6.5: mm patches #2

Rasenkai · 2023-09-23T13:03:37Z

No description provided.

What watermark boosting does is preemptively fire up kswapd to free memory when there hasn't been an allocation failure. It does this by increasing kswapd's high watermark goal and then firing up kswapd. The reason why this causes freezes is because, with the increased high watermark goal, kswapd will steal memory from processes that need it in order to make forward progress. These processes will, in turn, try to allocate memory again, which will cause kswapd to steal necessary pages from those processes again, in a positive feedback loop known as page thrashing. When page thrashing occurs, your system is essentially livelocked until the necessary forward progress can be made to stop processes from trying to continuously allocate memory and trigger kswapd to steal it back. This problem already occurs with kswapd *without* watermark boosting, but it's usually only encountered on machines with a small amount of memory and/or a slow CPU. Watermark boosting just makes the existing problem worse enough to notice on higher spec'd machines. Disable watermark boosting by default since it's a total dumpster fire. I can't imagine why anyone would want to explicitly enable it, but the option is there in case someone does. Signed-off-by: Sultan Alsawaf <[email protected]>

Keeping kswapd running when all the failed allocations that invoked it are satisfied incurs a high overhead due to unnecessary page eviction and writeback, as well as spurious VM pressure events to various registered shrinkers. When kswapd doesn't need to work to make an allocation succeed anymore, stop it prematurely to save resources. Signed-off-by: Sultan Alsawaf <[email protected]>

The page allocator wakes all kswapds in an allocation context's allowed nodemask in the slow path, so it doesn't make sense to have the kswapd- waiter count per each NUMA node. Instead, it should be a global counter to stop all kswapds when there are no failed allocation requests. Signed-off-by: Sultan Alsawaf <[email protected]>

Throttled direct reclaimers will wake up kswapd and wait for kswapd to satisfy their page allocation request, even when the failed allocation lacks the __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM flag in its gfp mask. As a result, kswapd may think that there are no waiters and thus exit prematurely, causing throttled direct reclaimers lacking __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM to stall on waiting for kswapd to wake them up. Incrementing the kswapd_waiters counter when such direct reclaimers become throttled fixes the problem. Signed-off-by: Sultan Alsawaf <[email protected]>

On-demand compaction works fine assuming that you don't have a need to spam the page allocator nonstop for large order page allocations. Signed-off-by: Sultan Alsawaf <[email protected]>

There is noticeable scheduling latency and heavy zone lock contention stemming from rmqueue_bulk's single hold of the zone lock while doing its work, as seen with the preemptoff tracer. There's no actual need for rmqueue_bulk() to hold the zone lock the entire time; it only does so for supposed efficiency. As such, we can relax the zone lock and even reschedule when IRQs are enabled in order to keep the scheduling delays and zone lock contention at bay. Forward progress is still guaranteed, as the zone lock can only be relaxed after page removal. With this change, rmqueue_bulk() no longer appears as a serious offender in the preemptoff tracer, and system latency is noticeably improved. Signed-off-by: Sultan Alsawaf <[email protected]>

Allocating pages with __get_free_page is slower than going through the slab allocator to grab free pages out from a pool. These are the results from running the code at the bottom of this message: [ 1.278602] speedtest: __get_free_page: 9 us [ 1.278606] speedtest: kmalloc: 4 us [ 1.278609] speedtest: kmem_cache_alloc: 4 us [ 1.278611] speedtest: vmalloc: 13 us kmalloc and kmem_cache_alloc (which is what kmalloc uses for common sizes behind the scenes) are the fastest choices. Use kmalloc to speed up sg list allocation. This is the code used to produce the above measurements: static int speedtest(void *data) { static const struct sched_param sched_max_rt_prio = { .sched_priority = MAX_RT_PRIO - 1 }; volatile s64 ctotal = 0, gtotal = 0, ktotal = 0, vtotal = 0; struct kmem_cache *page_pool; int i, j, trials = 1000; volatile ktime_t start; void *ptr[100]; sched_setscheduler_nocheck(current, SCHED_FIFO, &sched_max_rt_prio); page_pool = kmem_cache_create("pages", PAGE_SIZE, PAGE_SIZE, SLAB_PANIC, NULL); for (i = 0; i < trials; i++) { start = ktime_get(); for (j = 0; j < ARRAY_SIZE(ptr); j++) while (!(ptr[j] = kmem_cache_alloc(page_pool, GFP_KERNEL))); ctotal += ktime_us_delta(ktime_get(), start); for (j = 0; j < ARRAY_SIZE(ptr); j++) kmem_cache_free(page_pool, ptr[j]); start = ktime_get(); for (j = 0; j < ARRAY_SIZE(ptr); j++) while (!(ptr[j] = (void *)__get_free_page(GFP_KERNEL))); gtotal += ktime_us_delta(ktime_get(), start); for (j = 0; j < ARRAY_SIZE(ptr); j++) free_page((unsigned long)ptr[j]); start = ktime_get(); for (j = 0; j < ARRAY_SIZE(ptr); j++) while (!(ptr[j] = __kmalloc(PAGE_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL))); ktotal += ktime_us_delta(ktime_get(), start); for (j = 0; j < ARRAY_SIZE(ptr); j++) kfree(ptr[j]); start = ktime_get(); *ptr = vmalloc(ARRAY_SIZE(ptr) * PAGE_SIZE); vtotal += ktime_us_delta(ktime_get(), start); vfree(*ptr); } kmem_cache_destroy(page_pool); printk("%s: __get_free_page: %lld us\n", __func__, gtotal / trials); printk("%s: __kmalloc: %lld us\n", __func__, ktotal / trials); printk("%s: kmem_cache_alloc: %lld us\n", __func__, ctotal / trials); printk("%s: vmalloc: %lld us\n", __func__, vtotal / trials); complete(data); return 0; } static int __init start_test(void) { DECLARE_COMPLETION_ONSTACK(done); BUG_ON(IS_ERR(kthread_run(speedtest, &done, "malloc_test"))); wait_for_completion(&done); return 0; } late_initcall(start_test); Signed-off-by: Sultan Alsawaf <[email protected]>

The RCU read lock isn't necessary in list_lru_count_one() when the condition that requires RCU (CONFIG_MEMCG && !CONFIG_SLOB) isn't met. The highly-frequent RCU lock and unlock adds measurable overhead to the shrink_slab() path when it isn't needed. As such, we can simply omit the RCU read lock in this case to improve performance. Signed-off-by: Sultan Alsawaf <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Kazuki Hashimoto <[email protected]>

… delayed items When running delayed items we are holding a delayed node's mutex and then we will attempt to modify a subvolume btree to insert/update/delete the delayed items. However if have an error during the insertions for example, btrfs_insert_delayed_items() may return with a path that has locked extent buffers (a leaf at the very least), and then we attempt to release the delayed node at __btrfs_run_delayed_items(), which requires taking the delayed node's mutex, causing an ABBA type of deadlock. This was reported by syzbot and the lockdep splat is the following: WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.5.0-rc7-syzkaller-00024-g93f5de5f648d #0 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ syz-executor.2/13257 is trying to acquire lock: ffff88801835c0c0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x9a/0xaa0 fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:256 but task is already holding lock: ffff88802a5ab8e8 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x3c/0x2a0 fs/btrfs/locking.c:198 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}: __lock_release kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5475 [inline] lock_release+0x36f/0x9d0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5781 up_write+0x79/0x580 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1625 btrfs_tree_unlock_rw fs/btrfs/locking.h:189 [inline] btrfs_unlock_up_safe+0x179/0x3b0 fs/btrfs/locking.c:239 search_leaf fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1986 [inline] btrfs_search_slot+0x2511/0x2f80 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2230 btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x9c/0x180 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:4376 btrfs_insert_delayed_item fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:746 [inline] btrfs_insert_delayed_items fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:824 [inline] __btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_items+0xd24/0x2410 fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1111 __btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x1db/0x430 fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1153 flush_space+0x269/0xe70 fs/btrfs/space-info.c:723 btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space+0x106/0x350 fs/btrfs/space-info.c:1078 process_one_work+0x92c/0x12c0 kernel/workqueue.c:2600 worker_thread+0xa63/0x1210 kernel/workqueue.c:2751 kthread+0x2b8/0x350 kernel/kthread.c:389 ret_from_fork+0x2e/0x60 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:145 ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:304 -> #0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3142 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3261 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3876 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x39ff/0x7f70 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5144 lock_acquire+0x1e3/0x520 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5761 __mutex_lock_common+0x1d8/0x2530 kernel/locking/mutex.c:603 __mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:747 [inline] mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20 kernel/locking/mutex.c:799 __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x9a/0xaa0 fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:256 btrfs_release_delayed_node fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:281 [inline] __btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x2b5/0x430 fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1156 btrfs_commit_transaction+0x859/0x2ff0 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:2276 btrfs_sync_file+0xf56/0x1330 fs/btrfs/file.c:1988 vfs_fsync_range fs/sync.c:188 [inline] vfs_fsync fs/sync.c:202 [inline] do_fsync fs/sync.c:212 [inline] __do_sys_fsync fs/sync.c:220 [inline] __se_sys_fsync fs/sync.c:218 [inline] __x64_sys_fsync+0x196/0x1e0 fs/sync.c:218 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(btrfs-tree-00); lock(&delayed_node->mutex); lock(btrfs-tree-00); lock(&delayed_node->mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by syz-executor.2/13257: #0: ffff88802c1ee370 (btrfs_trans_num_writers){++++}-{0:0}, at: spin_unlock include/linux/spinlock.h:391 [inline] #0: ffff88802c1ee370 (btrfs_trans_num_writers){++++}-{0:0}, at: join_transaction+0xb87/0xe00 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:287 #1: ffff88802c1ee398 (btrfs_trans_num_extwriters){++++}-{0:0}, at: join_transaction+0xbb2/0xe00 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:288 #2: ffff88802a5ab8e8 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x3c/0x2a0 fs/btrfs/locking.c:198 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 13257 Comm: syz-executor.2 Not tainted 6.5.0-rc7-syzkaller-00024-g93f5de5f648d #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 07/26/2023 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x1e7/0x2d0 lib/dump_stack.c:106 check_noncircular+0x375/0x4a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2195 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3142 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3261 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3876 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x39ff/0x7f70 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5144 lock_acquire+0x1e3/0x520 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5761 __mutex_lock_common+0x1d8/0x2530 kernel/locking/mutex.c:603 __mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:747 [inline] mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20 kernel/locking/mutex.c:799 __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x9a/0xaa0 fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:256 btrfs_release_delayed_node fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:281 [inline] __btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x2b5/0x430 fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1156 btrfs_commit_transaction+0x859/0x2ff0 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:2276 btrfs_sync_file+0xf56/0x1330 fs/btrfs/file.c:1988 vfs_fsync_range fs/sync.c:188 [inline] vfs_fsync fs/sync.c:202 [inline] do_fsync fs/sync.c:212 [inline] __do_sys_fsync fs/sync.c:220 [inline] __se_sys_fsync fs/sync.c:218 [inline] __x64_sys_fsync+0x196/0x1e0 fs/sync.c:218 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd RIP: 0033:0x7f3ad047cae9 Code: 28 00 00 00 75 (...) RSP: 002b:00007f3ad12510c8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000004a RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f3ad059bf80 RCX: 00007f3ad047cae9 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000005 RBP: 00007f3ad04c847a R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 000000000000000b R14: 00007f3ad059bf80 R15: 00007ffe56af92f8 </TASK> ------------[ cut here ]------------ Fix this by releasing the path before releasing the delayed node in the error path at __btrfs_run_delayed_items(). Reported-by: [email protected] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/[email protected]/ CC: [email protected] # 4.14+ Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>

The following warning was reported when running "./test_progs -a link_api -a linked_list" on a RISC-V QEMU VM: ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 261 at kernel/bpf/memalloc.c:342 bpf_mem_refill Modules linked in: bpf_testmod(OE) CPU: 3 PID: 261 Comm: test_progs- ... 6.5.0-rc5-01743-gdcb152bb8328 #2 Hardware name: riscv-virtio,qemu (DT) epc : bpf_mem_refill+0x1fc/0x206 ra : irq_work_single+0x68/0x70 epc : ffffffff801b1bc4 ra : ffffffff8015fe84 sp : ff2000000001be20 gp : ffffffff82d26138 tp : ff6000008477a800 t0 : 0000000000046600 t1 : ffffffff812b6ddc t2 : 0000000000000000 s0 : ff2000000001be70 s1 : ff5ffffffffe8998 a0 : ff5ffffffffe8998 a1 : ff600003fef4b000 a2 : 000000000000003f a3 : ffffffff80008250 a4 : 0000000000000060 a5 : 0000000000000080 a6 : 0000000000000000 a7 : 0000000000735049 s2 : ff5ffffffffe8998 s3 : 0000000000000022 s4 : 0000000000001000 s5 : 0000000000000007 s6 : ff5ffffffffe8570 s7 : ffffffff82d6bd30 s8 : 000000000000003f s9 : ffffffff82d2c5e8 s10: 000000000000ffff s11: ffffffff82d2c5d8 t3 : ffffffff81ea8f28 t4 : 0000000000000000 t5 : ff6000008fd28278 t6 : 0000000000040000 [<ffffffff801b1bc4>] bpf_mem_refill+0x1fc/0x206 [<ffffffff8015fe84>] irq_work_single+0x68/0x70 [<ffffffff8015feb4>] irq_work_run_list+0x28/0x36 [<ffffffff8015fefa>] irq_work_run+0x38/0x66 [<ffffffff8000828a>] handle_IPI+0x3a/0xb4 [<ffffffff800a5c3a>] handle_percpu_devid_irq+0xa4/0x1f8 [<ffffffff8009fafa>] generic_handle_domain_irq+0x28/0x36 [<ffffffff800ae570>] ipi_mux_process+0xac/0xfa [<ffffffff8000a8ea>] sbi_ipi_handle+0x2e/0x88 [<ffffffff8009fafa>] generic_handle_domain_irq+0x28/0x36 [<ffffffff807ee70e>] riscv_intc_irq+0x36/0x4e [<ffffffff812b5d3a>] handle_riscv_irq+0x54/0x86 [<ffffffff812b6904>] do_irq+0x66/0x98 ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- The warning is due to WARN_ON_ONCE(tgt->unit_size != c->unit_size) in free_bulk(). The direct reason is that a object is allocated and freed by bpf_mem_caches with different unit_size. The root cause is that KMALLOC_MIN_SIZE is 64 and there is no 96-bytes slab cache in the specific VM. When linked_list test allocates a 72-bytes object through bpf_obj_new(), bpf_global_ma will allocate it from a bpf_mem_cache with 96-bytes unit_size, but this bpf_mem_cache is backed by 128-bytes slab cache. When the object is freed, bpf_mem_free() uses ksize() to choose the corresponding bpf_mem_cache. Because the object is allocated from 128-bytes slab cache, ksize() returns 128, bpf_mem_free() chooses a 128-bytes bpf_mem_cache to free the object and triggers the warning. A similar warning will also be reported when using CONFIG_SLAB instead of CONFIG_SLUB in a x86-64 kernel. Because CONFIG_SLUB defines KMALLOC_MIN_SIZE as 8 but CONFIG_SLAB defines KMALLOC_MIN_SIZE as 32. An alternative fix is to use kmalloc_size_round() in bpf_mem_alloc() to choose a bpf_mem_cache which has the same unit_size with the backing slab cache, but it may introduce performance degradation, so fix the warning by adjusting the indexes in size_index according to the value of KMALLOC_MIN_SIZE just like setup_kmalloc_cache_index_table() does. Fixes: 822fb26 ("bpf: Add a hint to allocated objects.") Reported-by: Björn Töpel <[email protected]> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>

Hou Tao says: ==================== Fix the unmatched unit_size of bpf_mem_cache From: Hou Tao <[email protected]> Hi, The patchset aims to fix the reported warning [0] when the unit_size of bpf_mem_cache is mismatched with the object size of underly slab-cache. Patch #1 fixes the warning by adjusting size_index according to the value of KMALLOC_MIN_SIZE, so bpf_mem_cache with unit_size which is smaller than KMALLOC_MIN_SIZE or is not aligned with KMALLOC_MIN_SIZE will be redirected to bpf_mem_cache with bigger unit_size. Patch #2 doesn't do prefill for these redirected bpf_mem_cache to save memory. Patch #3 adds further error check in bpf_mem_alloc_init() to ensure the unit_size and object_size are always matched and to prevent potential issues due to the mismatch. Please see individual patches for more details. And comments are always welcome. [0]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected] ==================== Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>

macb_set_tx_clk() is called under a spinlock but itself calls clk_set_rate() which can sleep. This results in: | BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/mutex.c:580 | pps pps1: new PPS source ptp1 | in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 1, non_block: 0, pid: 40, name: kworker/u4:3 | preempt_count: 1, expected: 0 | RCU nest depth: 0, expected: 0 | 4 locks held by kworker/u4:3/40: | #0: ffff000003409148 | macb ff0c000.ethernet: gem-ptp-timer ptp clock registered. | ((wq_completion)events_power_efficient){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x14c/0x51c | #1: ffff8000833cbdd8 ((work_completion)(&pl->resolve)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x14c/0x51c | #2: ffff000004f01578 (&pl->state_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: phylink_resolve+0x44/0x4e8 | #3: ffff000004f06f50 (&bp->lock){....}-{3:3}, at: macb_mac_link_up+0x40/0x2ac | irq event stamp: 113998 | hardirqs last enabled at (113997): [<ffff800080e8503c>] _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x30/0x64 | hardirqs last disabled at (113998): [<ffff800080e84478>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0xac/0xc8 | softirqs last enabled at (113608): [<ffff800080010630>] __do_softirq+0x430/0x4e4 | softirqs last disabled at (113597): [<ffff80008001614c>] ____do_softirq+0x10/0x1c | CPU: 0 PID: 40 Comm: kworker/u4:3 Not tainted 6.5.0-11717-g9355ce8b2f50-dirty torvalds#368 | Hardware name: ... ZynqMP ... (DT) | Workqueue: events_power_efficient phylink_resolve | Call trace: | dump_backtrace+0x98/0xf0 | show_stack+0x18/0x24 | dump_stack_lvl+0x60/0xac | dump_stack+0x18/0x24 | __might_resched+0x144/0x24c | __might_sleep+0x48/0x98 | __mutex_lock+0x58/0x7b0 | mutex_lock_nested+0x24/0x30 | clk_prepare_lock+0x4c/0xa8 | clk_set_rate+0x24/0x8c | macb_mac_link_up+0x25c/0x2ac | phylink_resolve+0x178/0x4e8 | process_one_work+0x1ec/0x51c | worker_thread+0x1ec/0x3e4 | kthread+0x120/0x124 | ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 The obvious fix is to move the call to macb_set_tx_clk() out of the protected area. This seems safe as rx and tx are both disabled anyway at this point. It is however not entirely clear what the spinlock shall protect. It could be the read-modify-write access to the NCFGR register, but this is accessed in macb_set_rx_mode() and macb_set_rxcsum_feature() as well without holding the spinlock. It could also be the register accesses done in mog_init_rings() or macb_init_buffers(), but again these functions are called without holding the spinlock in macb_hresp_error_task(). The locking seems fishy in this driver and it might deserve another look before this patch is applied. Fixes: 633e98a ("net: macb: use resolved link config in mac_link_up()") Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>

After commit 50f3034 ("igb: Enable SR-IOV after reinit"), removing the igb module could hang or crash (depending on the machine) when the module has been loaded with the max_vfs parameter set to some value != 0. In case of one test machine with a dual port 82580, this hang occurred: [ 232.480687] igb 0000:41:00.1: removed PHC on enp65s0f1 [ 233.093257] igb 0000:41:00.1: IOV Disabled [ 233.329969] pcieport 0000:40:01.0: AER: Multiple Uncorrected (Non-Fatal) err0 [ 233.340302] igb 0000:41:00.0: PCIe Bus Error: severity=Uncorrected (Non-Fata) [ 233.352248] igb 0000:41:00.0: device [8086:1516] error status/mask=00100000 [ 233.361088] igb 0000:41:00.0: [20] UnsupReq (First) [ 233.368183] igb 0000:41:00.0: AER: TLP Header: 40000001 0000040f cdbfc00c c [ 233.376846] igb 0000:41:00.1: PCIe Bus Error: severity=Uncorrected (Non-Fata) [ 233.388779] igb 0000:41:00.1: device [8086:1516] error status/mask=00100000 [ 233.397629] igb 0000:41:00.1: [20] UnsupReq (First) [ 233.404736] igb 0000:41:00.1: AER: TLP Header: 40000001 0000040f cdbfc00c c [ 233.538214] pci 0000:41:00.1: AER: can't recover (no error_detected callback) [ 233.538401] igb 0000:41:00.0: removed PHC on enp65s0f0 [ 233.546197] pcieport 0000:40:01.0: AER: device recovery failed [ 234.157244] igb 0000:41:00.0: IOV Disabled [ 371.619705] INFO: task irq/35-aerdrv:257 blocked for more than 122 seconds. [ 371.627489] Not tainted 6.4.0-dirty #2 [ 371.632257] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this. [ 371.641000] task:irq/35-aerdrv state:D stack:0 pid:257 ppid:2 f0 [ 371.650330] Call Trace: [ 371.653061] <TASK> [ 371.655407] __schedule+0x20e/0x660 [ 371.659313] schedule+0x5a/0xd0 [ 371.662824] schedule_preempt_disabled+0x11/0x20 [ 371.667983] __mutex_lock.constprop.0+0x372/0x6c0 [ 371.673237] ? __pfx_aer_root_reset+0x10/0x10 [ 371.678105] report_error_detected+0x25/0x1c0 [ 371.682974] ? __pfx_report_normal_detected+0x10/0x10 [ 371.688618] pci_walk_bus+0x72/0x90 [ 371.692519] pcie_do_recovery+0xb2/0x330 [ 371.696899] aer_process_err_devices+0x117/0x170 [ 371.702055] aer_isr+0x1c0/0x1e0 [ 371.705661] ? __set_cpus_allowed_ptr+0x54/0xa0 [ 371.710723] ? __pfx_irq_thread_fn+0x10/0x10 [ 371.715496] irq_thread_fn+0x20/0x60 [ 371.719491] irq_thread+0xe6/0x1b0 [ 371.723291] ? __pfx_irq_thread_dtor+0x10/0x10 [ 371.728255] ? __pfx_irq_thread+0x10/0x10 [ 371.732731] kthread+0xe2/0x110 [ 371.736243] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 [ 371.740430] ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x50 [ 371.744428] </TASK> The reproducer was a simple script: #!/bin/sh for i in `seq 1 5`; do modprobe -rv igb modprobe -v igb max_vfs=1 sleep 1 modprobe -rv igb done It turned out that this could only be reproduce on 82580 (quad and dual-port), but not on 82576, i350 and i210. Further debugging showed that igb_enable_sriov()'s call to pci_enable_sriov() is failing, because dev->is_physfn is 0 on 82580. Prior to commit 50f3034 ("igb: Enable SR-IOV after reinit"), igb_enable_sriov() jumped into the "err_out" cleanup branch. After this commit it only returned the error code. So the cleanup didn't take place, and the incorrect VF setup in the igb_adapter structure fooled the igb driver into assuming that VFs have been set up where no VF actually existed. Fix this problem by cleaning up again if pci_enable_sriov() fails. Fixes: 50f3034 ("igb: Enable SR-IOV after reinit") Signed-off-by: Corinna Vinschen <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Akihiko Odaki <[email protected]> Tested-by: Rafal Romanowski <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Tony Nguyen <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>

