Skip to content

Make the threshold segmentation compatible with MS SQL Server #136

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 13, 2025

Conversation

mvanwyk
Copy link
Contributor

@mvanwyk mvanwyk commented Mar 13, 2025

fix: update total metrics calculation and ensure float division for accuracy

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Improved calculations for performance metrics to ensure more accurate results through enhanced precision in operations.

@mvanwyk mvanwyk requested a review from Copilot March 13, 2025 08:03
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 13, 2025

Walkthrough

The changes update the _calc_seg_stats function in pyretailscience/analysis/segmentation.py to simplify total metrics calculation. The group-by operation for computing total metrics was replaced by direct aggregation with a mutation to add a segment_name of "Total". Additionally, the code now casts denominators to float in several divisions, ensuring floating-point precision and consistency in the computed metrics.

Changes

File Change Summary
pyretailscience/.../segmentation.py Modified _calc_seg_stats: replaced group-by aggregation with direct aggregation plus mutation; applied float casting for division operations in multiple metrics.

Possibly related PRs

  • feat: changed threshold seg to use ibis #89: Updates to _calc_seg_stats and handling of segment_name are directly connected to the modifications in the SegTransactionStats class, which also involved changing segment_id to segment_name.

Suggested labels

enhancement, Review effort [1-5]: 3

Poem

I'm a hopping rabbit in the code garden bright,
Crunching numbers by day and nibbling bytes by night.
Total metrics now flow with smooth, floaty precision,
Leaving integer woes in a simpler, eager revision.
With a twitch of my nose, I celebrate this code incantation!

Tip

⚡🧪 Multi-step agentic review comment chat (experimental)
  • We're introducing multi-step agentic chat in review comments. This experimental feature enhances review discussions with the CodeRabbit agentic chat by enabling advanced interactions, including the ability to create pull requests directly from comments.
    - To enable this feature, set early_access to true under in the settings.
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This pull request updates the total metrics calculation in the segmentation analysis to ensure compatibility with MS SQL Server and improve accuracy with float division.

  • Updated the total metrics calculation to use aggregate followed by mutate.
  • Changed division operations to apply float casts for accurate metric calculations.
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

pyretailscience/analysis/segmentation.py:281

  • The new total_metrics dataframe uses the column 'segment_name', which may be inconsistent with the grouping column name used in segment_metrics. Consider renaming 'segment_name' to match the original segment column name to ensure compatibility during the union operation.
total_metrics = data.aggregate(**aggs).mutate(segment_name=ibis.literal("Total"))

@mvanwyk mvanwyk requested a review from mayurkmmt March 13, 2025 08:04
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
pyretailscience/analysis/segmentation.py (2)

287-288: Consider adding float casting for all division operations

While you've added float casting for some metrics, there are other division operations that might benefit from explicit float casting for consistency, such as:

  • calc_spend_per_cust
  • calc_spend_per_trans

This would make the code more consistent and ensure floating-point division throughout all calculations.

-                cols.calc_spend_per_cust: ibis._[cols.agg_unit_spend] / ibis._[cols.agg_customer_id],
-                cols.calc_spend_per_trans: ibis._[cols.agg_unit_spend] / ibis._[cols.agg_transaction_id],
+                cols.calc_spend_per_cust: ibis._[cols.agg_unit_spend] / ibis._[cols.agg_customer_id].cast("float"),
+                cols.calc_spend_per_trans: ibis._[cols.agg_unit_spend] / ibis._[cols.agg_transaction_id].cast("float"),

297-297: Consider adding float casting for price_per_unit calculation

For consistency with the other division operations that now use float casting, consider adding a cast to float for the divisor in the price_per_unit calculation as well.

-                    cols.calc_price_per_unit: ibis._[cols.agg_unit_spend] / ibis._[cols.agg_unit_qty].nullif(0),
+                    cols.calc_price_per_unit: ibis._[cols.agg_unit_spend] / ibis._[cols.agg_unit_qty].cast("float").nullif(0),
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 03a205f and 2e11253.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • pyretailscience/analysis/segmentation.py (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
pyretailscience/analysis/segmentation.py (3)

281-281: Improved total metrics calculation

This change simplifies the total metrics calculation by directly aggregating the data and then adding the "Total" segment name through mutation instead of using a group-by operation. This approach should be more compatible with MS SQL Server while maintaining the same functionality.


289-290: Proper floating-point division

Casting the denominators to float ensures accurate calculations by preventing integer division, which could lead to truncation errors. This is particularly important for metrics like transactions per customer and customer percentages where precision matters.


298-299: Consistent floating-point division for unit metrics

The cast to float for the transaction count denominator ensures that units per transaction calculations maintain decimal precision, consistent with the other metric calculations in the file.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 13, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
pyretailscience/analysis/segmentation.py 69.01% <100.00%> (ø)

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@mvanwyk mvanwyk merged commit 79df620 into main Mar 13, 2025
3 checks passed
@mvanwyk mvanwyk deleted the fix/threshold_seg_mssql branch March 13, 2025 08:09
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Mar 25, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants