-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.4k
[Ai-assisted] CLC work stealing #2218
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
drisspg
wants to merge
1
commit into
drisspg/stack/9
Choose a base branch
from
drisspg/stack/8
base: drisspg/stack/9
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
+476
−43
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
drisspg
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 31, 2026
stack-info: PR: #2218, branch: drisspg/stack/8
f711f1d to
d58e003
Compare
Merged
Member
|
I like the direction, CLC is the right thing to do |
Member
|
Cc @tzadouri who’s thinking about scheduling and persistence |
d58e003 to
784f382
Compare
drisspg
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 1, 2026
stack-info: PR: #2218, branch: drisspg/stack/8
drisspg
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 3, 2026
stack-info: PR: #2218, branch: drisspg/stack/8
784f382 to
bb52b18
Compare
drisspg
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 3, 2026
stack-info: PR: #2218, branch: drisspg/stack/8
bb52b18 to
0f3f1e4
Compare
drisspg
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 3, 2026
stack-info: PR: #2218, branch: drisspg/stack/8
0f3f1e4 to
0c8bed0
Compare
fe1d244 to
37ffcbb
Compare
Merged
drisspg
added a commit
to drisspg/flash-attention
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 8, 2026
stack-info: PR: Dao-AILab#2218, branch: drisspg/stack/8
37ffcbb to
334b430
Compare
drisspg
added a commit
to drisspg/flash-attention
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 8, 2026
stack-info: PR: Dao-AILab#2218, branch: drisspg/stack/8
334b430 to
deb3169
Compare
c51662c to
02c01cc
Compare
drisspg
added a commit
to drisspg/flash-attention
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 8, 2026
stack-info: PR: Dao-AILab#2218, branch: drisspg/stack/8
deb3169 to
2a94a14
Compare
drisspg
added a commit
to drisspg/flash-attention
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 8, 2026
stack-info: PR: Dao-AILab#2218, branch: drisspg/stack/8
2a94a14 to
8cb4f3a
Compare
stack-info: PR: #2218, branch: drisspg/stack/8
8cb4f3a to
ca437b1
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Stacked PRs:
[Draft][Ai-assisted] CLC work stealing
Not for land yet; the scheduling leaking abstraction all over the place is bad, im going to find a better way to encapsulate that.
I had to help alot on this one even though claude and codex did most of the setup.
Example work steal "trace" recreated from printf logs

Perf run
We would expect the highest gain for the most imbalanced workloads with the current scheduling for flex; We kind of see that e.g. alibi + causal are the same and dont currently have lpt schedule set. Document mask also sees a nice boost which makes sense
I dont really know why noop (fully dense fa4 with no sparsity and no scoremod) takes a hit for hdim 64 but only on NON - GQA path, the pattern looks too regular to be chance
What is needed to figure out before land