Fix an error detected by memory sanitizer: ``` ==4033==WARNING: MemorySanitizer: use-of-uninitialized-value #0 0x55fb0fbedfc7 in read_alias_info tools/perf/util/pmu.c:457:6 #1 0x55fb0fbea339 in check_info_data tools/perf/util/pmu.c:1434:2 #2 0x55fb0fbea339 in perf_pmu__check_alias tools/perf/util/pmu.c:1504:9 #3 0x55fb0fbdca85 in parse_events_add_pmu tools/perf/util/parse-events.c:1429:32 #4 0x55fb0f965230 in parse_events_parse tools/perf/util/parse-events.y:299:6 #5 0x55fb0fbdf6b2 in parse_events__scanner tools/perf/util/parse-events.c:1822:8 torvalds#6 0x55fb0fbdf8c1 in __parse_events tools/perf/util/parse-events.c:2094:8 torvalds#7 0x55fb0fa8ffa9 in parse_events tools/perf/util/parse-events.h:41:9 torvalds#8 0x55fb0fa8ffa9 in test_event tools/perf/tests/parse-events.c:2393:8 torvalds#9 0x55fb0fa8f458 in test__pmu_events tools/perf/tests/parse-events.c:2551:15 torvalds#10 0x55fb0fa6d93f in run_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:242:9 torvalds#11 0x55fb0fa6d93f in test_and_print tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:271:8 torvalds#12 0x55fb0fa6d082 in __cmd_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:442:5 torvalds#13 0x55fb0fa6d082 in cmd_test tools/perf/tests/builtin-test.c:564:9 torvalds#14 0x55fb0f942720 in run_builtin tools/perf/perf.c:322:11 torvalds#15 0x55fb0f942486 in handle_internal_command tools/perf/perf.c:375:8 torvalds#16 0x55fb0f941dab in run_argv tools/perf/perf.c:419:2 torvalds#17 0x55fb0f941dab in main tools/perf/perf.c:535:3 ``` Fixes: 7b723db ("perf pmu: Be lazy about loading event info files from sysfs") Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <[email protected]> Cc: James Clark <[email protected]> Cc: Kan Liang <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]>

Sebastian Andrzej Siewior says: ==================== net: hsr: Properly parse HSRv1 supervisor frames. this is a follow-up to https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ replacing https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ by grabing/ adding tags and reposting with a commit message plus a missing __packed to a struct (#2) plus extending the testsuite to sover HSRv1 which is what broke here (#3-#5). HSRv0 is (was) not affected. ==================== Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>

Specific stress involving frequent CPU-hotplug operations, such as running rcutorture for example, may trigger the following message: NOHZ tick-stop error: local softirq work is pending, handler #2!!!" This happens in the CPU-down hotplug process, after CPUHP_AP_SMPBOOT_THREADS whose teardown callback parks ksoftirqd, and before the target CPU shuts down through CPUHP_AP_IDLE_DEAD. In this fragile intermediate state, softirqs waiting for threaded handling may be forever ignored and eventually reported by the idle task as in the above example. However some vectors are known to be safe as long as the corresponding subsystems have teardown callbacks handling the migration of their events. The above error message reports pending timers softirq although this vector can be considered as hotplug safe because the CPUHP_TIMERS_PREPARE teardown callback performs the necessary migration of timers after the death of the CPU. Hrtimers also have a similar hotplug handling. Therefore this error message, as far as (hr-)timers are concerned, can be considered spurious and the relevant softirq vectors can be marked as hotplug safe. Fixes: 0345691 ("tick/rcu: Stop allowing RCU_SOFTIRQ in idle") Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]

…es_lock [ Upstream commit fb5a431 ] __dma_entry_alloc_check_leak() calls into printk -> serial console output (qcom geni) and grabs port->lock under free_entries_lock spin lock, which is a reverse locking dependency chain as qcom_geni IRQ handler can call into dma-debug code and grab free_entries_lock under port->lock. Move __dma_entry_alloc_check_leak() call out of free_entries_lock scope so that we don't acquire serial console's port->lock under it. Trimmed-down lockdep splat: The existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (free_entries_lock){-.-.}-{2:2}: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x60/0x80 dma_entry_alloc+0x38/0x110 debug_dma_map_page+0x60/0xf8 dma_map_page_attrs+0x1e0/0x230 dma_map_single_attrs.constprop.0+0x6c/0xc8 geni_se_rx_dma_prep+0x40/0xcc qcom_geni_serial_isr+0x310/0x510 __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x110/0x244 handle_irq_event_percpu+0x20/0x54 handle_irq_event+0x50/0x88 handle_fasteoi_irq+0xa4/0xcc handle_irq_desc+0x28/0x40 generic_handle_domain_irq+0x24/0x30 gic_handle_irq+0xc4/0x148 do_interrupt_handler+0xa4/0xb0 el1_interrupt+0x34/0x64 el1h_64_irq_handler+0x18/0x24 el1h_64_irq+0x64/0x68 arch_local_irq_enable+0x4/0x8 ____do_softirq+0x18/0x24 ... -> #1 (&port_lock_key){-.-.}-{2:2}: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x60/0x80 qcom_geni_serial_console_write+0x184/0x1dc console_flush_all+0x344/0x454 console_unlock+0x94/0xf0 vprintk_emit+0x238/0x24c vprintk_default+0x3c/0x48 vprintk+0xb4/0xbc _printk+0x68/0x90 register_console+0x230/0x38c uart_add_one_port+0x338/0x494 qcom_geni_serial_probe+0x390/0x424 platform_probe+0x70/0xc0 really_probe+0x148/0x280 __driver_probe_device+0xfc/0x114 driver_probe_device+0x44/0x100 __device_attach_driver+0x64/0xdc bus_for_each_drv+0xb0/0xd8 __device_attach+0xe4/0x140 device_initial_probe+0x1c/0x28 bus_probe_device+0x44/0xb0 device_add+0x538/0x668 of_device_add+0x44/0x50 of_platform_device_create_pdata+0x94/0xc8 of_platform_bus_create+0x270/0x304 of_platform_populate+0xac/0xc4 devm_of_platform_populate+0x60/0xac geni_se_probe+0x154/0x160 platform_probe+0x70/0xc0 ... -> #0 (console_owner){-...}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0xdf8/0x109c lock_acquire+0x234/0x284 console_flush_all+0x330/0x454 console_unlock+0x94/0xf0 vprintk_emit+0x238/0x24c vprintk_default+0x3c/0x48 vprintk+0xb4/0xbc _printk+0x68/0x90 dma_entry_alloc+0xb4/0x110 debug_dma_map_sg+0xdc/0x2f8 __dma_map_sg_attrs+0xac/0xe4 dma_map_sgtable+0x30/0x4c get_pages+0x1d4/0x1e4 [msm] msm_gem_pin_pages_locked+0x38/0xac [msm] msm_gem_pin_vma_locked+0x58/0x88 [msm] msm_ioctl_gem_submit+0xde4/0x13ac [msm] drm_ioctl_kernel+0xe0/0x15c drm_ioctl+0x2e8/0x3f4 vfs_ioctl+0x30/0x50 ... Chain exists of: console_owner --> &port_lock_key --> free_entries_lock Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(free_entries_lock); lock(&port_lock_key); lock(free_entries_lock); lock(console_owner); *** DEADLOCK *** Call trace: dump_backtrace+0xb4/0xf0 show_stack+0x20/0x30 dump_stack_lvl+0x60/0x84 dump_stack+0x18/0x24 print_circular_bug+0x1cc/0x234 check_noncircular+0x78/0xac __lock_acquire+0xdf8/0x109c lock_acquire+0x234/0x284 console_flush_all+0x330/0x454 console_unlock+0x94/0xf0 vprintk_emit+0x238/0x24c vprintk_default+0x3c/0x48 vprintk+0xb4/0xbc _printk+0x68/0x90 dma_entry_alloc+0xb4/0x110 debug_dma_map_sg+0xdc/0x2f8 __dma_map_sg_attrs+0xac/0xe4 dma_map_sgtable+0x30/0x4c get_pages+0x1d4/0x1e4 [msm] msm_gem_pin_pages_locked+0x38/0xac [msm] msm_gem_pin_vma_locked+0x58/0x88 [msm] msm_ioctl_gem_submit+0xde4/0x13ac [msm] drm_ioctl_kernel+0xe0/0x15c drm_ioctl+0x2e8/0x3f4 vfs_ioctl+0x30/0x50 ... Reported-by: Rob Clark <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <[email protected]> Acked-by: Robin Murphy <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

commit 1a6a464 upstream. Specific stress involving frequent CPU-hotplug operations, such as running rcutorture for example, may trigger the following message: NOHZ tick-stop error: local softirq work is pending, handler #2!!!" This happens in the CPU-down hotplug process, after CPUHP_AP_SMPBOOT_THREADS whose teardown callback parks ksoftirqd, and before the target CPU shuts down through CPUHP_AP_IDLE_DEAD. In this fragile intermediate state, softirqs waiting for threaded handling may be forever ignored and eventually reported by the idle task as in the above example. However some vectors are known to be safe as long as the corresponding subsystems have teardown callbacks handling the migration of their events. The above error message reports pending timers softirq although this vector can be considered as hotplug safe because the CPUHP_TIMERS_PREPARE teardown callback performs the necessary migration of timers after the death of the CPU. Hrtimers also have a similar hotplug handling. Therefore this error message, as far as (hr-)timers are concerned, can be considered spurious and the relevant softirq vectors can be marked as hotplug safe. Fixes: 0345691 ("tick/rcu: Stop allowing RCU_SOFTIRQ in idle") Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

Fix the deadlock by refactoring the MR cache cleanup flow to flush the workqueue without holding the rb_lock. This adds a race between cache cleanup and creation of new entries which we solve by denied creation of new entries after cache cleanup started. Lockdep: WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 2785.326074 ] 6.2.0-rc6_for_upstream_debug_2023_01_31_14_02 #1 Not tainted [ 2785.339778 ] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 2785.340848 ] devlink/53872 is trying to acquire lock: [ 2785.341701 ] ffff888124f8c0c8 ((work_completion)(&(&ent->dwork)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __flush_work+0xc8/0x900 [ 2785.343403 ] [ 2785.343403 ] but task is already holding lock: [ 2785.344464 ] ffff88817e8f1260 (&dev->cache.rb_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: mlx5_mkey_cache_cleanup+0x77/0x250 [mlx5_ib] [ 2785.346273 ] [ 2785.346273 ] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 2785.346273 ] [ 2785.347720 ] [ 2785.347720 ] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 2785.349003 ] [ 2785.349003 ] -> #1 (&dev->cache.rb_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 2785.350160 ] __mutex_lock+0x14c/0x15c0 [ 2785.350962 ] delayed_cache_work_func+0x2d1/0x610 [mlx5_ib] [ 2785.352044 ] process_one_work+0x7c2/0x1310 [ 2785.352879 ] worker_thread+0x59d/0xec0 [ 2785.353636 ] kthread+0x28f/0x330 [ 2785.354370 ] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 [ 2785.355135 ] [ 2785.355135 ] -> #0 ((work_completion)(&(&ent->dwork)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: [ 2785.356515 ] __lock_acquire+0x2d8a/0x5fe0 [ 2785.357349 ] lock_acquire+0x1c1/0x540 [ 2785.358121 ] __flush_work+0xe8/0x900 [ 2785.358852 ] __cancel_work_timer+0x2c7/0x3f0 [ 2785.359711 ] mlx5_mkey_cache_cleanup+0xfb/0x250 [mlx5_ib] [ 2785.360781 ] mlx5_ib_stage_pre_ib_reg_umr_cleanup+0x16/0x30 [mlx5_ib] [ 2785.361969 ] __mlx5_ib_remove+0x68/0x120 [mlx5_ib] [ 2785.362960 ] mlx5r_remove+0x63/0x80 [mlx5_ib] [ 2785.363870 ] auxiliary_bus_remove+0x52/0x70 [ 2785.364715 ] device_release_driver_internal+0x3c1/0x600 [ 2785.365695 ] bus_remove_device+0x2a5/0x560 [ 2785.366525 ] device_del+0x492/0xb80 [ 2785.367276 ] mlx5_detach_device+0x1a9/0x360 [mlx5_core] [ 2785.368615 ] mlx5_unload_one_devl_locked+0x5a/0x110 [mlx5_core] [ 2785.369934 ] mlx5_devlink_reload_down+0x292/0x580 [mlx5_core] [ 2785.371292 ] devlink_reload+0x439/0x590 [ 2785.372075 ] devlink_nl_cmd_reload+0xaef/0xff0 [ 2785.372973 ] genl_family_rcv_msg_doit.isra.0+0x1bd/0x290 [ 2785.374011 ] genl_rcv_msg+0x3ca/0x6c0 [ 2785.374798 ] netlink_rcv_skb+0x12c/0x360 [ 2785.375612 ] genl_rcv+0x24/0x40 [ 2785.376295 ] netlink_unicast+0x438/0x710 [ 2785.377121 ] netlink_sendmsg+0x7a1/0xca0 [ 2785.377926 ] sock_sendmsg+0xc5/0x190 [ 2785.378668 ] __sys_sendto+0x1bc/0x290 [ 2785.379440 ] __x64_sys_sendto+0xdc/0x1b0 [ 2785.380255 ] do_syscall_64+0x3d/0x90 [ 2785.381031 ] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0 [ 2785.381967 ] [ 2785.381967 ] other info that might help us debug this: [ 2785.381967 ] [ 2785.383448 ] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 2785.383448 ] [ 2785.384544 ] CPU0 CPU1 [ 2785.385383 ] ---- ---- [ 2785.386193 ] lock(&dev->cache.rb_lock); [ 2785.386940 ] lock((work_completion)(&(&ent->dwork)->work)); [ 2785.388327 ] lock(&dev->cache.rb_lock); [ 2785.389425 ] lock((work_completion)(&(&ent->dwork)->work)); [ 2785.390414 ] [ 2785.390414 ] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 2785.390414 ] [ 2785.391579 ] 6 locks held by devlink/53872: [ 2785.392341 ] #0: ffffffff84c17a50 (cb_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: genl_rcv+0x15/0x40 [ 2785.393630 ] #1: ffff888142280218 (&devlink->lock_key){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: devlink_get_from_attrs_lock+0x12d/0x2d0 [ 2785.395324 ] #2: ffff8881422d3c38 (&dev->lock_key){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: mlx5_unload_one_devl_locked+0x4a/0x110 [mlx5_core] [ 2785.397322 ] #3: ffffffffa0e59068 (mlx5_intf_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: mlx5_detach_device+0x60/0x360 [mlx5_core] [ 2785.399231 ] #4: ffff88810e3cb0e8 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: device_release_driver_internal+0x8d/0x600 [ 2785.400864 ] #5: ffff88817e8f1260 (&dev->cache.rb_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: mlx5_mkey_cache_cleanup+0x77/0x250 [mlx5_ib] Fixes: b958451 ("RDMA/mlx5: Change the cache structure to an RB-tree") Signed-off-by: Shay Drory <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Michael Guralnik <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <[email protected]>

The following call trace shows a deadlock issue due to recursive locking of mutex "device_mutex". First lock acquire is in target_for_each_device() and second in target_free_device(). PID: 148266 TASK: ffff8be21ffb5d00 CPU: 10 COMMAND: "iscsi_ttx" #0 [ffffa2bfc9ec3b18] __schedule at ffffffffa8060e7f #1 [ffffa2bfc9ec3ba0] schedule at ffffffffa8061224 #2 [ffffa2bfc9ec3bb8] schedule_preempt_disabled at ffffffffa80615ee #3 [ffffa2bfc9ec3bc8] __mutex_lock at ffffffffa8062fd7 #4 [ffffa2bfc9ec3c40] __mutex_lock_slowpath at ffffffffa80631d3 #5 [ffffa2bfc9ec3c50] mutex_lock at ffffffffa806320c torvalds#6 [ffffa2bfc9ec3c68] target_free_device at ffffffffc0935998 [target_core_mod] torvalds#7 [ffffa2bfc9ec3c90] target_core_dev_release at ffffffffc092f975 [target_core_mod] torvalds#8 [ffffa2bfc9ec3ca0] config_item_put at ffffffffa79d250f torvalds#9 [ffffa2bfc9ec3cd0] config_item_put at ffffffffa79d2583 torvalds#10 [ffffa2bfc9ec3ce0] target_devices_idr_iter at ffffffffc0933f3a [target_core_mod] torvalds#11 [ffffa2bfc9ec3d00] idr_for_each at ffffffffa803f6fc torvalds#12 [ffffa2bfc9ec3d60] target_for_each_device at ffffffffc0935670 [target_core_mod] torvalds#13 [ffffa2bfc9ec3d98] transport_deregister_session at ffffffffc0946408 [target_core_mod] torvalds#14 [ffffa2bfc9ec3dc8] iscsit_close_session at ffffffffc09a44a6 [iscsi_target_mod] torvalds#15 [ffffa2bfc9ec3df0] iscsit_close_connection at ffffffffc09a4a88 [iscsi_target_mod] torvalds#16 [ffffa2bfc9ec3df8] finish_task_switch at ffffffffa76e5d07 torvalds#17 [ffffa2bfc9ec3e78] iscsit_take_action_for_connection_exit at ffffffffc0991c23 [iscsi_target_mod] torvalds#18 [ffffa2bfc9ec3ea0] iscsi_target_tx_thread at ffffffffc09a403b [iscsi_target_mod] torvalds#19 [ffffa2bfc9ec3f08] kthread at ffffffffa76d8080 torvalds#20 [ffffa2bfc9ec3f50] ret_from_fork at ffffffffa8200364 Fixes: 36d4cb4 ("scsi: target: Avoid that EXTENDED COPY commands trigger lock inversion") Signed-off-by: Junxiao Bi <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Reviewed-by: Mike Christie <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit a154f5f ] The following call trace shows a deadlock issue due to recursive locking of mutex "device_mutex". First lock acquire is in target_for_each_device() and second in target_free_device(). PID: 148266 TASK: ffff8be21ffb5d00 CPU: 10 COMMAND: "iscsi_ttx" #0 [ffffa2bfc9ec3b18] __schedule at ffffffffa8060e7f #1 [ffffa2bfc9ec3ba0] schedule at ffffffffa8061224 #2 [ffffa2bfc9ec3bb8] schedule_preempt_disabled at ffffffffa80615ee #3 [ffffa2bfc9ec3bc8] __mutex_lock at ffffffffa8062fd7 #4 [ffffa2bfc9ec3c40] __mutex_lock_slowpath at ffffffffa80631d3 #5 [ffffa2bfc9ec3c50] mutex_lock at ffffffffa806320c torvalds#6 [ffffa2bfc9ec3c68] target_free_device at ffffffffc0935998 [target_core_mod] torvalds#7 [ffffa2bfc9ec3c90] target_core_dev_release at ffffffffc092f975 [target_core_mod] torvalds#8 [ffffa2bfc9ec3ca0] config_item_put at ffffffffa79d250f torvalds#9 [ffffa2bfc9ec3cd0] config_item_put at ffffffffa79d2583 torvalds#10 [ffffa2bfc9ec3ce0] target_devices_idr_iter at ffffffffc0933f3a [target_core_mod] torvalds#11 [ffffa2bfc9ec3d00] idr_for_each at ffffffffa803f6fc torvalds#12 [ffffa2bfc9ec3d60] target_for_each_device at ffffffffc0935670 [target_core_mod] torvalds#13 [ffffa2bfc9ec3d98] transport_deregister_session at ffffffffc0946408 [target_core_mod] torvalds#14 [ffffa2bfc9ec3dc8] iscsit_close_session at ffffffffc09a44a6 [iscsi_target_mod] torvalds#15 [ffffa2bfc9ec3df0] iscsit_close_connection at ffffffffc09a4a88 [iscsi_target_mod] torvalds#16 [ffffa2bfc9ec3df8] finish_task_switch at ffffffffa76e5d07 torvalds#17 [ffffa2bfc9ec3e78] iscsit_take_action_for_connection_exit at ffffffffc0991c23 [iscsi_target_mod] torvalds#18 [ffffa2bfc9ec3ea0] iscsi_target_tx_thread at ffffffffc09a403b [iscsi_target_mod] torvalds#19 [ffffa2bfc9ec3f08] kthread at ffffffffa76d8080 torvalds#20 [ffffa2bfc9ec3f50] ret_from_fork at ffffffffa8200364 Fixes: 36d4cb4 ("scsi: target: Avoid that EXTENDED COPY commands trigger lock inversion") Signed-off-by: Junxiao Bi <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Reviewed-by: Mike Christie <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

commit 374012b upstream. Fix the deadlock by refactoring the MR cache cleanup flow to flush the workqueue without holding the rb_lock. This adds a race between cache cleanup and creation of new entries which we solve by denied creation of new entries after cache cleanup started. Lockdep: WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 2785.326074 ] 6.2.0-rc6_for_upstream_debug_2023_01_31_14_02 #1 Not tainted [ 2785.339778 ] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 2785.340848 ] devlink/53872 is trying to acquire lock: [ 2785.341701 ] ffff888124f8c0c8 ((work_completion)(&(&ent->dwork)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __flush_work+0xc8/0x900 [ 2785.343403 ] [ 2785.343403 ] but task is already holding lock: [ 2785.344464 ] ffff88817e8f1260 (&dev->cache.rb_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: mlx5_mkey_cache_cleanup+0x77/0x250 [mlx5_ib] [ 2785.346273 ] [ 2785.346273 ] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 2785.346273 ] [ 2785.347720 ] [ 2785.347720 ] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 2785.349003 ] [ 2785.349003 ] -> #1 (&dev->cache.rb_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 2785.350160 ] __mutex_lock+0x14c/0x15c0 [ 2785.350962 ] delayed_cache_work_func+0x2d1/0x610 [mlx5_ib] [ 2785.352044 ] process_one_work+0x7c2/0x1310 [ 2785.352879 ] worker_thread+0x59d/0xec0 [ 2785.353636 ] kthread+0x28f/0x330 [ 2785.354370 ] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 [ 2785.355135 ] [ 2785.355135 ] -> #0 ((work_completion)(&(&ent->dwork)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: [ 2785.356515 ] __lock_acquire+0x2d8a/0x5fe0 [ 2785.357349 ] lock_acquire+0x1c1/0x540 [ 2785.358121 ] __flush_work+0xe8/0x900 [ 2785.358852 ] __cancel_work_timer+0x2c7/0x3f0 [ 2785.359711 ] mlx5_mkey_cache_cleanup+0xfb/0x250 [mlx5_ib] [ 2785.360781 ] mlx5_ib_stage_pre_ib_reg_umr_cleanup+0x16/0x30 [mlx5_ib] [ 2785.361969 ] __mlx5_ib_remove+0x68/0x120 [mlx5_ib] [ 2785.362960 ] mlx5r_remove+0x63/0x80 [mlx5_ib] [ 2785.363870 ] auxiliary_bus_remove+0x52/0x70 [ 2785.364715 ] device_release_driver_internal+0x3c1/0x600 [ 2785.365695 ] bus_remove_device+0x2a5/0x560 [ 2785.366525 ] device_del+0x492/0xb80 [ 2785.367276 ] mlx5_detach_device+0x1a9/0x360 [mlx5_core] [ 2785.368615 ] mlx5_unload_one_devl_locked+0x5a/0x110 [mlx5_core] [ 2785.369934 ] mlx5_devlink_reload_down+0x292/0x580 [mlx5_core] [ 2785.371292 ] devlink_reload+0x439/0x590 [ 2785.372075 ] devlink_nl_cmd_reload+0xaef/0xff0 [ 2785.372973 ] genl_family_rcv_msg_doit.isra.0+0x1bd/0x290 [ 2785.374011 ] genl_rcv_msg+0x3ca/0x6c0 [ 2785.374798 ] netlink_rcv_skb+0x12c/0x360 [ 2785.375612 ] genl_rcv+0x24/0x40 [ 2785.376295 ] netlink_unicast+0x438/0x710 [ 2785.377121 ] netlink_sendmsg+0x7a1/0xca0 [ 2785.377926 ] sock_sendmsg+0xc5/0x190 [ 2785.378668 ] __sys_sendto+0x1bc/0x290 [ 2785.379440 ] __x64_sys_sendto+0xdc/0x1b0 [ 2785.380255 ] do_syscall_64+0x3d/0x90 [ 2785.381031 ] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0 [ 2785.381967 ] [ 2785.381967 ] other info that might help us debug this: [ 2785.381967 ] [ 2785.383448 ] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 2785.383448 ] [ 2785.384544 ] CPU0 CPU1 [ 2785.385383 ] ---- ---- [ 2785.386193 ] lock(&dev->cache.rb_lock); [ 2785.386940 ] lock((work_completion)(&(&ent->dwork)->work)); [ 2785.388327 ] lock(&dev->cache.rb_lock); [ 2785.389425 ] lock((work_completion)(&(&ent->dwork)->work)); [ 2785.390414 ] [ 2785.390414 ] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 2785.390414 ] [ 2785.391579 ] 6 locks held by devlink/53872: [ 2785.392341 ] #0: ffffffff84c17a50 (cb_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: genl_rcv+0x15/0x40 [ 2785.393630 ] #1: ffff888142280218 (&devlink->lock_key){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: devlink_get_from_attrs_lock+0x12d/0x2d0 [ 2785.395324 ] #2: ffff8881422d3c38 (&dev->lock_key){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: mlx5_unload_one_devl_locked+0x4a/0x110 [mlx5_core] [ 2785.397322 ] #3: ffffffffa0e59068 (mlx5_intf_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: mlx5_detach_device+0x60/0x360 [mlx5_core] [ 2785.399231 ] #4: ffff88810e3cb0e8 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: device_release_driver_internal+0x8d/0x600 [ 2785.400864 ] #5: ffff88817e8f1260 (&dev->cache.rb_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: mlx5_mkey_cache_cleanup+0x77/0x250 [mlx5_ib] Fixes: b958451 ("RDMA/mlx5: Change the cache structure to an RB-tree") Signed-off-by: Shay Drory <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Michael Guralnik <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

