example, so this is personal preference

[ltrzesniewski]

Since this issue is still open, I thought I'd add my 2 cents. 🙂

I was also surprised by the default behavior when I asked ripgrep to "just show me the raw matches" by adding -oNI.

It just seems weird to me to disable headings in this particular case, but leave them present when --no-filename is given but line numbers are displayed.

Actually, I was also surprised that line numbers were displayed by default when file names weren't. Line numbers don't seem to be very useful out of context (without a file name).

I guess what I really expected is for -I to be the equivalent of --no-filename --no-line-number --no-heading, but I suppose this would be too big of a change now. Anyway, having one convenient option for this would have been nice.

Or at least, if this bug were fixed, having that gap would be impossible.

Wouldn't the --heading option enable this?