Skip to content

product association #149

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 21, 2025
Merged

product association #149

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 21, 2025

Conversation

mayurkmmt
Copy link
Collaborator

@mayurkmmt mayurkmmt commented Mar 21, 2025

User description

fix: added function to convert ibis tablee into df


PR Type

Enhancement, Tests


Description

  • Refactored ProductAssociation class to improve data handling.

  • Added a property method to execute and return DataFrame.

  • Updated tests to align with the refactored class structure.

  • Improved code readability and consistency in method usage.


Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files
Enhancement
product_association.py
Refactored `ProductAssociation` class for better data handling

pyretailscience/analysis/product_association.py

  • Introduced _df attribute and df property for DataFrame execution.
  • Replaced self.df with self.table for internal association
    calculations.
  • Adjusted _calc_association method to return a sorted and renamed
    result.
  • Improved method consistency and added a property for lazy DataFrame
    execution.
  • +17/-5   
    Tests
    test_product_association.py
    Updated tests for refactored `ProductAssociation` class   

    tests/analysis/test_product_association.py

  • Updated tests to use the refactored ProductAssociation class.
  • Replaced direct method calls with class instantiation and df property.
  • Ensured tests validate results against the executed DataFrame.
  • Improved test consistency with the new class structure.
  • +21/-16 

    Need help?
  • Type /help how to ... in the comments thread for any questions about Qodo Merge usage.
  • Check out the documentation for more information.
  • Summary by CodeRabbit

    • Refactor

      • Streamlined the processing logic for product association calculations, leading to more consistent and efficient result ordering and mapping.
    • Tests

      • Updated test scenarios to validate the new instance-based workflow, ensuring reliable and accurate outcomes.

    Copy link

    coderabbitai bot commented Mar 21, 2025

    Walkthrough

    The changes update the ProductAssociation class by introducing a new private attribute _df and renaming the original df attribute to table within the constructor. The _calc_association method now utilizes order_by for sorting and performs column renaming in a single call. A new property method df is added to execute and return the DataFrame when needed. Additionally, the test suite now instantiates the ProductAssociation class directly and accesses the association results via the new df property.

    Changes

    File Change Summary
    pyretailscience/analysis/product_association.py Introduced _df as a private attribute; renamed df to table in the constructor; added a new df property method; modified _calc_association to use order_by and a single rename.
    tests/analysis/test_product_association.py Updated tests to instantiate ProductAssociation directly and access association results via the new df property, with assertions adjusted accordingly.

    Sequence Diagram(s)

    sequenceDiagram
        participant Test as Test Suite
        participant PA as ProductAssociation
        participant DF as DataFrame Executor
    
        Test->>PA: Instantiate ProductAssociation
        PA->>PA: Call _calc_association to build table
        Test->>PA: Access df property
        PA->>PA: Check if _df is None
        PA->>DF: Execute table and reset index
        DF-->>PA: Return DataFrame
        PA-->>Test: Provide DataFrame via df property
    
    Loading

    Possibly related PRs

    Suggested labels

    enhancement, Tests, Review effort [1-5]: 3

    Suggested reviewers

    • murray-ds

    Poem

    In a garden of code, I hop with delight,
    Tweaking and toggling from morning to night.
    A new property sings, and tests now gleam bright,
    With order_by magic, everything’s just right.
    From _df to table, let our logic take flight!
    Happy coding, dear friend, amidst lines so tight.
    🐰🌟


    📜 Recent review details

    Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
    Review profile: CHILL
    Plan: Pro

    📥 Commits

    Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 919ad00 and 8133202.

    📒 Files selected for processing (2)
    • pyretailscience/analysis/product_association.py (4 hunks)
    • tests/analysis/test_product_association.py (6 hunks)
    🧰 Additional context used
    🧬 Code Definitions (1)
    tests/analysis/test_product_association.py (1)
    pyretailscience/analysis/product_association.py (2) (2)
    • ProductAssociation (44-335)
    • df (331-335)
    🔇 Additional comments (11)
    pyretailscience/analysis/product_association.py (4)

    83-84: Good addition of a private attribute for lazy evaluation.

    Adding the _df private attribute initialized to None enables lazy execution of the ibis table, which is a performance improvement. This follows good practices for handling potentially costly computations.


    129-129: Appropriate renaming of attribute from df to table.

    Renaming from self.df to self.table more accurately represents that the attribute stores an ibis Table rather than a pandas DataFrame. This improves code clarity and makes the distinction between the ibis Table and the actual DataFrame clearer.


    310-316: Good optimization using ibis operations.

    This change improves performance by:

    1. Using order_by instead of .execute().sort_values(), which keeps operations within the ibis query engine
    2. Consolidating the column renaming into a single dictionary-based call

    These changes avoid premature execution of the ibis table and make the code more concise.


    330-335: Well-implemented property method for lazy evaluation.

    The df property method implements the lazy evaluation pattern correctly:

    1. Only executes the table when the DataFrame is first accessed
    2. Caches the result to avoid redundant computation
    3. Ensures consistent output by resetting the index

    This matches the PR objective of adding a function to convert an ibis table into a DataFrame.

    tests/analysis/test_product_association.py (7)

    109-115: Test properly updated to use the class instance.