The following panic can happen when mmap is called before the pmu add callback which sets the hardware counter index: this happens for example with the following command `perf record --no-bpf-event -n kill`. [ 99.461486] CPU: 1 PID: 1259 Comm: perf Tainted: G E 6.6.0-rc4ubuntu-defconfig #2 [ 99.461669] Hardware name: riscv-virtio,qemu (DT) [ 99.461748] epc : pmu_sbi_set_scounteren+0x42/0x44 [ 99.462337] ra : smp_call_function_many_cond+0x126/0x5b0 [ 99.462369] epc : ffffffff809f9d24 ra : ffffffff800f93e0 sp : ff60000082153aa0 [ 99.462407] gp : ffffffff82395c98 tp : ff6000009a218040 t0 : ff6000009ab3a4f0 [ 99.462425] t1 : 0000000000000004 t2 : 0000000000000100 s0 : ff60000082153ab0 [ 99.462459] s1 : 0000000000000000 a0 : ff60000098869528 a1 : 0000000000000000 [ 99.462473] a2 : 000000000000001f a3 : 0000000000f00000 a4 : fffffffffffffff8 [ 99.462488] a5 : 00000000000000cc a6 : 0000000000000000 a7 : 0000000000735049 [ 99.462502] s2 : 0000000000000001 s3 : ffffffff809f9ce2 s4 : ff60000098869528 [ 99.462516] s5 : 0000000000000002 s6 : 0000000000000004 s7 : 0000000000000001 [ 99.462530] s8 : ff600003fec98bc0 s9 : ffffffff826c5890 s10: ff600003fecfcde0 [ 99.462544] s11: ff600003fec98bc0 t3 : ffffffff819e2558 t4 : ff1c000004623840 [ 99.462557] t5 : 0000000000000901 t6 : ff6000008feeb890 [ 99.462570] status: 0000000200000100 badaddr: 0000000000000000 cause: 0000000000000003 [ 99.462658] [<ffffffff809f9d24>] pmu_sbi_set_scounteren+0x42/0x44 [ 99.462979] Code: 1060 4785 97bb 00d7 8fd9 9073 1067 6422 0141 8082 (9002) 0013 [ 99.463335] Kernel BUG [#2] To circumvent this, try to enable userspace access to the hardware counter when it is selected in addition to when the event is mapped. And vice-versa when the event is stopped/unmapped. Fixes: cc4c07c ("drivers: perf: Implement perf event mmap support in the SBI backend") Signed-off-by: Alexandre Ghiti <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Cc: [email protected] Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <[email protected]>

…kernel/git/kvmarm/kvmarm into HEAD KVM/arm64 fixes for 6.6, take #2 - Fix the handling of the phycal timer offset when FEAT_ECV and CNTPOFF_EL2 are implemented. - Restore the functionnality of Permission Indirection that was broken by the Fine Grained Trapping rework - Cleanup some PMU event sharing code

[ Upstream commit 4428399 ] The lt8912b driver, in its bridge detach function, calls drm_connector_unregister() and drm_connector_cleanup(). drm_connector_unregister() should be called only for connectors explicitly registered with drm_connector_register(), which is not the case in lt8912b. The driver's drm_connector_funcs.destroy hook is set to drm_connector_cleanup(). Thus the driver should not call either drm_connector_unregister() nor drm_connector_cleanup() in its lt8912_bridge_detach(), as they cause a crash on bridge detach: Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000000 Mem abort info: ESR = 0x0000000096000006 EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits SET = 0, FnV = 0 EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 FSC = 0x06: level 2 translation fault Data abort info: ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000006, ISS2 = 0x00000000 CM = 0, WnR = 0, TnD = 0, TagAccess = 0 GCS = 0, Overlay = 0, DirtyBit = 0, Xs = 0 user pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=00000000858f3000 [0000000000000000] pgd=0800000085918003, p4d=0800000085918003, pud=0800000085431003, pmd=0000000000000000 Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000006 [#1] PREEMPT SMP Modules linked in: tidss(-) display_connector lontium_lt8912b tc358768 panel_lvds panel_simple drm_dma_helper drm_kms_helper drm drm_panel_orientation_quirks CPU: 3 PID: 462 Comm: rmmod Tainted: G W 6.5.0-rc2+ #2 Hardware name: Toradex Verdin AM62 on Verdin Development Board (DT) pstate: 80000005 (Nzcv daif -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) pc : drm_connector_cleanup+0x78/0x2d4 [drm] lr : lt8912_bridge_detach+0x54/0x6c [lontium_lt8912b] sp : ffff800082ed3a90 x29: ffff800082ed3a90 x28: ffff0000040c1940 x27: 0000000000000000 x26: 0000000000000000 x25: dead000000000122 x24: dead000000000122 x23: dead000000000100 x22: ffff000003fb6388 x21: 0000000000000000 x20: 0000000000000000 x19: ffff000003fb6260 x18: fffffffffffe56e8 x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0010000000000000 x15: 0000000000000038 x14: 0000000000000000 x13: ffff800081914b48 x12: 000000000000040e x11: 000000000000015a x10: ffff80008196ebb8 x9 : ffff800081914b48 x8 : 00000000ffffefff x7 : ffff0000040c1940 x6 : ffff80007aa649d0 x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : 0000000000000001 x3 : ffff80008159e008 x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : 0000000000000000 Call trace: drm_connector_cleanup+0x78/0x2d4 [drm] lt8912_bridge_detach+0x54/0x6c [lontium_lt8912b] drm_bridge_detach+0x44/0x84 [drm] drm_encoder_cleanup+0x40/0xb8 [drm] drmm_encoder_alloc_release+0x1c/0x30 [drm] drm_managed_release+0xac/0x148 [drm] drm_dev_put.part.0+0x88/0xb8 [drm] devm_drm_dev_init_release+0x14/0x24 [drm] devm_action_release+0x14/0x20 release_nodes+0x5c/0x90 devres_release_all+0x8c/0xe0 device_unbind_cleanup+0x18/0x68 device_release_driver_internal+0x208/0x23c driver_detach+0x4c/0x94 bus_remove_driver+0x70/0xf4 driver_unregister+0x30/0x60 platform_driver_unregister+0x14/0x20 tidss_platform_driver_exit+0x18/0xb2c [tidss] __arm64_sys_delete_module+0x1a0/0x2b4 invoke_syscall+0x48/0x110 el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x60/0x10c do_el0_svc_compat+0x1c/0x40 el0_svc_compat+0x40/0xac el0t_32_sync_handler+0xb0/0x138 el0t_32_sync+0x194/0x198 Code: 9104a276 f2fbd5b7 aa0203e1 91008af8 (f85c0420) Fixes: 30e2ae9 ("drm/bridge: Introduce LT8912B DSI to HDMI bridge") Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Robert Foss <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Robert Foss <[email protected]> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit a84fbf2 ] Generating metrics llc_code_read_mpi_demand_plus_prefetch, llc_data_read_mpi_demand_plus_prefetch, llc_miss_local_memory_bandwidth_read, llc_miss_local_memory_bandwidth_write, nllc_miss_remote_memory_bandwidth_read, memory_bandwidth_read, memory_bandwidth_write, uncore_frequency, upi_data_transmit_bw, C2_Pkg_Residency, C3_Core_Residency, C3_Pkg_Residency, C6_Core_Residency, C6_Pkg_Residency, C7_Core_Residency, C7_Pkg_Residency, UNCORE_FREQ and tma_info_system_socket_clks would trigger an address sanitizer heap-buffer-overflows on a SkylakeX. ``` ==2567752==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow on address 0x5020003ed098 at pc 0x5621a816654e bp 0x7fffb55d4da0 sp 0x7fffb55d4d98 READ of size 4 at 0x5020003eee78 thread T0 #0 0x558265d6654d in aggr_cpu_id__is_empty tools/perf/util/cpumap.c:694:12 #1 0x558265c914da in perf_stat__get_aggr tools/perf/builtin-stat.c:1490:6 #2 0x558265c914da in perf_stat__get_global_cached tools/perf/builtin-stat.c:1530:9 #3 0x558265e53290 in should_skip_zero_counter tools/perf/util/stat-display.c:947:31 #4 0x558265e53290 in print_counter_aggrdata tools/perf/util/stat-display.c:985:18 #5 0x558265e51931 in print_counter tools/perf/util/stat-display.c:1110:3 torvalds#6 0x558265e51931 in evlist__print_counters tools/perf/util/stat-display.c:1571:5 torvalds#7 0x558265c8ec87 in print_counters tools/perf/builtin-stat.c:981:2 torvalds#8 0x558265c8cc71 in cmd_stat tools/perf/builtin-stat.c:2837:3 torvalds#9 0x558265bb9bd4 in run_builtin tools/perf/perf.c:323:11 torvalds#10 0x558265bb98eb in handle_internal_command tools/perf/perf.c:377:8 torvalds#11 0x558265bb9389 in run_argv tools/perf/perf.c:421:2 torvalds#12 0x558265bb9389 in main tools/perf/perf.c:537:3 ``` The issue was the use of testing a cpumap with NULL rather than using empty, as a map containing the dummy value isn't NULL and the -1 results in an empty aggr map being allocated which legitimately overflows when any member is accessed. Fixes: 8a96f45 ("perf stat: Avoid SEGV if core.cpus isn't set") Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <[email protected]> Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]> Cc: Adrian Hunter <[email protected]> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <[email protected]> Cc: Ian Rogers <[email protected]> Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> Cc: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Cc: Mark Rutland <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit ede72dc ] Fuzzing found that an invalid tracepoint name would create a memory leak with an address sanitizer build: ``` $ perf stat -e '*:o/' true event syntax error: '*:o/' \___ parser error Run 'perf list' for a list of valid events Usage: perf stat [<options>] [<command>] -e, --event <event> event selector. use 'perf list' to list available events ================================================================= ==59380==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks Direct leak of 4 byte(s) in 2 object(s) allocated from: #0 0x7f38ac07077b in __interceptor_strdup ../../../../src/libsanitizer/asan/asan_interceptors.cpp:439 #1 0x55f2f41be73b in str util/parse-events.l:49 #2 0x55f2f41d08e8 in parse_events_lex util/parse-events.l:338 #3 0x55f2f41dc3b1 in parse_events_parse util/parse-events-bison.c:1464 #4 0x55f2f410b8b3 in parse_events__scanner util/parse-events.c:1822 #5 0x55f2f410d1b9 in __parse_events util/parse-events.c:2094 torvalds#6 0x55f2f410e57f in parse_events_option util/parse-events.c:2279 torvalds#7 0x55f2f4427b56 in get_value tools/lib/subcmd/parse-options.c:251 torvalds#8 0x55f2f4428d98 in parse_short_opt tools/lib/subcmd/parse-options.c:351 torvalds#9 0x55f2f4429d80 in parse_options_step tools/lib/subcmd/parse-options.c:539 torvalds#10 0x55f2f442acb9 in parse_options_subcommand tools/lib/subcmd/parse-options.c:654 torvalds#11 0x55f2f3ec99fc in cmd_stat tools/perf/builtin-stat.c:2501 torvalds#12 0x55f2f4093289 in run_builtin tools/perf/perf.c:322 torvalds#13 0x55f2f40937f5 in handle_internal_command tools/perf/perf.c:375 torvalds#14 0x55f2f4093bbd in run_argv tools/perf/perf.c:419 torvalds#15 0x55f2f409412b in main tools/perf/perf.c:535 SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 4 byte(s) leaked in 2 allocation(s). ``` Fix by adding the missing destructor. Fixes: 865582c ("perf tools: Adds the tracepoint name parsing support") Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <[email protected]> Cc: He Kuang <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

This allows it to break the following circular locking dependency. Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: ====================================================== Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: 6.4.0-rc7+ torvalds#10 Not tainted Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: ------------------------------------------------------ Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: wireplumber/2236 is trying to acquire lock: Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: ffff8fca5320da18 (&fctx->lock){-...}-{2:2}, at: nouveau_fence_wait_uevent_handler+0x2b/0x100 [nouveau] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: but task is already holding lock: Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: ffff8fca41208610 (&event->list_lock#2){-...}-{2:2}, at: nvkm_event_ntfy+0x50/0xf0 [nouveau] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: which lock already depends on the new lock. Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: -> #3 (&event->list_lock#2){-...}-{2:2}: Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x4b/0x70 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nvkm_event_ntfy+0x50/0xf0 [nouveau] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: ga100_fifo_nonstall_intr+0x24/0x30 [nouveau] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nvkm_intr+0x12c/0x240 [nouveau] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x88/0x240 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: handle_irq_event+0x38/0x80 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: handle_edge_irq+0xa3/0x240 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: __common_interrupt+0x72/0x160 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: common_interrupt+0x60/0xe0 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: asm_common_interrupt+0x26/0x40 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: -> #2 (&device->intr.lock){-...}-{2:2}: Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x4b/0x70 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nvkm_inth_allow+0x2c/0x80 [nouveau] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nvkm_event_ntfy_state+0x181/0x250 [nouveau] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nvkm_event_ntfy_allow+0x63/0xd0 [nouveau] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nvkm_uevent_mthd+0x4d/0x70 [nouveau] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nvkm_ioctl+0x10b/0x250 [nouveau] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nvif_object_mthd+0xa8/0x1f0 [nouveau] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nvif_event_allow+0x2a/0xa0 [nouveau] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nouveau_fence_enable_signaling+0x78/0x80 [nouveau] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: __dma_fence_enable_signaling+0x5e/0x100 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: dma_fence_add_callback+0x4b/0xd0 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nouveau_cli_work_queue+0xae/0x110 [nouveau] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nouveau_gem_object_close+0x1d1/0x2a0 [nouveau] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: drm_gem_handle_delete+0x70/0xe0 [drm] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: drm_ioctl_kernel+0xa5/0x150 [drm] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: drm_ioctl+0x256/0x490 [drm] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nouveau_drm_ioctl+0x5a/0xb0 [nouveau] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: __x64_sys_ioctl+0x91/0xd0 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: do_syscall_64+0x3c/0x90 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0xdc Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: -> #1 (&event->refs_lock#4){....}-{2:2}: Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x4b/0x70 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nvkm_event_ntfy_state+0x37/0x250 [nouveau] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nvkm_event_ntfy_allow+0x63/0xd0 [nouveau] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nvkm_uevent_mthd+0x4d/0x70 [nouveau] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nvkm_ioctl+0x10b/0x250 [nouveau] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nvif_object_mthd+0xa8/0x1f0 [nouveau] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nvif_event_allow+0x2a/0xa0 [nouveau] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nouveau_fence_enable_signaling+0x78/0x80 [nouveau] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: __dma_fence_enable_signaling+0x5e/0x100 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: dma_fence_add_callback+0x4b/0xd0 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nouveau_cli_work_queue+0xae/0x110 [nouveau] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nouveau_gem_object_close+0x1d1/0x2a0 [nouveau] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: drm_gem_handle_delete+0x70/0xe0 [drm] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: drm_ioctl_kernel+0xa5/0x150 [drm] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: drm_ioctl+0x256/0x490 [drm] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nouveau_drm_ioctl+0x5a/0xb0 [nouveau] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: __x64_sys_ioctl+0x91/0xd0 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: do_syscall_64+0x3c/0x90 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0xdc Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: -> #0 (&fctx->lock){-...}-{2:2}: Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: __lock_acquire+0x14e3/0x2240 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: lock_acquire+0xc8/0x2a0 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x4b/0x70 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nouveau_fence_wait_uevent_handler+0x2b/0x100 [nouveau] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nvkm_client_event+0xf/0x20 [nouveau] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nvkm_event_ntfy+0x9b/0xf0 [nouveau] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: ga100_fifo_nonstall_intr+0x24/0x30 [nouveau] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nvkm_intr+0x12c/0x240 [nouveau] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x88/0x240 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: handle_irq_event+0x38/0x80 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: handle_edge_irq+0xa3/0x240 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: __common_interrupt+0x72/0x160 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: common_interrupt+0x60/0xe0 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: asm_common_interrupt+0x26/0x40 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: other info that might help us debug this: Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: Chain exists of: &fctx->lock --> &device->intr.lock --> &event->list_lock#2 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: Possible unsafe locking scenario: Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: CPU0 CPU1 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: ---- ---- Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: lock(&event->list_lock#2); Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: lock(&device->intr.lock); Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: lock(&event->list_lock#2); Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: lock(&fctx->lock); Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: *** DEADLOCK *** Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: 2 locks held by wireplumber/2236: Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: #0: ffff8fca53177bf8 (&device->intr.lock){-...}-{2:2}, at: nvkm_intr+0x29/0x240 [nouveau] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: #1: ffff8fca41208610 (&event->list_lock#2){-...}-{2:2}, at: nvkm_event_ntfy+0x50/0xf0 [nouveau] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: stack backtrace: Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: CPU: 6 PID: 2236 Comm: wireplumber Not tainted 6.4.0-rc7+ torvalds#10 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: Hardware name: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. Z390 I AORUS PRO WIFI/Z390 I AORUS PRO WIFI-CF, BIOS F8 11/05/2021 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: Call Trace: Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: <TASK> Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: dump_stack_lvl+0x5b/0x90 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: check_noncircular+0xe2/0x110 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: __lock_acquire+0x14e3/0x2240 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: lock_acquire+0xc8/0x2a0 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: ? nouveau_fence_wait_uevent_handler+0x2b/0x100 [nouveau] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: ? lock_acquire+0xc8/0x2a0 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x4b/0x70 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: ? nouveau_fence_wait_uevent_handler+0x2b/0x100 [nouveau] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nouveau_fence_wait_uevent_handler+0x2b/0x100 [nouveau] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nvkm_client_event+0xf/0x20 [nouveau] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nvkm_event_ntfy+0x9b/0xf0 [nouveau] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: ga100_fifo_nonstall_intr+0x24/0x30 [nouveau] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: nvkm_intr+0x12c/0x240 [nouveau] Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x88/0x240 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: handle_irq_event+0x38/0x80 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: handle_edge_irq+0xa3/0x240 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: __common_interrupt+0x72/0x160 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: common_interrupt+0x60/0xe0 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: asm_common_interrupt+0x26/0x40 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: RIP: 0033:0x7fb66174d700 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: Code: c1 e2 05 29 ca 8d 0c 10 0f be 07 84 c0 75 eb 89 c8 c3 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa e9 d7 0f fc ff 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 <f3> 0f 1e fa e9 c7 0f fc> Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: RSP: 002b:00007ffdd3c48438 EFLAGS: 00000206 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: RAX: 000055bb758763c0 RBX: 000055bb758752c0 RCX: 00000000000028b0 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: RDX: 000055bb758752c0 RSI: 000055bb75887490 RDI: 000055bb75862950 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: RBP: 00007ffdd3c48490 R08: 000055bb75873b10 R09: 0000000000000001 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: R10: 0000000000000004 R11: 000055bb7587f000 R12: 000055bb75887490 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: R13: 000055bb757f6280 R14: 000055bb758875c0 R15: 000055bb757f6280 Aug 10 07:01:29 dg1test kernel: </TASK> Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <[email protected]> Tested-by: Danilo Krummrich <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Danilo Krummrich <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Danilo Krummrich <[email protected]> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/[email protected]

[ Upstream commit 265f3ed ] All callers of work_on_cpu() share the same lock class key for all the functions queued. As a result the workqueue related locking scenario for a function A may be spuriously accounted as an inversion against the locking scenario of function B such as in the following model: long A(void *arg) { mutex_lock(&mutex); mutex_unlock(&mutex); } long B(void *arg) { } void launchA(void) { work_on_cpu(0, A, NULL); } void launchB(void) { mutex_lock(&mutex); work_on_cpu(1, B, NULL); mutex_unlock(&mutex); } launchA and launchB running concurrently have no chance to deadlock. However the above can be reported by lockdep as a possible locking inversion because the works containing A() and B() are treated as belonging to the same locking class. The following shows an existing example of such a spurious lockdep splat: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.6.0-rc1-00065-g934ebd6e5359 #35409 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kworker/0:1/9 is trying to acquire lock: ffffffff9bc72f30 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: _cpu_down+0x57/0x2b0 but task is already holding lock: ffff9e3bc0057e60 ((work_completion)(&wfc.work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_scheduled_works+0x216/0x500 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 ((work_completion)(&wfc.work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: __flush_work+0x83/0x4e0 work_on_cpu+0x97/0xc0 rcu_nocb_cpu_offload+0x62/0xb0 rcu_nocb_toggle+0xd0/0x1d0 kthread+0xe6/0x120 ret_from_fork+0x2f/0x40 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 -> #1 (rcu_state.barrier_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x81/0xc80 rcu_nocb_cpu_deoffload+0x38/0xb0 rcu_nocb_toggle+0x144/0x1d0 kthread+0xe6/0x120 ret_from_fork+0x2f/0x40 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 -> #0 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x1538/0x2500 lock_acquire+0xbf/0x2a0 percpu_down_write+0x31/0x200 _cpu_down+0x57/0x2b0 __cpu_down_maps_locked+0x10/0x20 work_for_cpu_fn+0x15/0x20 process_scheduled_works+0x2a7/0x500 worker_thread+0x173/0x330 kthread+0xe6/0x120 ret_from_fork+0x2f/0x40 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: cpu_hotplug_lock --> rcu_state.barrier_mutex --> (work_completion)(&wfc.work) Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock((work_completion)(&wfc.work)); lock(rcu_state.barrier_mutex); lock((work_completion)(&wfc.work)); lock(cpu_hotplug_lock); *** DEADLOCK *** 2 locks held by kworker/0:1/9: #0: ffff900481068b38 ((wq_completion)events){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_scheduled_works+0x212/0x500 #1: ffff9e3bc0057e60 ((work_completion)(&wfc.work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_scheduled_works+0x216/0x500 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 9 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 6.6.0-rc1-00065-g934ebd6e5359 #35409 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.12.0-59-gc9ba5276e321-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 Workqueue: events work_for_cpu_fn Call Trace: rcu-torture: rcu_torture_read_exit: Start of episode <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x4a/0x80 check_noncircular+0x132/0x150 __lock_acquire+0x1538/0x2500 lock_acquire+0xbf/0x2a0 ? _cpu_down+0x57/0x2b0 percpu_down_write+0x31/0x200 ? _cpu_down+0x57/0x2b0 _cpu_down+0x57/0x2b0 __cpu_down_maps_locked+0x10/0x20 work_for_cpu_fn+0x15/0x20 process_scheduled_works+0x2a7/0x500 worker_thread+0x173/0x330 ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10 kthread+0xe6/0x120 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork+0x2f/0x40 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30 </TASK Fix this with providing one lock class key per work_on_cpu() caller. Reported-and-tested-by: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit 52323ed ] syzbot reported a deadlock in lock_system_sleep() (see below). The write operation to "/sys/module/hibernate/parameters/compressor" conflicts with the registration of ieee80211 device, resulting in a deadlock when attempting to acquire system_transition_mutex under param_lock. To avoid this deadlock, change hibernate_compressor_param_set() to use mutex_trylock() for attempting to acquire system_transition_mutex and return -EBUSY when it fails. Task flags need not be saved or adjusted before calling mutex_trylock(&system_transition_mutex) because the caller is not going to end up waiting for this mutex and if it runs concurrently with system suspend in progress, it will be frozen properly when it returns to user space. syzbot report: syz-executor895/5833 is trying to acquire lock: ffffffff8e0828c8 (system_transition_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: lock_system_sleep+0x87/0xa0 kernel/power/main.c:56 but task is already holding lock: ffffffff8e07dc68 (param_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: kernel_param_lock kernel/params.c:607 [inline] ffffffff8e07dc68 (param_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: param_attr_store+0xe6/0x300 kernel/params.c:586 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #3 (param_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}: __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:585 [inline] __mutex_lock+0x19b/0xb10 kernel/locking/mutex.c:730 ieee80211_rate_control_ops_get net/mac80211/rate.c:220 [inline] rate_control_alloc net/mac80211/rate.c:266 [inline] ieee80211_init_rate_ctrl_alg+0x18d/0x6b0 net/mac80211/rate.c:1015 ieee80211_register_hw+0x20cd/0x4060 net/mac80211/main.c:1531 mac80211_hwsim_new_radio+0x304e/0x54e0 drivers/net/wireless/virtual/mac80211_hwsim.c:5558 init_mac80211_hwsim+0x432/0x8c0 drivers/net/wireless/virtual/mac80211_hwsim.c:6910 do_one_initcall+0x128/0x700 init/main.c:1257 do_initcall_level init/main.c:1319 [inline] do_initcalls init/main.c:1335 [inline] do_basic_setup init/main.c:1354 [inline] kernel_init_freeable+0x5c7/0x900 init/main.c:1568 kernel_init+0x1c/0x2b0 init/main.c:1457 ret_from_fork+0x45/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:148 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244 -> #2 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}: __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:585 [inline] __mutex_lock+0x19b/0xb10 kernel/locking/mutex.c:730 wg_pm_notification drivers/net/wireguard/device.c:80 [inline] wg_pm_notification+0x49/0x180 drivers/net/wireguard/device.c:64 notifier_call_chain+0xb7/0x410 kernel/notifier.c:85 notifier_call_chain_robust kernel/notifier.c:120 [inline] blocking_notifier_call_chain_robust kernel/notifier.c:345 [inline] blocking_notifier_call_chain_robust+0xc9/0x170 kernel/notifier.c:333 pm_notifier_call_chain_robust+0x27/0x60 kernel/power/main.c:102 snapshot_open+0x189/0x2b0 kernel/power/user.c:77 misc_open+0x35a/0x420 drivers/char/misc.c:179 chrdev_open+0x237/0x6a0 fs/char_dev.c:414 do_dentry_open+0x735/0x1c40 fs/open.c:956 vfs_open+0x82/0x3f0 fs/open.c:1086 do_open fs/namei.c:3830 [inline] path_openat+0x1e88/0x2d80 fs/namei.c:3989 do_filp_open+0x20c/0x470 fs/namei.c:4016 do_sys_openat2+0x17a/0x1e0 fs/open.c:1428 do_sys_open fs/open.c:1443 [inline] __do_sys_openat fs/open.c:1459 [inline] __se_sys_openat fs/open.c:1454 [inline] __x64_sys_openat+0x175/0x210 fs/open.c:1454 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xcd/0x250 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f -> #1 ((pm_chain_head).rwsem){++++}-{4:4}: down_read+0x9a/0x330 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1524 blocking_notifier_call_chain_robust kernel/notifier.c:344 [inline] blocking_notifier_call_chain_robust+0xa9/0x170 kernel/notifier.c:333 pm_notifier_call_chain_robust+0x27/0x60 kernel/power/main.c:102 snapshot_open+0x189/0x2b0 kernel/power/user.c:77 misc_open+0x35a/0x420 drivers/char/misc.c:179 chrdev_open+0x237/0x6a0 fs/char_dev.c:414 do_dentry_open+0x735/0x1c40 fs/open.c:956 vfs_open+0x82/0x3f0 fs/open.c:1086 do_open fs/namei.c:3830 [inline] path_openat+0x1e88/0x2d80 fs/namei.c:3989 do_filp_open+0x20c/0x470 fs/namei.c:4016 do_sys_openat2+0x17a/0x1e0 fs/open.c:1428 do_sys_open fs/open.c:1443 [inline] __do_sys_openat fs/open.c:1459 [inline] __se_sys_openat fs/open.c:1454 [inline] __x64_sys_openat+0x175/0x210 fs/open.c:1454 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xcd/0x250 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f -> #0 (system_transition_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}: check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3163 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3282 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3906 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x249e/0x3c40 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5228 lock_acquire.part.0+0x11b/0x380 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5851 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:585 [inline] __mutex_lock+0x19b/0xb10 kernel/locking/mutex.c:730 lock_system_sleep+0x87/0xa0 kernel/power/main.c:56 hibernate_compressor_param_set+0x1c/0x210 kernel/power/hibernate.c:1452 param_attr_store+0x18f/0x300 kernel/params.c:588 module_attr_store+0x55/0x80 kernel/params.c:924 sysfs_kf_write+0x117/0x170 fs/sysfs/file.c:139 kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x33d/0x500 fs/kernfs/file.c:334 new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:586 [inline] vfs_write+0x5ae/0x1150 fs/read_write.c:679 ksys_write+0x12b/0x250 fs/read_write.c:731 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xcd/0x250 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: system_transition_mutex --> rtnl_mutex --> param_lock Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(param_lock); lock(rtnl_mutex); lock(param_lock); lock(system_transition_mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** Reported-by: [email protected] Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=ace60642828c074eb913 Signed-off-by: Lizhi Xu <[email protected]> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected] [ rjw: New subject matching the code changes, changelog edits ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit b61e69b ] syzbot report a deadlock in diFree. [1] When calling "ioctl$LOOP_SET_STATUS64", the offset value passed in is 4, which does not match the mounted loop device, causing the mapping of the mounted loop device to be invalidated. When creating the directory and creating the inode of iag in diReadSpecial(), read the page of fixed disk inode (AIT) in raw mode in read_metapage(), the metapage data it returns is corrupted, which causes the nlink value of 0 to be assigned to the iag inode when executing copy_from_dinode(), which ultimately causes a deadlock when entering diFree(). To avoid this, first check the nlink value of dinode before setting iag inode. [1] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected 6.12.0-rc7-syzkaller-00212-g4a5df3796467 #0 Not tainted -------------------------------------------- syz-executor301/5309 is trying to acquire lock: ffff888044548920 (&(imap->im_aglock[index])){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: diFree+0x37c/0x2fb0 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:889 but task is already holding lock: ffff888044548920 (&(imap->im_aglock[index])){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: diAlloc+0x1b6/0x1630 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(&(imap->im_aglock[index])); lock(&(imap->im_aglock[index])); *** DEADLOCK *** May be due to missing lock nesting notation 5 locks held by syz-executor301/5309: #0: ffff8880422a4420 (sb_writers#9){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write+0x3f/0x90 fs/namespace.c:515 #1: ffff88804755b390 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#6/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: inode_lock_nested include/linux/fs.h:850 [inline] #1: ffff88804755b390 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#6/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: filename_create+0x260/0x540 fs/namei.c:4026 #2: ffff888044548920 (&(imap->im_aglock[index])){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: diAlloc+0x1b6/0x1630 #3: ffff888044548890 (&imap->im_freelock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: diNewIAG fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:2460 [inline] #3: ffff888044548890 (&imap->im_freelock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: diAllocExt fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1905 [inline] #3: ffff888044548890 (&imap->im_freelock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: diAllocAG+0x4b7/0x1e50 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1669 #4: ffff88804755a618 (&jfs_ip->rdwrlock/1){++++}-{3:3}, at: diNewIAG fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:2477 [inline] #4: ffff88804755a618 (&jfs_ip->rdwrlock/1){++++}-{3:3}, at: diAllocExt fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1905 [inline] #4: ffff88804755a618 (&jfs_ip->rdwrlock/1){++++}-{3:3}, at: diAllocAG+0x869/0x1e50 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1669 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5309 Comm: syz-executor301 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc7-syzkaller-00212-g4a5df3796467 #0 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2~bpo12+1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:120 print_deadlock_bug+0x483/0x620 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3037 check_deadlock kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3089 [inline] validate_chain+0x15e2/0x5920 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3891 __lock_acquire+0x1384/0x2050 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5202 lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5825 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:608 [inline] __mutex_lock+0x136/0xd70 kernel/locking/mutex.c:752 diFree+0x37c/0x2fb0 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:889 jfs_evict_inode+0x32d/0x440 fs/jfs/inode.c:156 evict+0x4e8/0x9b0 fs/inode.c:725 diFreeSpecial fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:552 [inline] duplicateIXtree+0x3c6/0x550 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:3022 diNewIAG fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:2597 [inline] diAllocExt fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1905 [inline] diAllocAG+0x17dc/0x1e50 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1669 diAlloc+0x1d2/0x1630 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c:1590 ialloc+0x8f/0x900 fs/jfs/jfs_inode.c:56 jfs_mkdir+0x1c5/0xba0 fs/jfs/namei.c:225 vfs_mkdir+0x2f9/0x4f0 fs/namei.c:4257 do_mkdirat+0x264/0x3a0 fs/namei.c:4280 __do_sys_mkdirat fs/namei.c:4295 [inline] __se_sys_mkdirat fs/namei.c:4293 [inline] __x64_sys_mkdirat+0x87/0xa0 fs/namei.c:4293 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f Reported-by: [email protected] Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=355da3b3a74881008e8f Signed-off-by: Edward Adam Davis <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Dave Kleikamp <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit 27b9180 ] With the device instance lock, there is now a possibility of a deadlock: [ 1.211455] ============================================ [ 1.211571] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected [ 1.211687] 6.14.0-rc5-01215-g032756b4ca7a-dirty #5 Not tainted [ 1.211823] -------------------------------------------- [ 1.211936] ip/184 is trying to acquire lock: [ 1.212032] ffff8881024a4c30 (&dev->lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: dev_set_allmulti+0x4e/0xb0 [ 1.212207] [ 1.212207] but task is already holding lock: [ 1.212332] ffff8881024a4c30 (&dev->lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: dev_open+0x50/0xb0 [ 1.212487] [ 1.212487] other info that might help us debug this: [ 1.212626] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 1.212626] [ 1.212751] CPU0 [ 1.212815] ---- [ 1.212871] lock(&dev->lock); [ 1.212944] lock(&dev->lock); [ 1.213016] [ 1.213016] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 1.213016] [ 1.213143] May be due to missing lock nesting notation [ 1.213143] [ 1.213294] 3 locks held by ip/184: [ 1.213371] #0: ffffffff838b53e0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: rtnl_nets_lock+0x1b/0xa0 [ 1.213543] #1: ffffffff84e5fc70 (&net->rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: rtnl_nets_lock+0x37/0xa0 [ 1.213727] #2: ffff8881024a4c30 (&dev->lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: dev_open+0x50/0xb0 [ 1.213895] [ 1.213895] stack backtrace: [ 1.213991] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 184 Comm: ip Not tainted 6.14.0-rc5-01215-g032756b4ca7a-dirty #5 [ 1.213993] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Arch Linux 1.16.3-1-1 04/01/2014 [ 1.213994] Call Trace: [ 1.213995] <TASK> [ 1.213996] dump_stack_lvl+0x8e/0xd0 [ 1.214000] print_deadlock_bug+0x28b/0x2a0 [ 1.214020] lock_acquire+0xea/0x2a0 [ 1.214027] __mutex_lock+0xbf/0xd40 [ 1.214038] dev_set_allmulti+0x4e/0xb0 # real_dev->flags & IFF_ALLMULTI [ 1.214040] vlan_dev_open+0xa5/0x170 # ndo_open on vlandev [ 1.214042] __dev_open+0x145/0x270 [ 1.214046] __dev_change_flags+0xb0/0x1e0 [ 1.214051] netif_change_flags+0x22/0x60 # IFF_UP vlandev [ 1.214053] dev_change_flags+0x61/0xb0 # for each device in group from dev->vlan_info [ 1.214055] vlan_device_event+0x766/0x7c0 # on netdevsim0 [ 1.214058] notifier_call_chain+0x78/0x120 [ 1.214062] netif_open+0x6d/0x90 [ 1.214064] dev_open+0x5b/0xb0 # locks netdevsim0 [ 1.214066] bond_enslave+0x64c/0x1230 [ 1.214075] do_set_master+0x175/0x1e0 # on netdevsim0 [ 1.214077] do_setlink+0x516/0x13b0 [ 1.214094] rtnl_newlink+0xaba/0xb80 [ 1.214132] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x440/0x490 [ 1.214144] netlink_rcv_skb+0xeb/0x120 [ 1.214150] netlink_unicast+0x1f9/0x320 [ 1.214153] netlink_sendmsg+0x346/0x3f0 [ 1.214157] __sock_sendmsg+0x86/0xb0 [ 1.214160] ____sys_sendmsg+0x1c8/0x220 [ 1.214164] ___sys_sendmsg+0x28f/0x2d0 [ 1.214179] __x64_sys_sendmsg+0xef/0x140 [ 1.214184] do_syscall_64+0xec/0x1d0 [ 1.214190] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f [ 1.214191] RIP: 0033:0x7f2d1b4a7e56 Device setup: netdevsim0 (down) ^ ^ bond netdevsim1.100@netdevsim1 allmulticast=on (down) When we enslave the lower device (netdevsim0) which has a vlan, we propagate vlan's allmuti/promisc flags during ndo_open. This causes (re)locking on of the real_dev. Propagate allmulti/promisc on flags change, not on the open. There is a slight semantics change that vlans that are down now propagate the flags, but this seems unlikely to result in the real issues. Reproducer: echo 0 1 > /sys/bus/netdevsim/new_device dev_path=$(ls -d /sys/bus/netdevsim/devices/netdevsim0/net/*) dev=$(echo $dev_path | rev | cut -d/ -f1 | rev) ip link set dev $dev name netdevsim0 ip link set dev netdevsim0 up ip link add link netdevsim0 name netdevsim0.100 type vlan id 100 ip link set dev netdevsim0.100 allmulticast on down ip link add name bond1 type bond mode 802.3ad ip link set dev netdevsim0 down ip link set dev netdevsim0 master bond1 ip link set dev bond1 up ip link show Reported-by: [email protected] Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/Z9CfXjLMKn6VLG5d@mini-arch/T/#m15ba130f53227c883e79fb969687d69d670337a0 Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <[email protected]> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

commit 93ae6e6 upstream. We have recently seen report of lockdep circular lock dependency warnings on platforms like Skylake and Kabylake: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.14.0-rc6-CI_DRM_16276-gca2c04fe76e8+ #1 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ swapper/0/1 is trying to acquire lock: ffffffff8360ee48 (iommu_probe_device_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: iommu_probe_device+0x1d/0x70 but task is already holding lock: ffff888102c7efa8 (&device->physical_node_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: intel_iommu_init+0xe75/0x11f0 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> torvalds#6 (&device->physical_node_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0xb4/0xe40 mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x30 intel_iommu_init+0xe75/0x11f0 pci_iommu_init+0x13/0x70 do_one_initcall+0x62/0x3f0 kernel_init_freeable+0x3da/0x6a0 kernel_init+0x1b/0x200 ret_from_fork+0x44/0x70 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 -> #5 (dmar_global_lock){++++}-{3:3}: down_read+0x43/0x1d0 enable_drhd_fault_handling+0x21/0x110 cpuhp_invoke_callback+0x4c6/0x870 cpuhp_issue_call+0xbf/0x1f0 __cpuhp_setup_state_cpuslocked+0x111/0x320 __cpuhp_setup_state+0xb0/0x220 irq_remap_enable_fault_handling+0x3f/0xa0 apic_intr_mode_init+0x5c/0x110 x86_late_time_init+0x24/0x40 start_kernel+0x895/0xbd0 x86_64_start_reservations+0x18/0x30 x86_64_start_kernel+0xbf/0x110 common_startup_64+0x13e/0x141 -> #4 (cpuhp_state_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0xb4/0xe40 mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x30 __cpuhp_setup_state_cpuslocked+0x67/0x320 __cpuhp_setup_state+0xb0/0x220 page_alloc_init_cpuhp+0x2d/0x60 mm_core_init+0x18/0x2c0 start_kernel+0x576/0xbd0 x86_64_start_reservations+0x18/0x30 x86_64_start_kernel+0xbf/0x110 common_startup_64+0x13e/0x141 -> #3 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}: __cpuhp_state_add_instance+0x4f/0x220 iova_domain_init_rcaches+0x214/0x280 iommu_setup_dma_ops+0x1a4/0x710 iommu_device_register+0x17d/0x260 intel_iommu_init+0xda4/0x11f0 pci_iommu_init+0x13/0x70 do_one_initcall+0x62/0x3f0 kernel_init_freeable+0x3da/0x6a0 kernel_init+0x1b/0x200 ret_from_fork+0x44/0x70 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 -> #2 (&domain->iova_cookie->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0xb4/0xe40 mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x30 iommu_setup_dma_ops+0x16b/0x710 iommu_device_register+0x17d/0x260 intel_iommu_init+0xda4/0x11f0 pci_iommu_init+0x13/0x70 do_one_initcall+0x62/0x3f0 kernel_init_freeable+0x3da/0x6a0 kernel_init+0x1b/0x200 ret_from_fork+0x44/0x70 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 -> #1 (&group->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0xb4/0xe40 mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x30 __iommu_probe_device+0x24c/0x4e0 probe_iommu_group+0x2b/0x50 bus_for_each_dev+0x7d/0xe0 iommu_device_register+0xe1/0x260 intel_iommu_init+0xda4/0x11f0 pci_iommu_init+0x13/0x70 do_one_initcall+0x62/0x3f0 kernel_init_freeable+0x3da/0x6a0 kernel_init+0x1b/0x200 ret_from_fork+0x44/0x70 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 -> #0 (iommu_probe_device_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x1637/0x2810 lock_acquire+0xc9/0x300 __mutex_lock+0xb4/0xe40 mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x30 iommu_probe_device+0x1d/0x70 intel_iommu_init+0xe90/0x11f0 pci_iommu_init+0x13/0x70 do_one_initcall+0x62/0x3f0 kernel_init_freeable+0x3da/0x6a0 kernel_init+0x1b/0x200 ret_from_fork+0x44/0x70 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: iommu_probe_device_lock --> dmar_global_lock --> &device->physical_node_lock Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&device->physical_node_lock); lock(dmar_global_lock); lock(&device->physical_node_lock); lock(iommu_probe_device_lock); *** DEADLOCK *** This driver uses a global lock to protect the list of enumerated DMA remapping units. It is necessary due to the driver's support for dynamic addition and removal of remapping units at runtime. Two distinct code paths require iteration over this remapping unit list: - Device registration and probing: the driver iterates the list to register each remapping unit with the upper layer IOMMU framework and subsequently probe the devices managed by that unit. - Global configuration: Upper layer components may also iterate the list to apply configuration changes. The lock acquisition order between these two code paths was reversed. This caused lockdep warnings, indicating a risk of deadlock. Fix this warning by releasing the global lock before invoking upper layer interfaces for device registration. Fixes: b150654 ("iommu/vt-d: Fix suspicious RCU usage") Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/SJ1PR11MB612953431F94F18C954C4A9CB9D32@SJ1PR11MB6129.namprd11.prod.outlook.com/ Tested-by: Chaitanya Kumar Borah <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

