Skip to content

Allow Sphinx v5 #79

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 25, 2022
Merged

Allow Sphinx v5 #79

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 25, 2022

Conversation

EpicWink
Copy link
Contributor

Allow and explicitly test against Sphinx v5

Fix #78

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 19, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #79 (71bf369) into master (2839945) will increase coverage by 0.64%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #79      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   84.19%   84.83%   +0.64%     
==========================================
  Files           1        1              
  Lines         310      310              
==========================================
+ Hits          261      263       +2     
+ Misses         49       47       -2     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
autodocsumm/__init__.py 84.83% <0.00%> (+0.64%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 2839945...71bf369. Read the comment docs.

@Chilipp
Copy link
Owner

Chilipp commented Jul 19, 2022

Ah sorry, forgot about this issue @EpicWink thanks for contributing!

@jenshnielsen
Copy link

@Chilipp Thanks for an awesome package IMHO it makes navigating the autogenerated docs so much better.
Any chance we can see a new release with sphinx 5 support soon. I have been working on a patch for sphinx.ext.autosummary in sphinx-doc/sphinx#10691 which fixes documentation of inherited attributes, This resolves the one problem that I have been having with autodocsumm but the branch targets sphinx 5.x

@Chilipp
Copy link
Owner

Chilipp commented Jul 25, 2022

hey @jenshnielsen! yes, sure. sorry

@Chilipp Chilipp merged commit c3689c9 into Chilipp:master Jul 25, 2022
@EpicWink EpicWink deleted the sphinx-5 branch July 25, 2022 06:44
@lafrech lafrech mentioned this pull request Jan 9, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Sphinx 5 support
3 participants