    The test now correctly instantiates the ProductAssociation class directly instead of calling the static method, and accesses the result through the new df property. This better reflects how the class would be used in practice.


    121-128: Test properly updated to use the class instance with target item parameter.

    This test now correctly instantiates the ProductAssociation class with the target item parameter and accesses results through the df property, which is consistent with the new class design.


    139-146: Test properly updated to use the class instance with min_occurrences parameter.

    The test now correctly instantiates the ProductAssociation class with the min_occurrences parameter and accesses results through the df property, aligning with the new class design.


    159-166: Test properly updated to use the class instance with min_cooccurrences parameter.

    The test now correctly instantiates the ProductAssociation class with the min_cooccurrences parameter and accesses results through the df property, consistent with the new class design.


    178-185: Test properly updated to use the class instance with min_support parameter.

    The test now correctly instantiates the ProductAssociation class with the min_support parameter and accesses results through the df property, aligning with the new class design.


    197-204: Test properly updated to use the class instance with min_confidence parameter.

    The test now correctly instantiates the ProductAssociation class with the min_confidence parameter and accesses results through the df property, consistent with the new class design.


    216-223: Test properly updated to use the class instance with min_uplift parameter.

    The test now correctly instantiates the ProductAssociation class with the min_uplift parameter and accesses results through the df property, aligning with the new class design.

    ✨ Finishing Touches
    • 📝 Generate Docstrings

    Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

    ❤️ Share
    🪧 Tips

    Chat

    There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

    • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
      • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
      • Generate unit testing code for this file.
      • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
    • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
      • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
      • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
    • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
      • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
      • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
      • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
      • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

    Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

    CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

    • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
    • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
    • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
    • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
    • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
    • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
    • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
    • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
    • @coderabbitai help to get help.

    Other keywords and placeholders

    • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
    • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
    • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

    CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

    • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
    • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
    • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

    Documentation and Community

    • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
    • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
    • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

    Copy link
    Contributor

    Qodo Merge was enabled for this repository. To continue using it, please link your Git account with your Qodo account here.

    PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

    Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 2 🔵🔵⚪⚪⚪
    🧪 PR contains tests
    🔒 No security concerns identified
    ⚡ Recommended focus areas for review

    Column Renaming

    The renaming logic in _calc_association method may cause inconsistency. The method renames columns from "item_1"/"item_2" to value_col_1/value_col_2, but then immediately tries to return columns with value_col_1/value_col_2 names.

    final_result = final_result.rename(
        {
            f"{value_col}_1": "item_1",
            f"{value_col}_2": "item_2",
        },
    )
    return final_result[
        [
            f"{value_col}_1",
            f"{value_col}_2",
    Lazy Loading

    The df property implements lazy loading of the DataFrame, but there's no mechanism to invalidate the cached _df if the underlying table changes. This could lead to stale data being returned.

    @property
    def df(self) -> pd.DataFrame:
        """Returns the executed DataFrame."""
        if self._df is None:
            self._df = self.table.execute().reset_index(drop=True)
        return self._df

    Copy link
    Contributor

    Qodo Merge was enabled for this repository. To continue using it, please link your Git account with your Qodo account here.

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    Explore these optional code suggestions:

    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Impact
    Possible issue
    Fix column renaming logic

    The column renaming logic is reversed. You're trying to rename "item_1" to
    "value_col_1", but the code is doing the opposite. This will cause the returned
    DataFrame to have incorrect column names.

    pyretailscience/analysis/product_association.py [310-316]

     final_result = result.order_by(["item_1", "item_2"])
     final_result = final_result.rename(
         {
    -        f"{value_col}_1": "item_1",
    -        f"{value_col}_2": "item_2",
    +        "item_1": f"{value_col}_1",
    +        "item_2": f"{value_col}_2",
         },
     )
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 10

    __

    Why: The suggestion correctly identifies a critical bug in the column renaming logic. The current code is trying to rename f"{value_col}_1" to "item_1" when it should be the opposite. This would cause the method to fail when trying to access columns that don't exist after renaming.

    High
    Fix column selection

    After the incorrect column renaming, the method tries to select columns that
    don't exist in the DataFrame. This will cause an error when the code is executed
    because the columns were renamed incorrectly.

    pyretailscience/analysis/product_association.py [317-328]

     return final_result[
         [
    -        f"{value_col}_1",
    -        f"{value_col}_2",
    +        "item_1",
    +        "item_2",
             "occurrences_1",
             "occurrences_2",
             "cooccurrences",
             "support",
             "confidence",
             "uplift",
         ]
     ]
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9

    __

    Why: This suggestion correctly identifies a follow-up issue caused by the first bug. After the incorrect column renaming, the code tries to select columns with names that no longer exist, which would cause a runtime error. This is a critical fix that's directly related to the first issue.

    High
    • More

    Copy link

    codecov bot commented Mar 21, 2025

    Codecov Report

    Attention: Patch coverage is 88.88889% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

    Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
    pyretailscience/analysis/product_association.py 88.88% 0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
    Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
    pyretailscience/analysis/product_association.py 91.93% <88.88%> (+4.43%) ⬆️
    🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
    • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

    @mayurkmmt mayurkmmt merged commit d350ccb into main Mar 21, 2025
    3 checks passed
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    2 participants