There is a potential deadlock if we do report zones in an IO context, detailed in below lockdep report. When one process do a report zones and another process freezes the block device, the report zones side cannot allocate a tag because the freeze is already started. This can thus result in new block group creation to hang forever, blocking the write path. Thankfully, a new block group should be created on empty zones. So, reporting the zones is not necessary and we can set the write pointer = 0 and load the zone capacity from the block layer using bdev_zone_capacity() helper. ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.14.0-rc1 torvalds#252 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ modprobe/1110 is trying to acquire lock: ffff888100ac83e0 ((work_completion)(&(&wb->dwork)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __flush_work+0x38f/0xb60 but task is already holding lock: ffff8881205b6f20 (&q->q_usage_counter(queue)torvalds#16){++++}-{0:0}, at: sd_remove+0x85/0x130 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> CachyOS#3 (&q->q_usage_counter(queue)torvalds#16){++++}-{0:0}: blk_queue_enter+0x3d9/0x500 blk_mq_alloc_request+0x47d/0x8e0 scsi_execute_cmd+0x14f/0xb80 sd_zbc_do_report_zones+0x1c1/0x470 sd_zbc_report_zones+0x362/0xd60 blkdev_report_zones+0x1b1/0x2e0 btrfs_get_dev_zones+0x215/0x7e0 [btrfs] btrfs_load_block_group_zone_info+0x6d2/0x2c10 [btrfs] btrfs_make_block_group+0x36b/0x870 [btrfs] btrfs_create_chunk+0x147d/0x2320 [btrfs] btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x2ce/0xcf0 [btrfs] start_transaction+0xce6/0x1620 [btrfs] btrfs_uuid_scan_kthread+0x4ee/0x5b0 [btrfs] kthread+0x39d/0x750 ret_from_fork+0x30/0x70 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 -> CachyOS#2 (&fs_info->dev_replace.rwsem){++++}-{4:4}: down_read+0x9b/0x470 btrfs_map_block+0x2ce/0x2ce0 [btrfs] btrfs_submit_chunk+0x2d4/0x16c0 [btrfs] btrfs_submit_bbio+0x16/0x30 [btrfs] btree_write_cache_pages+0xb5a/0xf90 [btrfs] do_writepages+0x17f/0x7b0 __writeback_single_inode+0x114/0xb00 writeback_sb_inodes+0x52b/0xe00 wb_writeback+0x1a7/0x800 wb_workfn+0x12a/0xbd0 process_one_work+0x85a/0x1460 worker_thread+0x5e2/0xfc0 kthread+0x39d/0x750 ret_from_fork+0x30/0x70 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 -> CachyOS#1 (&fs_info->zoned_meta_io_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}: __mutex_lock+0x1aa/0x1360 btree_write_cache_pages+0x252/0xf90 [btrfs] do_writepages+0x17f/0x7b0 __writeback_single_inode+0x114/0xb00 writeback_sb_inodes+0x52b/0xe00 wb_writeback+0x1a7/0x800 wb_workfn+0x12a/0xbd0 process_one_work+0x85a/0x1460 worker_thread+0x5e2/0xfc0 kthread+0x39d/0x750 ret_from_fork+0x30/0x70 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 -> #0 ((work_completion)(&(&wb->dwork)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x2f52/0x5ea0 lock_acquire+0x1b1/0x540 __flush_work+0x3ac/0xb60 wb_shutdown+0x15b/0x1f0 bdi_unregister+0x172/0x5b0 del_gendisk+0x841/0xa20 sd_remove+0x85/0x130 device_release_driver_internal+0x368/0x520 bus_remove_device+0x1f1/0x3f0 device_del+0x3bd/0x9c0 __scsi_remove_device+0x272/0x340 scsi_forget_host+0xf7/0x170 scsi_remove_host+0xd2/0x2a0 sdebug_driver_remove+0x52/0x2f0 [scsi_debug] device_release_driver_internal+0x368/0x520 bus_remove_device+0x1f1/0x3f0 device_del+0x3bd/0x9c0 device_unregister+0x13/0xa0 sdebug_do_remove_host+0x1fb/0x290 [scsi_debug] scsi_debug_exit+0x17/0x70 [scsi_debug] __do_sys_delete_module.isra.0+0x321/0x520 do_syscall_64+0x93/0x180 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: (work_completion)(&(&wb->dwork)->work) --> &fs_info->dev_replace.rwsem --> &q->q_usage_counter(queue)torvalds#16 Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&q->q_usage_counter(queue)torvalds#16); lock(&fs_info->dev_replace.rwsem); lock(&q->q_usage_counter(queue)torvalds#16); lock((work_completion)(&(&wb->dwork)->work)); *** DEADLOCK *** 5 locks held by modprobe/1110: #0: ffff88811f7bc108 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: device_release_driver_internal+0x8f/0x520 CachyOS#1: ffff8881022ee0e0 (&shost->scan_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: scsi_remove_host+0x20/0x2a0 CachyOS#2: ffff88811b4c4378 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: device_release_driver_internal+0x8f/0x520 CachyOS#3: ffff8881205b6f20 (&q->q_usage_counter(queue)torvalds#16){++++}-{0:0}, at: sd_remove+0x85/0x130 CachyOS#4: ffffffffa3284360 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: __flush_work+0xda/0xb60 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 1110 Comm: modprobe Not tainted 6.14.0-rc1 torvalds#252 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-3.fc41 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x6a/0x90 print_circular_bug.cold+0x1e0/0x274 check_noncircular+0x306/0x3f0 ? __pfx_check_noncircular+0x10/0x10 ? mark_lock+0xf5/0x1650 ? __pfx_check_irq_usage+0x10/0x10 ? lockdep_lock+0xca/0x1c0 ? __pfx_lockdep_lock+0x10/0x10 __lock_acquire+0x2f52/0x5ea0 ? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_mark_lock+0x10/0x10 lock_acquire+0x1b1/0x540 ? __flush_work+0x38f/0xb60 ? __pfx_lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_lock_release+0x10/0x10 ? mark_held_locks+0x94/0xe0 ? __flush_work+0x38f/0xb60 __flush_work+0x3ac/0xb60 ? __flush_work+0x38f/0xb60 ? __pfx_mark_lock+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx___flush_work+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_wq_barrier_func+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx___might_resched+0x10/0x10 ? mark_held_locks+0x94/0xe0 wb_shutdown+0x15b/0x1f0 bdi_unregister+0x172/0x5b0 ? __pfx_bdi_unregister+0x10/0x10 ? up_write+0x1ba/0x510 del_gendisk+0x841/0xa20 ? __pfx_del_gendisk+0x10/0x10 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x35/0x60 ? __pm_runtime_resume+0x79/0x110 sd_remove+0x85/0x130 device_release_driver_internal+0x368/0x520 ? kobject_put+0x5d/0x4a0 bus_remove_device+0x1f1/0x3f0 device_del+0x3bd/0x9c0 ? __pfx_device_del+0x10/0x10 __scsi_remove_device+0x272/0x340 scsi_forget_host+0xf7/0x170 scsi_remove_host+0xd2/0x2a0 sdebug_driver_remove+0x52/0x2f0 [scsi_debug] ? kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0xc0/0xf0 device_release_driver_internal+0x368/0x520 ? kobject_put+0x5d/0x4a0 bus_remove_device+0x1f1/0x3f0 device_del+0x3bd/0x9c0 ? __pfx_device_del+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx___mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x10/0x10 device_unregister+0x13/0xa0 sdebug_do_remove_host+0x1fb/0x290 [scsi_debug] scsi_debug_exit+0x17/0x70 [scsi_debug] __do_sys_delete_module.isra.0+0x321/0x520 ? __pfx___do_sys_delete_module.isra.0+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_slab_free_after_rcu_debug+0x10/0x10 ? kasan_save_stack+0x2c/0x50 ? kasan_record_aux_stack+0xa3/0xb0 ? __call_rcu_common.constprop.0+0xc4/0xfb0 ? kmem_cache_free+0x3a0/0x590 ? __x64_sys_close+0x78/0xd0 do_syscall_64+0x93/0x180 ? lock_is_held_type+0xd5/0x130 ? __call_rcu_common.constprop.0+0x3c0/0xfb0 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x78/0x100 ? __call_rcu_common.constprop.0+0x3c0/0xfb0 ? __pfx___call_rcu_common.constprop.0+0x10/0x10 ? kmem_cache_free+0x3a0/0x590 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x16d/0x400 ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x78/0x100 ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180 ? __pfx___x64_sys_openat+0x10/0x10 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x16d/0x400 ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x78/0x100 ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e RIP: 0033:0x7f436712b68b RSP: 002b:00007ffe9f1a8658 EFLAGS: 00000206 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000b0 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00005559b367fd80 RCX: 00007f436712b68b RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000800 RDI: 00005559b367fde8 RBP: 00007ffe9f1a8680 R08: 1999999999999999 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 00007f43671a5fe0 R11: 0000000000000206 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 00007ffe9f1a86b0 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 </TASK> Reported-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <[email protected]> CC: <[email protected]> # 6.13+ Tested-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit a104042 ] The ieee80211 skb control block key (set when skb was queued) could have been removed before ieee80211_tx_dequeue() call. ieee80211_tx_dequeue() already called ieee80211_tx_h_select_key() to get the current key, but the latter do not update the key in skb control block in case it is NULL. Because some drivers actually use this key in their TX callbacks (e.g. ath1{1,2}k_mac_op_tx()) this could lead to the use after free below: BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in ath11k_mac_op_tx+0x590/0x61c Read of size 4 at addr ffffff803083c248 by task kworker/u16:4/1440 CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 1440 Comm: kworker/u16:4 Not tainted 6.13.0-ge128f627f404 #2 Hardware name: HW (DT) Workqueue: bat_events batadv_send_outstanding_bcast_packet Call trace: show_stack+0x14/0x1c (C) dump_stack_lvl+0x58/0x74 print_report+0x164/0x4c0 kasan_report+0xac/0xe8 __asan_report_load4_noabort+0x1c/0x24 ath11k_mac_op_tx+0x590/0x61c ieee80211_handle_wake_tx_queue+0x12c/0x1c8 ieee80211_queue_skb+0xdcc/0x1b4c ieee80211_tx+0x1ec/0x2bc ieee80211_xmit+0x224/0x324 __ieee80211_subif_start_xmit+0x85c/0xcf8 ieee80211_subif_start_xmit+0xc0/0xec4 dev_hard_start_xmit+0xf4/0x28c __dev_queue_xmit+0x6ac/0x318c batadv_send_skb_packet+0x38c/0x4b0 batadv_send_outstanding_bcast_packet+0x110/0x328 process_one_work+0x578/0xc10 worker_thread+0x4bc/0xc7c kthread+0x2f8/0x380 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 Allocated by task 1906: kasan_save_stack+0x28/0x4c kasan_save_track+0x1c/0x40 kasan_save_alloc_info+0x3c/0x4c __kasan_kmalloc+0xac/0xb0 __kmalloc_noprof+0x1b4/0x380 ieee80211_key_alloc+0x3c/0xb64 ieee80211_add_key+0x1b4/0x71c nl80211_new_key+0x2b4/0x5d8 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit+0x198/0x240 <...> Freed by task 1494: kasan_save_stack+0x28/0x4c kasan_save_track+0x1c/0x40 kasan_save_free_info+0x48/0x94 __kasan_slab_free+0x48/0x60 kfree+0xc8/0x31c kfree_sensitive+0x70/0x80 ieee80211_key_free_common+0x10c/0x174 ieee80211_free_keys+0x188/0x46c ieee80211_stop_mesh+0x70/0x2cc ieee80211_leave_mesh+0x1c/0x60 cfg80211_leave_mesh+0xe0/0x280 cfg80211_leave+0x1e0/0x244 <...> Reset SKB control block key before calling ieee80211_tx_h_select_key() to avoid that. Fixes: bb42f2d ("mac80211: Move reorder-sensitive TX handlers to after TXQ dequeue") Signed-off-by: Remi Pommarel <[email protected]> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/06aa507b853ca385ceded81c18b0a6dd0f081bc8.1742833382.git.repk@triplefau.lt Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit 752e221 ] SMC consists of two sockets: smc_sock and kernel TCP socket. Currently, there are two ways of creating the sockets, and syzbot reported a lockdep splat [0] for the newer way introduced by commit d25a92c ("net/smc: Introduce IPPROTO_SMC"). socket(AF_SMC , SOCK_STREAM, SMCPROTO_SMC or SMCPROTO_SMC6) socket(AF_INET or AF_INET6, SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_SMC) When a socket is allocated, sock_lock_init() sets a lockdep lock class to sk->sk_lock.slock based on its protocol family. In the IPPROTO_SMC case, AF_INET or AF_INET6 lock class is assigned to smc_sock. The repro sets IPV6_JOIN_ANYCAST for IPv6 UDP and SMC socket and exercises smc_switch_to_fallback() for IPPROTO_SMC. 1. smc_switch_to_fallback() is called under lock_sock() and holds smc->clcsock_release_lock. sk_lock-AF_INET6 -> &smc->clcsock_release_lock (sk_lock-AF_SMC) 2. Setting IPV6_JOIN_ANYCAST to SMC holds smc->clcsock_release_lock and calls setsockopt() for the kernel TCP socket, which holds RTNL and the kernel socket's lock_sock(). &smc->clcsock_release_lock -> rtnl_mutex (-> k-sk_lock-AF_INET6) 3. Setting IPV6_JOIN_ANYCAST to UDP holds RTNL and lock_sock(). rtnl_mutex -> sk_lock-AF_INET6 Then, lockdep detects a false-positive circular locking, .-> sk_lock-AF_INET6 -> &smc->clcsock_release_lock -> rtnl_mutex -. `-----------------------------------------------------------------' but IPPROTO_SMC should have the same locking rule as AF_SMC. sk_lock-AF_SMC -> &smc->clcsock_release_lock -> rtnl_mutex -> k-sk_lock-AF_INET6 Let's set the same lock class for smc_sock. Given AF_SMC uses the same lock class for SMCPROTO_SMC and SMCPROTO_SMC6, we do not need to separate the class for AF_INET and AF_INET6. [0]: WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.14.0-rc3-syzkaller-00267-gff202c5028a1 #0 Not tainted syz.4.1528/11571 is trying to acquire lock: ffffffff8fef8de8 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: ipv6_sock_ac_close+0xd9/0x110 net/ipv6/anycast.c:220 but task is already holding lock: ffff888027f596a8 (&smc->clcsock_release_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: smc_clcsock_release+0x75/0xe0 net/smc/smc_close.c:30 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (&smc->clcsock_release_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}: __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:585 [inline] __mutex_lock+0x19b/0xb10 kernel/locking/mutex.c:730 smc_switch_to_fallback+0x2d/0xa00 net/smc/af_smc.c:903 smc_sendmsg+0x13d/0x520 net/smc/af_smc.c:2781 sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:718 [inline] __sock_sendmsg net/socket.c:733 [inline] ____sys_sendmsg+0xaaf/0xc90 net/socket.c:2573 ___sys_sendmsg+0x135/0x1e0 net/socket.c:2627 __sys_sendmsg+0x16e/0x220 net/socket.c:2659 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xcd/0x250 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f -> #1 (sk_lock-AF_INET6){+.+.}-{0:0}: lock_sock_nested+0x3a/0xf0 net/core/sock.c:3645 lock_sock include/net/sock.h:1624 [inline] sockopt_lock_sock net/core/sock.c:1133 [inline] sockopt_lock_sock+0x54/0x70 net/core/sock.c:1124 do_ipv6_setsockopt+0x2160/0x4520 net/ipv6/ipv6_sockglue.c:567 ipv6_setsockopt+0xcb/0x170 net/ipv6/ipv6_sockglue.c:993 udpv6_setsockopt+0x7d/0xd0 net/ipv6/udp.c:1850 do_sock_setsockopt+0x222/0x480 net/socket.c:2303 __sys_setsockopt+0x1a0/0x230 net/socket.c:2328 __do_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2334 [inline] __se_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2331 [inline] __x64_sys_setsockopt+0xbd/0x160 net/socket.c:2331 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xcd/0x250 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f -> #0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}: check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3163 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3282 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3906 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x249e/0x3c40 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5228 lock_acquire.part.0+0x11b/0x380 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5851 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:585 [inline] __mutex_lock+0x19b/0xb10 kernel/locking/mutex.c:730 ipv6_sock_ac_close+0xd9/0x110 net/ipv6/anycast.c:220 inet6_release+0x47/0x70 net/ipv6/af_inet6.c:485 __sock_release net/socket.c:647 [inline] sock_release+0x8e/0x1d0 net/socket.c:675 smc_clcsock_release+0xb7/0xe0 net/smc/smc_close.c:34 __smc_release+0x5c2/0x880 net/smc/af_smc.c:301 smc_release+0x1fc/0x5f0 net/smc/af_smc.c:344 __sock_release+0xb0/0x270 net/socket.c:647 sock_close+0x1c/0x30 net/socket.c:1398 __fput+0x3ff/0xb70 fs/file_table.c:464 task_work_run+0x14e/0x250 kernel/task_work.c:227 resume_user_mode_work include/linux/resume_user_mode.h:50 [inline] exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:114 [inline] exit_to_user_mode_prepare include/linux/entry-common.h:329 [inline] __syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work kernel/entry/common.c:207 [inline] syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x27b/0x2a0 kernel/entry/common.c:218 do_syscall_64+0xda/0x250 arch/x86/entry/common.c:89 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: rtnl_mutex --> sk_lock-AF_INET6 --> &smc->clcsock_release_lock Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&smc->clcsock_release_lock); lock(sk_lock-AF_INET6); lock(&smc->clcsock_release_lock); lock(rtnl_mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 2 locks held by syz.4.1528/11571: #0: ffff888077e88208 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#10){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:877 [inline] #0: ffff888077e88208 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#10){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: __sock_release+0x86/0x270 net/socket.c:646 #1: ffff888027f596a8 (&smc->clcsock_release_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: smc_clcsock_release+0x75/0xe0 net/smc/smc_close.c:30 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 11571 Comm: syz.4.1528 Not tainted 6.14.0-rc3-syzkaller-00267-gff202c5028a1 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 02/12/2025 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x116/0x1f0 lib/dump_stack.c:120 print_circular_bug+0x490/0x760 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2076 check_noncircular+0x31a/0x400 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2208 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3163 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3282 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3906 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x249e/0x3c40 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5228 lock_acquire.part.0+0x11b/0x380 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5851 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:585 [inline] __mutex_lock+0x19b/0xb10 kernel/locking/mutex.c:730 ipv6_sock_ac_close+0xd9/0x110 net/ipv6/anycast.c:220 inet6_release+0x47/0x70 net/ipv6/af_inet6.c:485 __sock_release net/socket.c:647 [inline] sock_release+0x8e/0x1d0 net/socket.c:675 smc_clcsock_release+0xb7/0xe0 net/smc/smc_close.c:34 __smc_release+0x5c2/0x880 net/smc/af_smc.c:301 smc_release+0x1fc/0x5f0 net/smc/af_smc.c:344 __sock_release+0xb0/0x270 net/socket.c:647 sock_close+0x1c/0x30 net/socket.c:1398 __fput+0x3ff/0xb70 fs/file_table.c:464 task_work_run+0x14e/0x250 kernel/task_work.c:227 resume_user_mode_work include/linux/resume_user_mode.h:50 [inline] exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:114 [inline] exit_to_user_mode_prepare include/linux/entry-common.h:329 [inline] __syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work kernel/entry/common.c:207 [inline] syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x27b/0x2a0 kernel/entry/common.c:218 do_syscall_64+0xda/0x250 arch/x86/entry/common.c:89 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7f8b4b38d169 Code: ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 40 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 a8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007ffe4efd22d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000001b4 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 00000000000b14a3 RCX: 00007f8b4b38d169 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 000000000000001e RDI: 0000000000000003 RBP: 00007f8b4b5a7ba0 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 000000114efd25cf R10: 00007f8b4b200000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f8b4b5a5fac R13: 00007f8b4b5a5fa0 R14: ffffffffffffffff R15: 00007ffe4efd23f0 </TASK> Fixes: d25a92c ("net/smc: Introduce IPPROTO_SMC") Reported-by: [email protected] Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=be6f4b383534d88989f7 Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Wenjia Zhang <[email protected]> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

commit d54d610 upstream. Communicating with the hypervisor using the shared GHCB page requires clearing the C bit in the mapping of that page. When executing in the context of the EFI boot services, the page tables are owned by the firmware, and this manipulation is not possible. So switch to a different API for accepting memory in SEV-SNP guests, one which is actually supported at the point during boot where the EFI stub may need to accept memory, but the SEV-SNP init code has not executed yet. For simplicity, also switch the memory acceptance carried out by the decompressor when not booting via EFI - this only involves the allocation for the decompressed kernel, and is generally only called after kexec, as normal boot will jump straight into the kernel from the EFI stub. Fixes: 6c32117 ("x86/sev: Add SNP-specific unaccepted memory support") Tested-by: Tom Lendacky <[email protected]> Co-developed-by: Tom Lendacky <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]> Cc: Dionna Amalie Glaze <[email protected]> Cc: Kevin Loughlin <[email protected]> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <[email protected]> Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] # discussion thread #1 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] # discussion thread #2 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] # final submission Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

commit afcdf51 upstream. Commit 7da55c2 ("drm/amd/display: Remove incorrect FP context start") removes the FP context protection of dml2_create(), and it said "All the DC_FP_START/END should be used before call anything from DML2". However, dml2_init()/dml21_init() are not protected from their callers, causing such errors: do_fpu invoked from kernel context![#1]: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 239 Comm: kworker/0:5 Not tainted 6.14.0-rc6+ #2 Workqueue: events work_for_cpu_fn pc ffff80000319de80 ra ffff80000319de5c tp 900000010575c000 sp 900000010575f840 a0 0000000000000000 a1 900000012f210130 a2 900000012f000000 a3 ffff80000357e268 a4 ffff80000357e260 a5 900000012ea52cf0 a6 0000000400000004 a7 0000012c00001388 t0 00001900000015e0 t1 ffff80000379d000 t2 0000000010624dd3 t3 0000006400000014 t4 00000000000003e8 t5 0000005000000018 t6 0000000000000020 t7 0000000f00000064 t8 000000000000002f u0 5f5e9200f8901912 s9 900000012d380010 s0 900000012ea51fd8 s1 900000012f000000 s2 9000000109296000 s3 0000000000000001 s4 0000000000001fd8 s5 0000000000000001 s6 ffff800003415000 s7 900000012d390000 s8 ffff800003211f80 ra: ffff80000319de5c dml21_apply_soc_bb_overrides+0x3c/0x960 [amdgpu] ERA: ffff80000319de80 dml21_apply_soc_bb_overrides+0x60/0x960 [amdgpu] CRMD: 000000b0 (PLV0 -IE -DA +PG DACF=CC DACM=CC -WE) PRMD: 00000004 (PPLV0 +PIE -PWE) EUEN: 00000000 (-FPE -SXE -ASXE -BTE) ECFG: 00071c1d (LIE=0,2-4,10-12 VS=7) ESTAT: 000f0000 [FPD] (IS= ECode=15 EsubCode=0) PRID: 0014d010 (Loongson-64bit, Loongson-3C6000/S) Process kworker/0:5 (pid: 239, threadinfo=00000000927eadc6, task=000000008fd31682) Stack : 00040dc000003164 0000000000000001 900000012f210130 900000012eabeeb8 900000012f000000 ffff80000319fe48 900000012f210000 900000012f210130 900000012f000000 900000012eabeeb8 0000000000000001 ffff8000031a0064 900000010575f9f0 900000012f210130 900000012eac0000 900000012ea80000 900000012f000000 ffff8000031cefc4 900000010575f9f0 ffff8000035859c0 ffff800003414000 900000010575fa78 900000012f000000 ffff8000031b4c50 0000000000000000 9000000101c9d700 9000000109c40000 5f5e9200f8901912 900000012d3c4bd0 900000012d3c5000 ffff8000034aed18 900000012d380010 900000012d3c4bd0 ffff800003414000 900000012d380000 ffff800002ea49dc 0000000000000001 900000012d3c6000 00000000ffffe423 0000000000010000 ... Call Trace: [<ffff80000319de80>] dml21_apply_soc_bb_overrides+0x60/0x960 [amdgpu] [<ffff80000319fe44>] dml21_init+0xa4/0x280 [amdgpu] [<ffff8000031a0060>] dml21_create+0x40/0x80 [amdgpu] [<ffff8000031cefc0>] dc_state_create+0x100/0x160 [amdgpu] [<ffff8000031b4c4c>] dc_create+0x44c/0x640 [amdgpu] [<ffff800002ea49d8>] amdgpu_dm_init+0x3f8/0x2060 [amdgpu] [<ffff800002ea6658>] dm_hw_init+0x18/0x60 [amdgpu] [<ffff800002b16738>] amdgpu_device_init+0x1938/0x27e0 [amdgpu] [<ffff800002b18e80>] amdgpu_driver_load_kms+0x20/0xa0 [amdgpu] [<ffff800002b0c8f0>] amdgpu_pci_probe+0x1b0/0x580 [amdgpu] [<900000000448eae4>] local_pci_probe+0x44/0xc0 [<9000000003b02b18>] work_for_cpu_fn+0x18/0x40 [<9000000003b05da0>] process_one_work+0x160/0x300 [<9000000003b06718>] worker_thread+0x318/0x440 [<9000000003b11b8c>] kthread+0x12c/0x220 [<9000000003ac1484>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x8/0xa4 Unfortunately, protecting dml2_init()/dml21_init() out of DML2 causes "sleeping function called from invalid context", so protect them with DC_FP_START() and DC_FP_END() inside. Fixes: 7da55c2 ("drm/amd/display: Remove incorrect FP context start") Cc: [email protected] Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Aurabindo Pillai <[email protected]> Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

…ux/kernel/git/kvmarm/kvmarm into HEAD KVM/arm64 fixes for 6.15, round CachyOS#2 - Single fix for broken usage of 'multi-MIDR' infrastructure in PI code, adding an open-coded erratum check for everyone's favorite pile of sand: Cavium ThunderX

Commit 7da55c2 ("drm/amd/display: Remove incorrect FP context start") removes the FP context protection of dml2_create(), and it said "All the DC_FP_START/END should be used before call anything from DML2". However, dml2_init()/dml21_init() are not protected from their callers, causing such errors: do_fpu invoked from kernel context![#1]: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 239 Comm: kworker/0:5 Not tainted 6.14.0-rc6+ #2 Workqueue: events work_for_cpu_fn pc ffff80000319de80 ra ffff80000319de5c tp 900000010575c000 sp 900000010575f840 a0 0000000000000000 a1 900000012f210130 a2 900000012f000000 a3 ffff80000357e268 a4 ffff80000357e260 a5 900000012ea52cf0 a6 0000000400000004 a7 0000012c00001388 t0 00001900000015e0 t1 ffff80000379d000 t2 0000000010624dd3 t3 0000006400000014 t4 00000000000003e8 t5 0000005000000018 t6 0000000000000020 t7 0000000f00000064 t8 000000000000002f u0 5f5e9200f8901912 s9 900000012d380010 s0 900000012ea51fd8 s1 900000012f000000 s2 9000000109296000 s3 0000000000000001 s4 0000000000001fd8 s5 0000000000000001 s6 ffff800003415000 s7 900000012d390000 s8 ffff800003211f80 ra: ffff80000319de5c dml21_apply_soc_bb_overrides+0x3c/0x960 [amdgpu] ERA: ffff80000319de80 dml21_apply_soc_bb_overrides+0x60/0x960 [amdgpu] CRMD: 000000b0 (PLV0 -IE -DA +PG DACF=CC DACM=CC -WE) PRMD: 00000004 (PPLV0 +PIE -PWE) EUEN: 00000000 (-FPE -SXE -ASXE -BTE) ECFG: 00071c1d (LIE=0,2-4,10-12 VS=7) ESTAT: 000f0000 [FPD] (IS= ECode=15 EsubCode=0) PRID: 0014d010 (Loongson-64bit, Loongson-3C6000/S) Process kworker/0:5 (pid: 239, threadinfo=00000000927eadc6, task=000000008fd31682) Stack : 00040dc000003164 0000000000000001 900000012f210130 900000012eabeeb8 900000012f000000 ffff80000319fe48 900000012f210000 900000012f210130 900000012f000000 900000012eabeeb8 0000000000000001 ffff8000031a0064 900000010575f9f0 900000012f210130 900000012eac0000 900000012ea80000 900000012f000000 ffff8000031cefc4 900000010575f9f0 ffff8000035859c0 ffff800003414000 900000010575fa78 900000012f000000 ffff8000031b4c50 0000000000000000 9000000101c9d700 9000000109c40000 5f5e9200f8901912 900000012d3c4bd0 900000012d3c5000 ffff8000034aed18 900000012d380010 900000012d3c4bd0 ffff800003414000 900000012d380000 ffff800002ea49dc 0000000000000001 900000012d3c6000 00000000ffffe423 0000000000010000 ... Call Trace: [<ffff80000319de80>] dml21_apply_soc_bb_overrides+0x60/0x960 [amdgpu] [<ffff80000319fe44>] dml21_init+0xa4/0x280 [amdgpu] [<ffff8000031a0060>] dml21_create+0x40/0x80 [amdgpu] [<ffff8000031cefc0>] dc_state_create+0x100/0x160 [amdgpu] [<ffff8000031b4c4c>] dc_create+0x44c/0x640 [amdgpu] [<ffff800002ea49d8>] amdgpu_dm_init+0x3f8/0x2060 [amdgpu] [<ffff800002ea6658>] dm_hw_init+0x18/0x60 [amdgpu] [<ffff800002b16738>] amdgpu_device_init+0x1938/0x27e0 [amdgpu] [<ffff800002b18e80>] amdgpu_driver_load_kms+0x20/0xa0 [amdgpu] [<ffff800002b0c8f0>] amdgpu_pci_probe+0x1b0/0x580 [amdgpu] [<900000000448eae4>] local_pci_probe+0x44/0xc0 [<9000000003b02b18>] work_for_cpu_fn+0x18/0x40 [<9000000003b05da0>] process_one_work+0x160/0x300 [<9000000003b06718>] worker_thread+0x318/0x440 [<9000000003b11b8c>] kthread+0x12c/0x220 [<9000000003ac1484>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x8/0xa4 Unfortunately, protecting dml2_init()/dml21_init() out of DML2 causes "sleeping function called from invalid context", so protect them with DC_FP_START() and DC_FP_END() inside. Fixes: 7da55c2 ("drm/amd/display: Remove incorrect FP context start") Cc: [email protected] Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Aurabindo Pillai <[email protected]> Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <[email protected]>

[BUG] There is a bug report that a syzbot reproducer can lead to the following busy inode at unmount time: BTRFS info (device loop1): last unmount of filesystem 1680000e-3c1e-4c46-84b6-56bd3909af50 VFS: Busy inodes after unmount of loop1 (btrfs) ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at fs/super.c:650! Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [CachyOS#1] SMP KASAN NOPTI CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 48168 Comm: syz-executor Not tainted 6.15.0-rc2-00471-g119009db2674 CachyOS#2 PREEMPT(full) Hardware name: QEMU Ubuntu 24.04 PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:generic_shutdown_super+0x2e9/0x390 fs/super.c:650 Call Trace: <TASK> kill_anon_super+0x3a/0x60 fs/super.c:1237 btrfs_kill_super+0x3b/0x50 fs/btrfs/super.c:2099 deactivate_locked_super+0xbe/0x1a0 fs/super.c:473 deactivate_super fs/super.c:506 [inline] deactivate_super+0xe2/0x100 fs/super.c:502 cleanup_mnt+0x21f/0x440 fs/namespace.c:1435 task_work_run+0x14d/0x240 kernel/task_work.c:227 resume_user_mode_work include/linux/resume_user_mode.h:50 [inline] exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:114 [inline] exit_to_user_mode_prepare include/linux/entry-common.h:329 [inline] __syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work kernel/entry/common.c:207 [inline] syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x269/0x290 kernel/entry/common.c:218 do_syscall_64+0xd4/0x250 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:100 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f </TASK> [CAUSE] When btrfs_alloc_path() failed, btrfs_iget() directly returned without releasing the inode already allocated by btrfs_iget_locked(). This results the above busy inode and trigger the kernel BUG. [FIX] Fix it by calling iget_failed() if btrfs_alloc_path() failed. If we hit error inside btrfs_read_locked_inode(), it will properly call iget_failed(), so nothing to worry about. Although the iget_failed() cleanup inside btrfs_read_locked_inode() is a break of the normal error handling scheme, let's fix the obvious bug and backport first, then rework the error handling later. Reported-by: Penglei Jiang <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/[email protected]/ Fixes: 7c855e1 ("btrfs: remove conditional path allocation in btrfs_read_locked_inode()") CC: [email protected] # 6.13+ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Penglei Jiang <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>

commit ab680dc upstream. Fix deadlock in job submission and abort handling. When a thread aborts currently executing jobs due to a fault, it first locks the global lock protecting submitted_jobs (#1). After the last job is destroyed, it proceeds to release the related context and locks file_priv (#2). Meanwhile, in the job submission thread, the file_priv lock (#2) is taken first, and then the submitted_jobs lock (#1) is obtained when a job is added to the submitted jobs list. CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- (for example due to a fault) (jobs submissions keep coming) lock(&vdev->submitted_jobs_lock) #1 ivpu_jobs_abort_all() job_destroy() lock(&file_priv->lock) #2 lock(&vdev->submitted_jobs_lock) #1 file_priv_release() lock(&vdev->context_list_lock) lock(&file_priv->lock) #2 This order of locking causes a deadlock. To resolve this issue, change the order of locking in ivpu_job_submit(). Signed-off-by: Karol Wachowski <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Maciej Falkowski <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jacek Lawrynowicz <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jacek Lawrynowicz <[email protected]> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Jacek Lawrynowicz <[email protected]> [ This backport required small adjustments to ivpu_job_submit(), which lacks support for explicit command queue creation added in 6.15. ] Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit 866bafa ] There is a potential deadlock if we do report zones in an IO context, detailed in below lockdep report. When one process do a report zones and another process freezes the block device, the report zones side cannot allocate a tag because the freeze is already started. This can thus result in new block group creation to hang forever, blocking the write path. Thankfully, a new block group should be created on empty zones. So, reporting the zones is not necessary and we can set the write pointer = 0 and load the zone capacity from the block layer using bdev_zone_capacity() helper. ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.14.0-rc1 torvalds#252 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ modprobe/1110 is trying to acquire lock: ffff888100ac83e0 ((work_completion)(&(&wb->dwork)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __flush_work+0x38f/0xb60 but task is already holding lock: ffff8881205b6f20 (&q->q_usage_counter(queue)torvalds#16){++++}-{0:0}, at: sd_remove+0x85/0x130 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #3 (&q->q_usage_counter(queue)torvalds#16){++++}-{0:0}: blk_queue_enter+0x3d9/0x500 blk_mq_alloc_request+0x47d/0x8e0 scsi_execute_cmd+0x14f/0xb80 sd_zbc_do_report_zones+0x1c1/0x470 sd_zbc_report_zones+0x362/0xd60 blkdev_report_zones+0x1b1/0x2e0 btrfs_get_dev_zones+0x215/0x7e0 [btrfs] btrfs_load_block_group_zone_info+0x6d2/0x2c10 [btrfs] btrfs_make_block_group+0x36b/0x870 [btrfs] btrfs_create_chunk+0x147d/0x2320 [btrfs] btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x2ce/0xcf0 [btrfs] start_transaction+0xce6/0x1620 [btrfs] btrfs_uuid_scan_kthread+0x4ee/0x5b0 [btrfs] kthread+0x39d/0x750 ret_from_fork+0x30/0x70 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 -> #2 (&fs_info->dev_replace.rwsem){++++}-{4:4}: down_read+0x9b/0x470 btrfs_map_block+0x2ce/0x2ce0 [btrfs] btrfs_submit_chunk+0x2d4/0x16c0 [btrfs] btrfs_submit_bbio+0x16/0x30 [btrfs] btree_write_cache_pages+0xb5a/0xf90 [btrfs] do_writepages+0x17f/0x7b0 __writeback_single_inode+0x114/0xb00 writeback_sb_inodes+0x52b/0xe00 wb_writeback+0x1a7/0x800 wb_workfn+0x12a/0xbd0 process_one_work+0x85a/0x1460 worker_thread+0x5e2/0xfc0 kthread+0x39d/0x750 ret_from_fork+0x30/0x70 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 -> #1 (&fs_info->zoned_meta_io_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}: __mutex_lock+0x1aa/0x1360 btree_write_cache_pages+0x252/0xf90 [btrfs] do_writepages+0x17f/0x7b0 __writeback_single_inode+0x114/0xb00 writeback_sb_inodes+0x52b/0xe00 wb_writeback+0x1a7/0x800 wb_workfn+0x12a/0xbd0 process_one_work+0x85a/0x1460 worker_thread+0x5e2/0xfc0 kthread+0x39d/0x750 ret_from_fork+0x30/0x70 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 -> #0 ((work_completion)(&(&wb->dwork)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x2f52/0x5ea0 lock_acquire+0x1b1/0x540 __flush_work+0x3ac/0xb60 wb_shutdown+0x15b/0x1f0 bdi_unregister+0x172/0x5b0 del_gendisk+0x841/0xa20 sd_remove+0x85/0x130 device_release_driver_internal+0x368/0x520 bus_remove_device+0x1f1/0x3f0 device_del+0x3bd/0x9c0 __scsi_remove_device+0x272/0x340 scsi_forget_host+0xf7/0x170 scsi_remove_host+0xd2/0x2a0 sdebug_driver_remove+0x52/0x2f0 [scsi_debug] device_release_driver_internal+0x368/0x520 bus_remove_device+0x1f1/0x3f0 device_del+0x3bd/0x9c0 device_unregister+0x13/0xa0 sdebug_do_remove_host+0x1fb/0x290 [scsi_debug] scsi_debug_exit+0x17/0x70 [scsi_debug] __do_sys_delete_module.isra.0+0x321/0x520 do_syscall_64+0x93/0x180 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: (work_completion)(&(&wb->dwork)->work) --> &fs_info->dev_replace.rwsem --> &q->q_usage_counter(queue)torvalds#16 Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&q->q_usage_counter(queue)torvalds#16); lock(&fs_info->dev_replace.rwsem); lock(&q->q_usage_counter(queue)torvalds#16); lock((work_completion)(&(&wb->dwork)->work)); *** DEADLOCK *** 5 locks held by modprobe/1110: #0: ffff88811f7bc108 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: device_release_driver_internal+0x8f/0x520 #1: ffff8881022ee0e0 (&shost->scan_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: scsi_remove_host+0x20/0x2a0 #2: ffff88811b4c4378 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: device_release_driver_internal+0x8f/0x520 #3: ffff8881205b6f20 (&q->q_usage_counter(queue)torvalds#16){++++}-{0:0}, at: sd_remove+0x85/0x130 #4: ffffffffa3284360 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: __flush_work+0xda/0xb60 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 1110 Comm: modprobe Not tainted 6.14.0-rc1 torvalds#252 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-3.fc41 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x6a/0x90 print_circular_bug.cold+0x1e0/0x274 check_noncircular+0x306/0x3f0 ? __pfx_check_noncircular+0x10/0x10 ? mark_lock+0xf5/0x1650 ? __pfx_check_irq_usage+0x10/0x10 ? lockdep_lock+0xca/0x1c0 ? __pfx_lockdep_lock+0x10/0x10 __lock_acquire+0x2f52/0x5ea0 ? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_mark_lock+0x10/0x10 lock_acquire+0x1b1/0x540 ? __flush_work+0x38f/0xb60 ? __pfx_lock_acquire+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_lock_release+0x10/0x10 ? mark_held_locks+0x94/0xe0 ? __flush_work+0x38f/0xb60 __flush_work+0x3ac/0xb60 ? __flush_work+0x38f/0xb60 ? __pfx_mark_lock+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx___flush_work+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_wq_barrier_func+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx___might_resched+0x10/0x10 ? mark_held_locks+0x94/0xe0 wb_shutdown+0x15b/0x1f0 bdi_unregister+0x172/0x5b0 ? __pfx_bdi_unregister+0x10/0x10 ? up_write+0x1ba/0x510 del_gendisk+0x841/0xa20 ? __pfx_del_gendisk+0x10/0x10 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x35/0x60 ? __pm_runtime_resume+0x79/0x110 sd_remove+0x85/0x130 device_release_driver_internal+0x368/0x520 ? kobject_put+0x5d/0x4a0 bus_remove_device+0x1f1/0x3f0 device_del+0x3bd/0x9c0 ? __pfx_device_del+0x10/0x10 __scsi_remove_device+0x272/0x340 scsi_forget_host+0xf7/0x170 scsi_remove_host+0xd2/0x2a0 sdebug_driver_remove+0x52/0x2f0 [scsi_debug] ? kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0xc0/0xf0 device_release_driver_internal+0x368/0x520 ? kobject_put+0x5d/0x4a0 bus_remove_device+0x1f1/0x3f0 device_del+0x3bd/0x9c0 ? __pfx_device_del+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx___mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x10/0x10 device_unregister+0x13/0xa0 sdebug_do_remove_host+0x1fb/0x290 [scsi_debug] scsi_debug_exit+0x17/0x70 [scsi_debug] __do_sys_delete_module.isra.0+0x321/0x520 ? __pfx___do_sys_delete_module.isra.0+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_slab_free_after_rcu_debug+0x10/0x10 ? kasan_save_stack+0x2c/0x50 ? kasan_record_aux_stack+0xa3/0xb0 ? __call_rcu_common.constprop.0+0xc4/0xfb0 ? kmem_cache_free+0x3a0/0x590 ? __x64_sys_close+0x78/0xd0 do_syscall_64+0x93/0x180 ? lock_is_held_type+0xd5/0x130 ? __call_rcu_common.constprop.0+0x3c0/0xfb0 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x78/0x100 ? __call_rcu_common.constprop.0+0x3c0/0xfb0 ? __pfx___call_rcu_common.constprop.0+0x10/0x10 ? kmem_cache_free+0x3a0/0x590 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x16d/0x400 ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x78/0x100 ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180 ? __pfx___x64_sys_openat+0x10/0x10 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x16d/0x400 ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x78/0x100 ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e RIP: 0033:0x7f436712b68b RSP: 002b:00007ffe9f1a8658 EFLAGS: 00000206 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000b0 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00005559b367fd80 RCX: 00007f436712b68b RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000800 RDI: 00005559b367fde8 RBP: 00007ffe9f1a8680 R08: 1999999999999999 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 00007f43671a5fe0 R11: 0000000000000206 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 00007ffe9f1a86b0 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 </TASK> Reported-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <[email protected]> CC: <[email protected]> # 6.13+ Tested-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit 48c1d1b ] [BUG] There is a bug report that a syzbot reproducer can lead to the following busy inode at unmount time: BTRFS info (device loop1): last unmount of filesystem 1680000e-3c1e-4c46-84b6-56bd3909af50 VFS: Busy inodes after unmount of loop1 (btrfs) ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at fs/super.c:650! Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN NOPTI CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 48168 Comm: syz-executor Not tainted 6.15.0-rc2-00471-g119009db2674 #2 PREEMPT(full) Hardware name: QEMU Ubuntu 24.04 PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:generic_shutdown_super+0x2e9/0x390 fs/super.c:650 Call Trace: <TASK> kill_anon_super+0x3a/0x60 fs/super.c:1237 btrfs_kill_super+0x3b/0x50 fs/btrfs/super.c:2099 deactivate_locked_super+0xbe/0x1a0 fs/super.c:473 deactivate_super fs/super.c:506 [inline] deactivate_super+0xe2/0x100 fs/super.c:502 cleanup_mnt+0x21f/0x440 fs/namespace.c:1435 task_work_run+0x14d/0x240 kernel/task_work.c:227 resume_user_mode_work include/linux/resume_user_mode.h:50 [inline] exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:114 [inline] exit_to_user_mode_prepare include/linux/entry-common.h:329 [inline] __syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work kernel/entry/common.c:207 [inline] syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x269/0x290 kernel/entry/common.c:218 do_syscall_64+0xd4/0x250 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:100 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f </TASK> [CAUSE] When btrfs_alloc_path() failed, btrfs_iget() directly returned without releasing the inode already allocated by btrfs_iget_locked(). This results the above busy inode and trigger the kernel BUG. [FIX] Fix it by calling iget_failed() if btrfs_alloc_path() failed. If we hit error inside btrfs_read_locked_inode(), it will properly call iget_failed(), so nothing to worry about. Although the iget_failed() cleanup inside btrfs_read_locked_inode() is a break of the normal error handling scheme, let's fix the obvious bug and backport first, then rework the error handling later. Reported-by: Penglei Jiang <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/[email protected]/ Fixes: 7c855e1 ("btrfs: remove conditional path allocation in btrfs_read_locked_inode()") CC: [email protected] # 6.13+ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Penglei Jiang <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

…unload Kernel panic occurs when a devmem TCP socket is closed after NIC module is unloaded. This is Devmem TCP unregistration scenarios. number is an order. (a)netlink socket close (b)pp destroy (c)uninstall result 1 2 3 OK 1 3 2 (d)Impossible 2 1 3 OK 3 1 2 (e)Kernel panic 2 3 1 (d)Impossible 3 2 1 (d)Impossible (a) netdev_nl_sock_priv_destroy() is called when devmem TCP socket is closed. (b) page_pool_destroy() is called when the interface is down. (c) mp_ops->uninstall() is called when an interface is unregistered. (d) There is no scenario in mp_ops->uninstall() is called before page_pool_destroy(). Because unregister_netdevice_many_notify() closes interfaces first and then calls mp_ops->uninstall(). (e) netdev_nl_sock_priv_destroy() accesses struct net_device to acquire netdev_lock(). But if the interface module has already been removed, net_device pointer is invalid, so it causes kernel panic. In summary, there are only 3 possible scenarios. A. sk close -> pp destroy -> uninstall. B. pp destroy -> sk close -> uninstall. C. pp destroy -> uninstall -> sk close. Case C is a kernel panic scenario. In order to fix this problem, It makes mp_dmabuf_devmem_uninstall() set binding->dev to NULL. It indicates an bound net_device was unregistered. It makes netdev_nl_sock_priv_destroy() do not acquire netdev_lock() if binding->dev is NULL. A new binding->lock is added to protect a dev of a binding. So, lock ordering is like below. priv->lock netdev_lock(dev) binding->lock Tests: Scenario A: ./ncdevmem -s 192.168.1.4 -c 192.168.1.2 -f $interface -l -p 8000 \ -v 7 -t 1 -q 1 & pid=$! sleep 10 kill $pid ip link set $interface down modprobe -rv $module Scenario B: ./ncdevmem -s 192.168.1.4 -c 192.168.1.2 -f $interface -l -p 8000 \ -v 7 -t 1 -q 1 & pid=$! sleep 10 ip link set $interface down kill $pid modprobe -rv $module Scenario C: ./ncdevmem -s 192.168.1.4 -c 192.168.1.2 -f $interface -l -p 8000 \ -v 7 -t 1 -q 1 & pid=$! sleep 10 modprobe -rv $module sleep 5 kill $pid Splat looks like: Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc001fffa9f7: 0000 [CachyOS#1] SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC KASAN NOPTI KASAN: probably user-memory-access in range [0x00000000fffd4fb8-0x00000000fffd4fbf] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 2041 Comm: ncdevmem Tainted: G B W 6.15.0-rc1+ CachyOS#2 PREEMPT(undef) 0947ec89efa0fd68838b78e36aa1617e97ff5d7f Tainted: [B]=BAD_PAGE, [W]=WARN RIP: 0010:__mutex_lock (./include/linux/sched.h:2244 kernel/locking/mutex.c:400 kernel/locking/mutex.c:443 kernel/locking/mutex.c:605 kernel/locking/mutex.c:746) Code: ea 03 80 3c 02 00 0f 85 4f 13 00 00 49 8b 1e 48 83 e3 f8 74 6a 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 48 8d 7b 34 48 89 fa 48 c1 ea 03 <0f> b6 f RSP: 0018:ffff88826f7ef730 EFLAGS: 00010203 RAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: 00000000fffd4f88 RCX: ffffffffaa9bc811 RDX: 000000001fffa9f7 RSI: 0000000000000008 RDI: 00000000fffd4fbc RBP: ffff88826f7ef8b0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffed103e6aa1a4 R10: 0000000000000007 R11: ffff88826f7ef442 R12: fffffbfff669f65e R13: ffff88812a830040 R14: ffff8881f3550d20 R15: 00000000fffd4f88 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff888866c05000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000563bed0cb288 CR3: 00000001a7c98000 CR4: 00000000007506f0 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <TASK> ... netdev_nl_sock_priv_destroy (net/core/netdev-genl.c:953 (discriminator 3)) genl_release (net/netlink/genetlink.c:653 net/netlink/genetlink.c:694 net/netlink/genetlink.c:705) ... netlink_release (net/netlink/af_netlink.c:737) ... __sock_release (net/socket.c:647) sock_close (net/socket.c:1393) Fixes: 1d22d30 ("net: drop rtnl_lock for queue_mgmt operations") Signed-off-by: Taehee Yoo <[email protected]> Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <[email protected]> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>

ACPICA commit 1c28da2242783579d59767617121035dafba18c3 This was originally done in NetBSD: NetBSD/src@b69d1ac and is the correct alternative to the smattering of `memcpy`s I previously contributed to this repository. This also sidesteps the newly strict checks added in UBSAN: llvm/llvm-project@7926744 Before this change we see the following UBSAN stack trace in Fuchsia: #0 0x000021afcfdeca5e in acpi_rs_get_address_common(struct acpi_resource*, union aml_resource*) ../../third_party/acpica/source/components/resources/rsaddr.c:329 <platform-bus-x86.so>+0x6aca5e CachyOS#1.2 0x000021982bc4af3c in ubsan_get_stack_trace() compiler-rt/lib/ubsan/ubsan_diag.cpp:41 <libclang_rt.asan.so>+0x41f3c CachyOS#1.1 0x000021982bc4af3c in maybe_print_stack_trace() compiler-rt/lib/ubsan/ubsan_diag.cpp:51 <libclang_rt.asan.so>+0x41f3c CachyOS#1 0x000021982bc4af3c in ~scoped_report() compiler-rt/lib/ubsan/ubsan_diag.cpp:395 <libclang_rt.asan.so>+0x41f3c CachyOS#2 0x000021982bc4bb6f in handletype_mismatch_impl() compiler-rt/lib/ubsan/ubsan_handlers.cpp:137 <libclang_rt.asan.so>+0x42b6f CachyOS#3 0x000021982bc4b723 in __ubsan_handle_type_mismatch_v1 compiler-rt/lib/ubsan/ubsan_handlers.cpp:142 <libclang_rt.asan.so>+0x42723 CachyOS#4 0x000021afcfdeca5e in acpi_rs_get_address_common(struct acpi_resource*, union aml_resource*) ../../third_party/acpica/source/components/resources/rsaddr.c:329 <platform-bus-x86.so>+0x6aca5e CachyOS#5 0x000021afcfdf2089 in acpi_rs_convert_aml_to_resource(struct acpi_resource*, union aml_resource*, struct acpi_rsconvert_info*) ../../third_party/acpica/source/components/resources/rsmisc.c:355 <platform-bus-x86.so>+0x6b2089 torvalds#6 0x000021afcfded169 in acpi_rs_convert_aml_to_resources(u8*, u32, u32, u8, void**) ../../third_party/acpica/source/components/resources/rslist.c:137 <platform-bus-x86.so>+0x6ad169 torvalds#7 0x000021afcfe2d24a in acpi_ut_walk_aml_resources(struct acpi_walk_state*, u8*, acpi_size, acpi_walk_aml_callback, void**) ../../third_party/acpica/source/components/utilities/utresrc.c:237 <platform-bus-x86.so>+0x6ed24a torvalds#8 0x000021afcfde66b7 in acpi_rs_create_resource_list(union acpi_operand_object*, struct acpi_buffer*) ../../third_party/acpica/source/components/resources/rscreate.c:199 <platform-bus-x86.so>+0x6a66b7 torvalds#9 0x000021afcfdf6979 in acpi_rs_get_method_data(acpi_handle, const char*, struct acpi_buffer*) ../../third_party/acpica/source/components/resources/rsutils.c:770 <platform-bus-x86.so>+0x6b6979 torvalds#10 0x000021afcfdf708f in acpi_walk_resources(acpi_handle, char*, acpi_walk_resource_callback, void*) ../../third_party/acpica/source/components/resources/rsxface.c:731 <platform-bus-x86.so>+0x6b708f torvalds#11 0x000021afcfa95dcf in acpi::acpi_impl::walk_resources(acpi::acpi_impl*, acpi_handle, const char*, acpi::Acpi::resources_callable) ../../src/devices/board/lib/acpi/acpi-impl.cc:41 <platform-bus-x86.so>+0x355dcf torvalds#12 0x000021afcfaa8278 in acpi::device_builder::gather_resources(acpi::device_builder*, acpi::Acpi*, fidl::any_arena&, acpi::Manager*, acpi::device_builder::gather_resources_callback) ../../src/devices/board/lib/acpi/device-builder.cc:84 <platform-bus-x86.so>+0x368278 torvalds#13 0x000021afcfbddb87 in acpi::Manager::configure_discovered_devices(acpi::Manager*) ../../src/devices/board/lib/acpi/manager.cc:75 <platform-bus-x86.so>+0x49db87 torvalds#14 0x000021afcf99091d in publish_acpi_devices(acpi::Manager*, zx_device_t*, zx_device_t*) ../../src/devices/board/drivers/x86/acpi-nswalk.cc:95 <platform-bus-x86.so>+0x25091d torvalds#15 0x000021afcf9c1d4e in x86::X86::do_init(x86::X86*) ../../src/devices/board/drivers/x86/x86.cc:60 <platform-bus-x86.so>+0x281d4e torvalds#16 0x000021afcf9e33ad in λ(x86::X86::ddk_init::(anon class)*) ../../src/devices/board/drivers/x86/x86.cc:77 <platform-bus-x86.so>+0x2a33ad torvalds#17 0x000021afcf9e313e in fit::internal::target<(lambda at../../src/devices/board/drivers/x86/x86.cc:76:19), false, false, std::__2::allocator<std::byte>, void>::invoke(void*) ../../sdk/lib/fit/include/lib/fit/internal/function.h:183 <platform-bus-x86.so>+0x2a313e torvalds#18 0x000021afcfbab4c7 in fit::internal::function_base<16UL, false, void(), std::__2::allocator<std::byte>>::invoke(const fit::internal::function_base<16UL, false, void (), std::__2::allocator<std::byte> >*) ../../sdk/lib/fit/include/lib/fit/internal/function.h:522 <platform-bus-x86.so>+0x46b4c7 torvalds#19 0x000021afcfbab342 in fit::function_impl<16UL, false, void(), std::__2::allocator<std::byte>>::operator()(const fit::function_impl<16UL, false, void (), std::__2::allocator<std::byte> >*) ../../sdk/lib/fit/include/lib/fit/function.h:315 <platform-bus-x86.so>+0x46b342 torvalds#20 0x000021afcfcd98c3 in async::internal::retained_task::Handler(async_dispatcher_t*, async_task_t*, zx_status_t) ../../sdk/lib/async/task.cc:24 <platform-bus-x86.so>+0x5998c3 torvalds#21 0x00002290f9924616 in λ(const driver_runtime::Dispatcher::post_task::(anon class)*, std::__2::unique_ptr<driver_runtime::callback_request, std::__2::default_delete<driver_runtime::callback_request> >, zx_status_t) ../../src/devices/bin/driver_runtime/dispatcher.cc:789 <libdriver_runtime.so>+0x10a616 torvalds#22 0x00002290f9924323 in fit::internal::target<(lambda at../../src/devices/bin/driver_runtime/dispatcher.cc:788:7), true, false, std::__2::allocator<std::byte>, void, std::__2::unique_ptr<driver_runtime::callback_request, std::__2::default_delete<driver_runtime::callback_request>>, int>::invoke(void*, std::__2::unique_ptr<driver_runtime::callback_request, std::__2::default_delete<driver_runtime::callback_request> >, int) ../../sdk/lib/fit/include/lib/fit/internal/function.h:128 <libdriver_runtime.so>+0x10a323 torvalds#23 0x00002290f9904b76 in fit::internal::function_base<24UL, true, void(std::__2::unique_ptr<driver_runtime::callback_request, std::__2::default_delete<driver_runtime::callback_request>>, int), std::__2::allocator<std::byte>>::invoke(const fit::internal::function_base<24UL, true, void (std::__2::unique_ptr<driver_runtime::callback_request, std::__2::default_delete<driver_runtime::callback_request> >, int), std::__2::allocator<std::byte> >*, std::__2::unique_ptr<driver_runtime::callback_request, std::__2::default_delete<driver_runtime::callback_request> >, int) ../../sdk/lib/fit/include/lib/fit/internal/function.h:522 <libdriver_runtime.so>+0xeab76 torvalds#24 0x00002290f9904831 in fit::callback_impl<24UL, true, void(std::__2::unique_ptr<driver_runtime::callback_request, std::__2::default_delete<driver_runtime::callback_request>>, int), std::__2::allocator<std::byte>>::operator()(fit::callback_impl<24UL, true, void (std::__2::unique_ptr<driver_runtime::callback_request, std::__2::default_delete<driver_runtime::callback_request> >, int), std::__2::allocator<std::byte> >*, std::__2::unique_ptr<driver_runtime::callback_request, std::__2::default_delete<driver_runtime::callback_request> >, int) ../../sdk/lib/fit/include/lib/fit/function.h:471 <libdriver_runtime.so>+0xea831 torvalds#25 0x00002290f98d5adc in driver_runtime::callback_request::Call(driver_runtime::callback_request*, std::__2::unique_ptr<driver_runtime::callback_request, std::__2::default_delete<driver_runtime::callback_request> >, zx_status_t) ../../src/devices/bin/driver_runtime/callback_request.h:74 <libdriver_runtime.so>+0xbbadc torvalds#26 0x00002290f98e1e58 in driver_runtime::Dispatcher::dispatch_callback(driver_runtime::Dispatcher*, std::__2::unique_ptr<driver_runtime::callback_request, std::__2::default_delete<driver_runtime::callback_request> >) ../../src/devices/bin/driver_runtime/dispatcher.cc:1248 <libdriver_runtime.so>+0xc7e58 torvalds#27 0x00002290f98e4159 in driver_runtime::Dispatcher::dispatch_callbacks(driver_runtime::Dispatcher*, std::__2::unique_ptr<driver_runtime::Dispatcher::event_waiter, std::__2::default_delete<driver_runtime::Dispatcher::event_waiter> >, fbl::ref_ptr<driver_runtime::Dispatcher>) ../../src/devices/bin/driver_runtime/dispatcher.cc:1308 <libdriver_runtime.so>+0xca159 torvalds#28 0x00002290f9918414 in λ(const driver_runtime::Dispatcher::create_with_adder::(anon class)*, std::__2::unique_ptr<driver_runtime::Dispatcher::event_waiter, std::__2::default_delete<driver_runtime::Dispatcher::event_waiter> >, fbl::ref_ptr<driver_runtime::Dispatcher>) ../../src/devices/bin/driver_runtime/dispatcher.cc:353 <libdriver_runtime.so>+0xfe414 torvalds#29 0x00002290f991812d in fit::internal::target<(lambda at../../src/devices/bin/driver_runtime/dispatcher.cc:351:7), true, false, std::__2::allocator<std::byte>, void, std::__2::unique_ptr<driver_runtime::Dispatcher::event_waiter, std::__2::default_delete<driver_runtime::Dispatcher::event_waiter>>, fbl::ref_ptr<driver_runtime::Dispatcher>>::invoke(void*, std::__2::unique_ptr<driver_runtime::Dispatcher::event_waiter, std::__2::default_delete<driver_runtime::Dispatcher::event_waiter> >, fbl::ref_ptr<driver_runtime::Dispatcher>) ../../sdk/lib/fit/include/lib/fit/internal/function.h:128 <libdriver_runtime.so>+0xfe12d torvalds#30 0x00002290f9906fc7 in fit::internal::function_base<8UL, true, void(std::__2::unique_ptr<driver_runtime::Dispatcher::event_waiter, std::__2::default_delete<driver_runtime::Dispatcher::event_waiter>>, fbl::ref_ptr<driver_runtime::Dispatcher>), std::__2::allocator<std::byte>>::invoke(const fit::internal::function_base<8UL, true, void (std::__2::unique_ptr<driver_runtime::Dispatcher::event_waiter, std::__2::default_delete<driver_runtime::Dispatcher::event_waiter> >, fbl::ref_ptr<driver_runtime::Dispatcher>), std::__2::allocator<std::byte> >*, std::__2::unique_ptr<driver_runtime::Dispatcher::event_waiter, std::__2::default_delete<driver_runtime::Dispatcher::event_waiter> >, fbl::ref_ptr<driver_runtime::Dispatcher>) ../../sdk/lib/fit/include/lib/fit/internal/function.h:522 <libdriver_runtime.so>+0xecfc7 torvalds#31 0x00002290f9906c66 in fit::function_impl<8UL, true, void(std::__2::unique_ptr<driver_runtime::Dispatcher::event_waiter, std::__2::default_delete<driver_runtime::Dispatcher::event_waiter>>, fbl::ref_ptr<driver_runtime::Dispatcher>), std::__2::allocator<std::byte>>::operator()(const fit::function_impl<8UL, true, void (std::__2::unique_ptr<driver_runtime::Dispatcher::event_waiter, std::__2::default_delete<driver_runtime::Dispatcher::event_waiter> >, fbl::ref_ptr<driver_runtime::Dispatcher>), std::__2::allocator<std::byte> >*, std::__2::unique_ptr<driver_runtime::Dispatcher::event_waiter, std::__2::default_delete<driver_runtime::Dispatcher::event_waiter> >, fbl::ref_ptr<driver_runtime::Dispatcher>) ../../sdk/lib/fit/include/lib/fit/function.h:315 <libdriver_runtime.so>+0xecc66 torvalds#32 0x00002290f98e73d9 in driver_runtime::Dispatcher::event_waiter::invoke_callback(driver_runtime::Dispatcher::event_waiter*, std::__2::unique_ptr<driver_runtime::Dispatcher::event_waiter, std::__2::default_delete<driver_runtime::Dispatcher::event_waiter> >, fbl::ref_ptr<driver_runtime::Dispatcher>) ../../src/devices/bin/driver_runtime/dispatcher.h:543 <libdriver_runtime.so>+0xcd3d9 torvalds#33 0x00002290f98e700d in driver_runtime::Dispatcher::event_waiter::handle_event(std::__2::unique_ptr<driver_runtime::Dispatcher::event_waiter, std::__2::default_delete<driver_runtime::Dispatcher::event_waiter> >, async_dispatcher_t*, async::wait_base*, zx_status_t, zx_packet_signal_t const*) ../../src/devices/bin/driver_runtime/dispatcher.cc:1442 <libdriver_runtime.so>+0xcd00d torvalds#34 0x00002290f9918983 in async_loop_owned_event_handler<driver_runtime::Dispatcher::event_waiter>::handle_event(async_loop_owned_event_handler<driver_runtime::Dispatcher::event_waiter>*, async_dispatcher_t*, async::wait_base*, zx_status_t, zx_packet_signal_t const*) ../../src/devices/bin/driver_runtime/async_loop_owned_event_handler.h:59 <libdriver_runtime.so>+0xfe983 torvalds#35 0x00002290f9918b9e in async::wait_method<async_loop_owned_event_handler<driver_runtime::Dispatcher::event_waiter>, &async_loop_owned_event_handler<driver_runtime::Dispatcher::event_waiter>::handle_event>::call_handler(async_dispatcher_t*, async_wait_t*, zx_status_t, zx_packet_signal_t const*) ../../sdk/lib/async/include/lib/async/cpp/wait.h:201 <libdriver_runtime.so>+0xfeb9e torvalds#36 0x00002290f99bf509 in async_loop_dispatch_wait(async_loop_t*, async_wait_t*, zx_status_t, zx_packet_signal_t const*) ../../sdk/lib/async-loop/loop.c:394 <libdriver_runtime.so>+0x1a5509 torvalds#37 0x00002290f99b9958 in async_loop_run_once(async_loop_t*, zx_time_t) ../../sdk/lib/async-loop/loop.c:343 <libdriver_runtime.so>+0x19f958 torvalds#38 0x00002290f99b9247 in async_loop_run(async_loop_t*, zx_time_t, _Bool) ../../sdk/lib/async-loop/loop.c:301 <libdriver_runtime.so>+0x19f247 torvalds#39 0x00002290f99ba962 in async_loop_run_thread(void*) ../../sdk/lib/async-loop/loop.c:860 <libdriver_runtime.so>+0x1a0962 torvalds#40 0x000041afd176ef30 in start_c11(void*) ../../zircon/third_party/ulib/musl/pthread/pthread_create.c:63 <libc.so>+0x84f30 torvalds#41 0x000041afd18a448d in thread_trampoline(uintptr_t, uintptr_t) ../../zircon/system/ulib/runtime/thread.cc:100 <libc.so>+0x1ba48d Link: acpica/acpica@1c28da22 Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <[email protected]> [ rjw: Pick up the tag from Tamir ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>

Lockdep reports a possible circular locking dependency [1] when cpu_hotplug_lock is acquired inside store_local_boost(), after policy->rwsem has already been taken by store(). However, the boost update is strictly per-policy and does not access shared state or iterate over all policies. Since policy->rwsem is already held, this is enough to serialize against concurrent topology changes for the current policy. Remove the cpus_read_lock() to resolve the lockdep warning and avoid unnecessary locking. [1] ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.15.0-rc6-debug-gb01fc4eca73c CachyOS#1 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ power-profiles-/588 is trying to acquire lock: ffffffffb3a7d910 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: store_local_boost+0x56/0xd0 but task is already holding lock: ffff8b6e5a12c380 (&policy->rwsem){++++}-{4:4}, at: store+0x37/0x90 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> CachyOS#2 (&policy->rwsem){++++}-{4:4}: down_write+0x29/0xb0 cpufreq_online+0x7e8/0xa40 cpufreq_add_dev+0x82/0xa0 subsys_interface_register+0x148/0x160 cpufreq_register_driver+0x15d/0x260 amd_pstate_register_driver+0x36/0x90 amd_pstate_init+0x1e7/0x270 do_one_initcall+0x68/0x2b0 kernel_init_freeable+0x231/0x270 kernel_init+0x15/0x130 ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x50 ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 -> CachyOS#1 (subsys mutex#3){+.+.}-{4:4}: __mutex_lock+0xc2/0x930 subsys_interface_register+0x7f/0x160 cpufreq_register_driver+0x15d/0x260 amd_pstate_register_driver+0x36/0x90 amd_pstate_init+0x1e7/0x270 do_one_initcall+0x68/0x2b0 kernel_init_freeable+0x231/0x270 kernel_init+0x15/0x130 ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x50 ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 -> #0 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x10ed/0x1850 lock_acquire.part.0+0x69/0x1b0 cpus_read_lock+0x2a/0xc0 store_local_boost+0x56/0xd0 store+0x50/0x90 kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x132/0x200 vfs_write+0x2b3/0x590 ksys_write+0x74/0xf0 do_syscall_64+0xbb/0x1d0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x56/0x5e Signed-off-by: Seyediman Seyedarab <[email protected]> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>

Intel TDX protects guest VM's from malicious host and certain physical attacks. TDX introduces a new operation mode, Secure Arbitration Mode (SEAM) to isolate and protect guest VM's. A TDX guest VM runs in SEAM and, unlike VMX, direct control and interaction with the guest by the host VMM is not possible. Instead, Intel TDX Module, which also runs in SEAM, provides a SEAMCALL API. The SEAMCALL that provides the ability to enter a guest is TDH.VP.ENTER. The TDX Module processes TDH.VP.ENTER, and enters the guest via VMX VMLAUNCH/VMRESUME instructions. When a guest VM-exit requires host VMM interaction, the TDH.VP.ENTER SEAMCALL returns to the host VMM (KVM). Add tdh_vp_enter() to wrap the SEAMCALL invocation of TDH.VP.ENTER; tdh_vp_enter() needs to be noinstr because VM entry in KVM is noinstr as well, which is for two reasons: * marking the area as CT_STATE_GUEST via guest_state_enter_irqoff() and guest_state_exit_irqoff() * IRET must be avoided between VM-exit and NMI handling, in order to avoid prematurely releasing the NMI inhibit. TDH.VP.ENTER is different from other SEAMCALLs in several ways: it uses more arguments, and after it returns some host state may need to be restored. Therefore tdh_vp_enter() uses __seamcall_saved_ret() instead of __seamcall_ret(); since it is the only caller of __seamcall_saved_ret(), it can be made noinstr also. TDH.VP.ENTER arguments are passed through General Purpose Registers (GPRs). For the special case of the TD guest invoking TDG.VP.VMCALL, nearly any GPR can be used, as well as XMM0 to XMM15. Notably, RBP is not used, and Linux mandates the TDX Module feature NO_RBP_MOD, which is enforced elsewhere. Additionally, XMM registers are not required for the existing Guest Hypervisor Communication Interface and are handled by existing KVM code should they be modified by the guest. There are 2 input formats and 5 output formats for TDH.VP.ENTER arguments. Input CachyOS#1 : Initial entry or following a previous async. TD Exit Input CachyOS#2 : Following a previous TDCALL(TDG.VP.VMCALL) Output CachyOS#1 : On Error (No TD Entry) Output CachyOS#2 : Async. Exits with a VMX Architectural Exit Reason Output CachyOS#3 : Async. Exits with a non-VMX TD Exit Status Output CachyOS#4 : Async. Exits with Cross-TD Exit Details Output CachyOS#5 : On TDCALL(TDG.VP.VMCALL) Currently, to keep things simple, the wrapper function does not attempt to support different formats, and just passes all the GPRs that could be used. The GPR values are held by KVM in the area set aside for guest GPRs. KVM code uses the guest GPR area (vcpu->arch.regs[]) to set up for or process results of tdh_vp_enter(). Therefore changing tdh_vp_enter() to use more complex argument formats would also alter the way KVM code interacts with tdh_vp_enter(). Signed-off-by: Kai Huang <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <[email protected]> Message-ID: <[email protected]> Acked-by: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <[email protected]>

…mage WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 9426 at fs/inode.c:417 drop_nlink+0xac/0xd0 home/cc/linux/fs/inode.c:417 Modules linked in: CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 9426 Comm: syz-executor568 Not tainted 6.14.0-12627-g94d471a4f428 CachyOS#2 PREEMPT(full) Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:drop_nlink+0xac/0xd0 home/cc/linux/fs/inode.c:417 Code: 48 8b 5d 28 be 08 00 00 00 48 8d bb 70 07 00 00 e8 f9 67 e6 ff f0 48 ff 83 70 07 00 00 5b 5d e9 9a 12 82 ff e8 95 12 82 ff 90 <0f> 0b 90 c7 45 48 ff ff ff ff 5b 5d e9 83 12 82 ff e8 fe 5f e6 ff RSP: 0018:ffffc900026b7c28 EFLAGS: 00010293 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffffffff8239710f RDX: ffff888041345a00 RSI: ffffffff8239717b RDI: 0000000000000005 RBP: ffff888054509ad0 R08: 0000000000000005 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: ffffffff9ab36f08 R12: ffff88804bb40000 R13: ffff8880545091e0 R14: 0000000000008000 R15: ffff8880545091e0 FS: 000055555d0c5880(0000) GS:ffff8880eb3e3000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f915c55b178 CR3: 0000000050d20000 CR4: 0000000000352ef0 Call Trace: <task> f2fs_i_links_write home/cc/linux/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h:3194 [inline] f2fs_drop_nlink+0xd1/0x3c0 home/cc/linux/fs/f2fs/dir.c:845 f2fs_delete_entry+0x542/0x1450 home/cc/linux/fs/f2fs/dir.c:909 f2fs_unlink+0x45c/0x890 home/cc/linux/fs/f2fs/namei.c:581 vfs_unlink+0x2fb/0x9b0 home/cc/linux/fs/namei.c:4544 do_unlinkat+0x4c5/0x6a0 home/cc/linux/fs/namei.c:4608 __do_sys_unlink home/cc/linux/fs/namei.c:4654 [inline] __se_sys_unlink home/cc/linux/fs/namei.c:4652 [inline] __x64_sys_unlink+0xc5/0x110 home/cc/linux/fs/namei.c:4652 do_syscall_x64 home/cc/linux/arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xc7/0x250 home/cc/linux/arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7fb3d092324b Code: 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 c0 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 83 c8 ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 90 f3 0f 1e fa b8 57 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 c0 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007ffdc232d938 EFLAGS: 00000206 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000057 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007fb3d092324b RDX: 00007ffdc232d960 RSI: 00007ffdc232d960 RDI: 00007ffdc232d9f0 RBP: 00007ffdc232d9f0 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 00007ffdc232d7c0 R10: 00000000fffffffd R11: 0000000000000206 R12: 00007ffdc232eaf0 R13: 000055555d0cebb0 R14: 00007ffdc232d958 R15: 0000000000000001 </task> Cc: [email protected] Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <[email protected]>

Running a modified trace-cmd record --nosplice where it does a mmap of the ring buffer when '--nosplice' is set, caused the following lockdep splat: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.15.0-rc7-test-00002-gfb7d03d8a82f torvalds#551 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ trace-cmd/1113 is trying to acquire lock: ffff888100062888 (&buffer->mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: ring_buffer_map+0x11c/0xe70 but task is already holding lock: ffff888100a5f9f8 (&cpu_buffer->mapping_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: ring_buffer_map+0xcf/0xe70 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> CachyOS#5 (&cpu_buffer->mapping_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}: __mutex_lock+0x192/0x18c0 ring_buffer_map+0xcf/0xe70 tracing_buffers_mmap+0x1c4/0x3b0 __mmap_region+0xd8d/0x1f70 do_mmap+0x9d7/0x1010 vm_mmap_pgoff+0x20b/0x390 ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x2e9/0x440 do_syscall_64+0x79/0x1c0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e -> CachyOS#4 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{4:4}: __might_fault+0xa5/0x110 _copy_to_user+0x22/0x80 _perf_ioctl+0x61b/0x1b70 perf_ioctl+0x62/0x90 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x134/0x190 do_syscall_64+0x79/0x1c0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e -> CachyOS#3 (&cpuctx_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}: __mutex_lock+0x192/0x18c0 perf_event_init_cpu+0x325/0x7c0 perf_event_init+0x52a/0x5b0 start_kernel+0x263/0x3e0 x86_64_start_reservations+0x24/0x30 x86_64_start_kernel+0x95/0xa0 common_startup_64+0x13e/0x141 -> CachyOS#2 (pmus_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}: __mutex_lock+0x192/0x18c0 perf_event_init_cpu+0xb7/0x7c0 cpuhp_invoke_callback+0x2c0/0x1030 __cpuhp_invoke_callback_range+0xbf/0x1f0 _cpu_up+0x2e7/0x690 cpu_up+0x117/0x170 cpuhp_bringup_mask+0xd5/0x120 bringup_nonboot_cpus+0x13d/0x170 smp_init+0x2b/0xf0 kernel_init_freeable+0x441/0x6d0 kernel_init+0x1e/0x160 ret_from_fork+0x34/0x70 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 -> CachyOS#1 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}: cpus_read_lock+0x2a/0xd0 ring_buffer_resize+0x610/0x14e0 __tracing_resize_ring_buffer.part.0+0x42/0x120 tracing_set_tracer+0x7bd/0xa80 tracing_set_trace_write+0x132/0x1e0 vfs_write+0x21c/0xe80 ksys_write+0xf9/0x1c0 do_syscall_64+0x79/0x1c0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e -> #0 (&buffer->mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}: __lock_acquire+0x1405/0x2210 lock_acquire+0x174/0x310 __mutex_lock+0x192/0x18c0 ring_buffer_map+0x11c/0xe70 tracing_buffers_mmap+0x1c4/0x3b0 __mmap_region+0xd8d/0x1f70 do_mmap+0x9d7/0x1010 vm_mmap_pgoff+0x20b/0x390 ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x2e9/0x440 do_syscall_64+0x79/0x1c0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &buffer->mutex --> &mm->mmap_lock --> &cpu_buffer->mapping_lock Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&cpu_buffer->mapping_lock); lock(&mm->mmap_lock); lock(&cpu_buffer->mapping_lock); lock(&buffer->mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 2 locks held by trace-cmd/1113: #0: ffff888106b847e0 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{4:4}, at: vm_mmap_pgoff+0x192/0x390 CachyOS#1: ffff888100a5f9f8 (&cpu_buffer->mapping_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: ring_buffer_map+0xcf/0xe70 stack backtrace: CPU: 5 UID: 0 PID: 1113 Comm: trace-cmd Not tainted 6.15.0-rc7-test-00002-gfb7d03d8a82f torvalds#551 PREEMPT Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x6e/0xa0 print_circular_bug.cold+0x178/0x1be check_noncircular+0x146/0x160 __lock_acquire+0x1405/0x2210 lock_acquire+0x174/0x310 ? ring_buffer_map+0x11c/0xe70 ? ring_buffer_map+0x11c/0xe70 ? __mutex_lock+0x169/0x18c0 __mutex_lock+0x192/0x18c0 ? ring_buffer_map+0x11c/0xe70 ? ring_buffer_map+0x11c/0xe70 ? function_trace_call+0x296/0x370 ? __pfx___mutex_lock+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_function_trace_call+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx___mutex_lock+0x10/0x10 ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x2d/0x50 ? ring_buffer_map+0x11c/0xe70 ? ring_buffer_map+0x11c/0xe70 ? __mutex_lock+0x5/0x18c0 ring_buffer_map+0x11c/0xe70 ? do_raw_spin_lock+0x12d/0x270 ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80 ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x2d/0x50 ? rcu_is_watching+0x15/0xb0 ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x2d/0x50 ? trace_preempt_on+0xd0/0x110 tracing_buffers_mmap+0x1c4/0x3b0 __mmap_region+0xd8d/0x1f70 ? ring_buffer_lock_reserve+0x99/0xff0 ? __pfx___mmap_region+0x10/0x10 ? ring_buffer_lock_reserve+0x99/0xff0 ? __pfx_ring_buffer_lock_reserve+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_ring_buffer_lock_reserve+0x10/0x10 ? bpf_lsm_mmap_addr+0x4/0x10 ? security_mmap_addr+0x46/0xd0 ? lock_is_held_type+0xd9/0x130 do_mmap+0x9d7/0x1010 ? 0xffffffffc0370095 ? __pfx_do_mmap+0x10/0x10 vm_mmap_pgoff+0x20b/0x390 ? __pfx_vm_mmap_pgoff+0x10/0x10 ? 0xffffffffc0370095 ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x2e9/0x440 do_syscall_64+0x79/0x1c0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e RIP: 0033:0x7fb0963a7de2 Code: 00 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 41 f7 c1 ff 0f 00 00 75 27 55 89 cd 53 48 89 fb 48 85 ff 74 3b 41 89 ea 48 89 df b8 09 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 76 5b 5d c3 0f 1f 00 48 8b 05 e1 9f 0d 00 64 RSP: 002b:00007ffdcc8fb878 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000009 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007fb0963a7de2 RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000001000 RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: 0000000000000001 R08: 0000000000000006 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 00007ffdcc8fbe68 R14: 00007fb096628000 R15: 00005633e01a5c90 </TASK> The issue is that cpus_read_lock() is taken within buffer->mutex. The memory mapped pages are taken with the mmap_lock held. The buffer->mutex is taken within the cpu_buffer->mapping_lock. There's quite a chain with all these locks, where the deadlock can be fixed by moving the cpus_read_lock() outside the taking of the buffer->mutex. Cc: [email protected] Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <[email protected]> Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]> Cc: Vincent Donnefort <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/[email protected] Fixes: 117c392 ("ring-buffer: Introducing ring-buffer mapping functions") Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <[email protected]>

Restore KVM's handling of a NULL kvm_x86_ops.mem_enc_ioctl, as the hook is NULL on SVM when CONFIG_KVM_AMD_SEV=n, and TDX will soon follow suit. ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at arch/x86/include/asm/kvm-x86-ops.h:130 kvm_x86_vendor_init+0x178b/0x18e0 Modules linked in: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.15.0-rc2-dc1aead1a985-sink-vm CachyOS#2 NONE Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 RIP: 0010:kvm_x86_vendor_init+0x178b/0x18e0 Call Trace: <TASK> svm_init+0x2e/0x60 do_one_initcall+0x56/0x290 kernel_init_freeable+0x192/0x1e0 kernel_init+0x16/0x130 ret_from_fork+0x30/0x50 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 </TASK> ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- Opportunistically drop the superfluous curly braces. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected] Fixes: b2aaf38 ("KVM: TDX: Add place holder for TDX VM specific mem_enc_op ioctl") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <[email protected]>

Despite the fact that several lockdep-related checks are skipped when calling trylock* versions of the locking primitives, for example mutex_trylock, each time the mutex is acquired, a held_lock is still placed onto the lockdep stack by __lock_acquire() which is called regardless of whether the trylock* or regular locking API was used. This means that if the caller successfully acquires more than MAX_LOCK_DEPTH locks of the same class, even when using mutex_trylock, lockdep will still complain that the maximum depth of the held lock stack has been reached and disable itself. For example, the following error currently occurs in the ARM version of KVM, once the code tries to lock all vCPUs of a VM configured with more than MAX_LOCK_DEPTH vCPUs, a situation that can easily happen on modern systems, where having more than 48 CPUs is common, and it's also common to run VMs that have vCPU counts approaching that number: [ 328.171264] BUG: MAX_LOCK_DEPTH too low! [ 328.175227] turning off the locking correctness validator. [ 328.180726] Please attach the output of /proc/lock_stat to the bug report [ 328.187531] depth: 48 max: 48! [ 328.190678] 48 locks held by qemu-kvm/11664: [ 328.194957] #0: ffff800086de5ba0 (&kvm->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kvm_ioctl_create_device+0x174/0x5b0 [ 328.204048] CachyOS#1: ffff0800e78800b8 (&vcpu->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: lock_all_vcpus+0x16c/0x2a0 [ 328.212521] CachyOS#2: ffff07ffeee51e98 (&vcpu->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: lock_all_vcpus+0x16c/0x2a0 [ 328.220991] CachyOS#3: ffff0800dc7d80b8 (&vcpu->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: lock_all_vcpus+0x16c/0x2a0 [ 328.229463] CachyOS#4: ffff07ffe0c980b8 (&vcpu->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: lock_all_vcpus+0x16c/0x2a0 [ 328.237934] CachyOS#5: ffff0800a3883c78 (&vcpu->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: lock_all_vcpus+0x16c/0x2a0 [ 328.246405] torvalds#6: ffff07fffbe480b8 (&vcpu->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: lock_all_vcpus+0x16c/0x2a0 Luckily, in all instances that require locking all vCPUs, the 'kvm->lock' is taken a priori, and that fact makes it possible to use the little known feature of lockdep, called a 'nest_lock', to avoid this warning and subsequent lockdep self-disablement. The action of 'nested lock' being provided to lockdep's lock_acquire(), causes the lockdep to detect that the top of the held lock stack contains a lock of the same class and then increment its reference counter instead of pushing a new held_lock item onto that stack. See __lock_acquire for more information. Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <[email protected]> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]> Message-ID: <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <[email protected]>

Use kvm_trylock_all_vcpus instead of a custom implementation when locking all vCPUs of a VM, to avoid triggering a lockdep warning, in the case in which the VM is configured to have more than MAX_LOCK_DEPTH vCPUs. This fixes the following false lockdep warning: [ 328.171264] BUG: MAX_LOCK_DEPTH too low! [ 328.175227] turning off the locking correctness validator. [ 328.180726] Please attach the output of /proc/lock_stat to the bug report [ 328.187531] depth: 48 max: 48! [ 328.190678] 48 locks held by qemu-kvm/11664: [ 328.194957] #0: ffff800086de5ba0 (&kvm->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kvm_ioctl_create_device+0x174/0x5b0 [ 328.204048] CachyOS#1: ffff0800e78800b8 (&vcpu->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: lock_all_vcpus+0x16c/0x2a0 [ 328.212521] CachyOS#2: ffff07ffeee51e98 (&vcpu->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: lock_all_vcpus+0x16c/0x2a0 [ 328.220991] CachyOS#3: ffff0800dc7d80b8 (&vcpu->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: lock_all_vcpus+0x16c/0x2a0 [ 328.229463] CachyOS#4: ffff07ffe0c980b8 (&vcpu->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: lock_all_vcpus+0x16c/0x2a0 [ 328.237934] CachyOS#5: ffff0800a3883c78 (&vcpu->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: lock_all_vcpus+0x16c/0x2a0 [ 328.246405] torvalds#6: ffff07fffbe480b8 (&vcpu->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: lock_all_vcpus+0x16c/0x2a0 Suggested-by: Paolo Bonzini <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <[email protected]> Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <[email protected]> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]> Message-ID: <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <[email protected]>

Add a compile-time check that `*$ptr` is of the type of `$type->$($f)*`. Rename those placeholders for clarity. Given the incorrect usage: > diff --git a/rust/kernel/rbtree.rs b/rust/kernel/rbtree.rs > index 8d978c8..6a7089149878 100644 > --- a/rust/kernel/rbtree.rs > +++ b/rust/kernel/rbtree.rs > @@ -329,7 +329,7 @@ fn raw_entry(&mut self, key: &K) -> RawEntry<'_, K, V> { > while !(*child_field_of_parent).is_null() { > let curr = *child_field_of_parent; > // SAFETY: All links fields we create are in a `Node<K, V>`. > - let node = unsafe { container_of!(curr, Node<K, V>, links) }; > + let node = unsafe { container_of!(curr, Node<K, V>, key) }; > > // SAFETY: `node` is a non-null node so it is valid by the type invariants. > match key.cmp(unsafe { &(*node).key }) { this patch produces the compilation error: > error[E0308]: mismatched types > --> rust/kernel/lib.rs:220:45 > | > 220 | $crate::assert_same_type(field_ptr, (&raw const (*container_ptr).$($fields)*).cast_mut()); > | ------------------------ --------- ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ expected `*mut rb_node`, found `*mut K` > | | | > | | expected all arguments to be this `*mut bindings::rb_node` type because they need to match the type of this parameter > | arguments to this function are incorrect > | > ::: rust/kernel/rbtree.rs:270:6 > | > 270 | impl<K, V> RBTree<K, V> > | - found this type parameter > ... > 332 | let node = unsafe { container_of!(curr, Node<K, V>, key) }; > | ------------------------------------ in this macro invocation > | > = note: expected raw pointer `*mut bindings::rb_node` > found raw pointer `*mut K` > note: function defined here > --> rust/kernel/lib.rs:227:8 > | > 227 | pub fn assert_same_type<T>(_: T, _: T) {} > | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ - ---- ---- this parameter needs to match the `*mut bindings::rb_node` type of parameter CachyOS#1 > | | | > | | parameter CachyOS#2 needs to match the `*mut bindings::rb_node` type of this parameter > | parameter CachyOS#1 and parameter CachyOS#2 both reference this parameter `T` > = note: this error originates in the macro `container_of` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) [ We decided to go with a variation of v1 [1] that became v4, since it seems like the obvious approach, the error messages seem good enough and the debug performance should be fine, given the kernel is always built with -O2. In the future, we may want to make the helper non-hidden, with proper documentation, for others to use. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/CANiq72kQWNfSV0KK6qs6oJt+aGdgY=hXg=wJcmK3zYcokY1LNw@mail.gmail.com/ - Miguel ] Suggested-by: Alice Ryhl <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAH5fLgh6gmqGBhPMi2SKn7mCmMWfOSiS0WP5wBuGPYh9ZTAiww@mail.gmail.com/ Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] [ Added intra-doc link. - Miguel ] Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <[email protected]>

Don't set WDM_READ flag in wdm_in_callback() for ZLP-s, otherwise when userspace tries to poll for available data, it might - incorrectly - believe there is something available, and when it tries to non-blocking read it, it might get stuck in the read loop. For example this is what glib does for non-blocking read (briefly): 1. poll() 2. if poll returns with non-zero, starts a read data loop: a. loop on poll() (EINTR disabled) b. if revents was set, reads data I. if read returns with EINTR or EAGAIN, goto 2.a. II. otherwise return with data So if ZLP sets WDM_READ (CachyOS#1), we expect data, and try to read it (CachyOS#2). But as that was a ZLP, and we are doing non-blocking read, wdm_read() returns with EAGAIN (CachyOS#2.b.I), so loop again, and try to read again (CachyOS#2.a.). With glib, we might stuck in this loop forever, as EINTR is disabled (CachyOS#2.a). Signed-off-by: Robert Hodaszi <[email protected]> Acked-by: Oliver Neukum <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

…/kernel/git/kvmarm/kvmarm into HEAD KVM/arm64 fixes for 6.16, take CachyOS#2 - Rework of system register accessors for system registers that are directly writen to memory, so that sanitisation of the in-memory value happens at the correct time (after the read, or before the write). For convenience, RMW-style accessors are also provided. - Multiple fixes for the so-called "arch-timer-edge-cases' selftest, which was always broken.

[ Upstream commit ee684de ] As shown in [1], it is possible to corrupt a BPF ELF file such that arbitrary BPF instructions are loaded by libbpf. This can be done by setting a symbol (BPF program) section offset to a large (unsigned) number such that <section start + symbol offset> overflows and points before the section data in the memory. Consider the situation below where: - prog_start = sec_start + symbol_offset <-- size_t overflow here - prog_end = prog_start + prog_size prog_start sec_start prog_end sec_end | | | | v v v v .....................|################################|............ The report in [1] also provides a corrupted BPF ELF which can be used as a reproducer: $ readelf -S crash Section Headers: [Nr] Name Type Address Offset Size EntSize Flags Link Info Align ... [ 2] uretprobe.mu[...] PROGBITS 0000000000000000 00000040 0000000000000068 0000000000000000 AX 0 0 8 $ readelf -s crash Symbol table '.symtab' contains 8 entries: Num: Value Size Type Bind Vis Ndx Name ... 6: ffffffffffffffb8 104 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT 2 handle_tp Here, the handle_tp prog has section offset ffffffffffffffb8, i.e. will point before the actual memory where section 2 is allocated. This is also reported by AddressSanitizer: ================================================================= ==1232==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow on address 0x7c7302fe0000 at pc 0x7fc3046e4b77 bp 0x7ffe64677cd0 sp 0x7ffe64677490 READ of size 104 at 0x7c7302fe0000 thread T0 #0 0x7fc3046e4b76 in memcpy (/lib64/libasan.so.8+0xe4b76) #1 0x00000040df3e in bpf_object__init_prog /src/libbpf/src/libbpf.c:856 #2 0x00000040df3e in bpf_object__add_programs /src/libbpf/src/libbpf.c:928 #3 0x00000040df3e in bpf_object__elf_collect /src/libbpf/src/libbpf.c:3930 #4 0x00000040df3e in bpf_object_open /src/libbpf/src/libbpf.c:8067 #5 0x00000040f176 in bpf_object__open_file /src/libbpf/src/libbpf.c:8090 torvalds#6 0x000000400c16 in main /poc/poc.c:8 torvalds#7 0x7fc3043d25b4 in __libc_start_call_main (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x35b4) torvalds#8 0x7fc3043d2667 in __libc_start_main@@GLIBC_2.34 (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x3667) torvalds#9 0x000000400b34 in _start (/poc/poc+0x400b34) 0x7c7302fe0000 is located 64 bytes before 104-byte region [0x7c7302fe0040,0x7c7302fe00a8) allocated by thread T0 here: #0 0x7fc3046e716b in malloc (/lib64/libasan.so.8+0xe716b) #1 0x7fc3045ee600 in __libelf_set_rawdata_wrlock (/lib64/libelf.so.1+0xb600) #2 0x7fc3045ef018 in __elf_getdata_rdlock (/lib64/libelf.so.1+0xc018) #3 0x00000040642f in elf_sec_data /src/libbpf/src/libbpf.c:3740 The problem here is that currently, libbpf only checks that the program end is within the section bounds. There used to be a check `while (sec_off < sec_sz)` in bpf_object__add_programs, however, it was removed by commit 6245947 ("libbpf: Allow gaps in BPF program sections to support overriden weak functions"). Add a check for detecting the overflow of `sec_off + prog_sz` to bpf_object__init_prog to fix this issue. [1] https://github.com/lmarch2/poc/blob/main/libbpf/libbpf.md Fixes: 6245947 ("libbpf: Allow gaps in BPF program sections to support overriden weak functions") Reported-by: lmarch2 <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Viktor Malik <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <[email protected]> Link: https://github.com/lmarch2/poc/blob/main/libbpf/libbpf.md Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>

commit c98cc97 upstream. Running a modified trace-cmd record --nosplice where it does a mmap of the ring buffer when '--nosplice' is set, caused the following lockdep splat: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.15.0-rc7-test-00002-gfb7d03d8a82f torvalds#551 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ trace-cmd/1113 is trying to acquire lock: ffff888100062888 (&buffer->mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: ring_buffer_map+0x11c/0xe70 but task is already holding lock: ffff888100a5f9f8 (&cpu_buffer->mapping_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: ring_buffer_map+0xcf/0xe70 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #5 (&cpu_buffer->mapping_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}: __mutex_lock+0x192/0x18c0 ring_buffer_map+0xcf/0xe70 tracing_buffers_mmap+0x1c4/0x3b0 __mmap_region+0xd8d/0x1f70 do_mmap+0x9d7/0x1010 vm_mmap_pgoff+0x20b/0x390 ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x2e9/0x440 do_syscall_64+0x79/0x1c0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e -> #4 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{4:4}: __might_fault+0xa5/0x110 _copy_to_user+0x22/0x80 _perf_ioctl+0x61b/0x1b70 perf_ioctl+0x62/0x90 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x134/0x190 do_syscall_64+0x79/0x1c0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e -> #3 (&cpuctx_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}: __mutex_lock+0x192/0x18c0 perf_event_init_cpu+0x325/0x7c0 perf_event_init+0x52a/0x5b0 start_kernel+0x263/0x3e0 x86_64_start_reservations+0x24/0x30 x86_64_start_kernel+0x95/0xa0 common_startup_64+0x13e/0x141 -> #2 (pmus_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}: __mutex_lock+0x192/0x18c0 perf_event_init_cpu+0xb7/0x7c0 cpuhp_invoke_callback+0x2c0/0x1030 __cpuhp_invoke_callback_range+0xbf/0x1f0 _cpu_up+0x2e7/0x690 cpu_up+0x117/0x170 cpuhp_bringup_mask+0xd5/0x120 bringup_nonboot_cpus+0x13d/0x170 smp_init+0x2b/0xf0 kernel_init_freeable+0x441/0x6d0 kernel_init+0x1e/0x160 ret_from_fork+0x34/0x70 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 -> #1 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}: cpus_read_lock+0x2a/0xd0 ring_buffer_resize+0x610/0x14e0 __tracing_resize_ring_buffer.part.0+0x42/0x120 tracing_set_tracer+0x7bd/0xa80 tracing_set_trace_write+0x132/0x1e0 vfs_write+0x21c/0xe80 ksys_write+0xf9/0x1c0 do_syscall_64+0x79/0x1c0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e -> #0 (&buffer->mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}: __lock_acquire+0x1405/0x2210 lock_acquire+0x174/0x310 __mutex_lock+0x192/0x18c0 ring_buffer_map+0x11c/0xe70 tracing_buffers_mmap+0x1c4/0x3b0 __mmap_region+0xd8d/0x1f70 do_mmap+0x9d7/0x1010 vm_mmap_pgoff+0x20b/0x390 ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x2e9/0x440 do_syscall_64+0x79/0x1c0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &buffer->mutex --> &mm->mmap_lock --> &cpu_buffer->mapping_lock Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&cpu_buffer->mapping_lock); lock(&mm->mmap_lock); lock(&cpu_buffer->mapping_lock); lock(&buffer->mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 2 locks held by trace-cmd/1113: #0: ffff888106b847e0 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{4:4}, at: vm_mmap_pgoff+0x192/0x390 #1: ffff888100a5f9f8 (&cpu_buffer->mapping_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: ring_buffer_map+0xcf/0xe70 stack backtrace: CPU: 5 UID: 0 PID: 1113 Comm: trace-cmd Not tainted 6.15.0-rc7-test-00002-gfb7d03d8a82f torvalds#551 PREEMPT Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x6e/0xa0 print_circular_bug.cold+0x178/0x1be check_noncircular+0x146/0x160 __lock_acquire+0x1405/0x2210 lock_acquire+0x174/0x310 ? ring_buffer_map+0x11c/0xe70 ? ring_buffer_map+0x11c/0xe70 ? __mutex_lock+0x169/0x18c0 __mutex_lock+0x192/0x18c0 ? ring_buffer_map+0x11c/0xe70 ? ring_buffer_map+0x11c/0xe70 ? function_trace_call+0x296/0x370 ? __pfx___mutex_lock+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_function_trace_call+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx___mutex_lock+0x10/0x10 ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x2d/0x50 ? ring_buffer_map+0x11c/0xe70 ? ring_buffer_map+0x11c/0xe70 ? __mutex_lock+0x5/0x18c0 ring_buffer_map+0x11c/0xe70 ? do_raw_spin_lock+0x12d/0x270 ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80 ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x2d/0x50 ? rcu_is_watching+0x15/0xb0 ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x2d/0x50 ? trace_preempt_on+0xd0/0x110 tracing_buffers_mmap+0x1c4/0x3b0 __mmap_region+0xd8d/0x1f70 ? ring_buffer_lock_reserve+0x99/0xff0 ? __pfx___mmap_region+0x10/0x10 ? ring_buffer_lock_reserve+0x99/0xff0 ? __pfx_ring_buffer_lock_reserve+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_ring_buffer_lock_reserve+0x10/0x10 ? bpf_lsm_mmap_addr+0x4/0x10 ? security_mmap_addr+0x46/0xd0 ? lock_is_held_type+0xd9/0x130 do_mmap+0x9d7/0x1010 ? 0xffffffffc0370095 ? __pfx_do_mmap+0x10/0x10 vm_mmap_pgoff+0x20b/0x390 ? __pfx_vm_mmap_pgoff+0x10/0x10 ? 0xffffffffc0370095 ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x2e9/0x440 do_syscall_64+0x79/0x1c0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e RIP: 0033:0x7fb0963a7de2 Code: 00 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 41 f7 c1 ff 0f 00 00 75 27 55 89 cd 53 48 89 fb 48 85 ff 74 3b 41 89 ea 48 89 df b8 09 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 76 5b 5d c3 0f 1f 00 48 8b 05 e1 9f 0d 00 64 RSP: 002b:00007ffdcc8fb878 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000009 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007fb0963a7de2 RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000001000 RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: 0000000000000001 R08: 0000000000000006 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 00007ffdcc8fbe68 R14: 00007fb096628000 R15: 00005633e01a5c90 </TASK> The issue is that cpus_read_lock() is taken within buffer->mutex. The memory mapped pages are taken with the mmap_lock held. The buffer->mutex is taken within the cpu_buffer->mapping_lock. There's quite a chain with all these locks, where the deadlock can be fixed by moving the cpus_read_lock() outside the taking of the buffer->mutex. Cc: [email protected] Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <[email protected]> Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]> Cc: Vincent Donnefort <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/[email protected] Fixes: 117c392 ("ring-buffer: Introducing ring-buffer mapping functions") Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

kerneltoast added 8 commits September 23, 2023 18:32

mm: Disable proactive compaction by default

2e3cb1a

On-demand compaction works fine assuming that you don't have a need to spam the page allocator nonstop for large order page allocations. Signed-off-by: Sultan Alsawaf <[email protected]>

ptr1337 merged commit ec3dcef into CachyOS:6.5/cachy Sep 23, 2023

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Uh oh!

6.5: mm patches #2

6.5: mm patches #2

Uh oh!

Rasenkai commented Sep 23, 2023

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

6.5: mm patches #2

6.5: mm patches #2

Uh oh!

Conversation

Rasenkai commented Sep 23, 2023

Uh oh!

Uh oh!