Skip to content

feat: renamed the range_planning file to customer_decision_hierarchy #195

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 8, 2025

Conversation

mayurkmmt
Copy link
Collaborator

@mayurkmmt mayurkmmt commented Apr 8, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated the analysis documentation to feature the new Customer Decision Hierarchy content, replacing the previous Range Planning materials.
    • Refreshed the site navigation to highlight the updated analysis topic for improved user accessibility.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 8, 2025

Walkthrough

The changes update the module organization and corresponding documentation for analysis functionalities. References to “range planning” have been replaced with “customer decision hierarchy” across import statements, documentation files, and internal code comments. A new documentation file for the Customer Decision Hierarchy has been added while an obsolete Range Planning file has been removed. The navigation in the documentation configuration has also been updated accordingly, with no changes to the underlying functionality.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
docs/analysis_modules.md, tests/analysis/test_customer_decision_hierarchy.py Updated import statements and docstrings by changing references from pyretailscience.analysis.range_planning to pyretailscience.analysis.customer_decision_hierarchy.
docs/api/analysis/customer_decision_hierarchy.md, mkdocs.yml Added new documentation file and updated the navigation entry for Customer Decision Hierarchy, replacing the previous Range Planning entry.
docs/api/analysis/range_planning.md Removed the documentation file for Range Planning.
pyretailscience/analysis/customer_decision_hierarchy.py Updated module, class, and method docstrings to reflect customer decision hierarchy analysis instead of range planning analysis.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

documentation, Review effort [1-5]: 2

Poem

Hop, hop in the code forest green,
I’m a rabbit, coding keen.
From range planning to decisions clear,
New docs and paths now appear.
I nibble on changes with a joyful bite,
Celebrating a brighter path in sight!
🐰✨

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai plan to trigger planning for file edits and PR creation.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 8, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
...ailscience/analysis/customer_decision_hierarchy.py 42.00% <ø> (ø)
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
pyretailscience/analysis/customer_decision_hierarchy.py (2)

1-2: Module Docstring Inconsistency
The module docstring still refers to the “RangePlanning class” even though the class is now named CustomerDecisionHierarchy. For clarity and consistency, please change it to:
  "This module contains the CustomerDecisionHierarchy class for performing customer decision hierarchy analysis."


28-37: Docstring Update Required for init
Within the initializer’s docstring, the text still states "Initializes the RangePlanning object." This should be updated to refer to the CustomerDecisionHierarchy object so that the documentation fully reflects the renaming.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4e0bfac and 8ff4821.

📒 Files selected for processing (6)
  • docs/analysis_modules.md (1 hunks)
  • docs/api/analysis/customer_decision_hierarchy.md (1 hunks)
  • docs/api/analysis/range_planning.md (0 hunks)
  • mkdocs.yml (1 hunks)
  • pyretailscience/analysis/customer_decision_hierarchy.py (3 hunks)
  • tests/analysis/test_customer_decision_hierarchy.py (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • docs/api/analysis/range_planning.md
🔇 Additional comments (5)
docs/api/analysis/customer_decision_hierarchy.md (1)

1-4: New Documentation for Customer Decision Hierarchy
The new documentation file clearly introduces the Customer Decision Hierarchy module and uses the standard “::: pyretailscience.analysis.customer_decision_hierarchy” directive, ensuring that readers are directed to the correct API documentation.

mkdocs.yml (1)

28-28: Navigation Update: Added Customer Decision Hierarchy Entry
The navigation has been updated to include the "Customer Decision Hierarchy" entry pointing to the correct documentation file. This update maintains consistency with the module rename.

docs/analysis_modules.md (1)

742-750: Updated Import for Customer Decision Hierarchy
The import statement now correctly reflects the new module path with:
  from pyretailscience.analysis.customer_decision_hierarchy import CustomerDecisionHierarchy
and subsequent usage in instantiation and plotting are consistent. This aligns the documentation with the module restructuring.

tests/analysis/test_customer_decision_hierarchy.py (1)

7-7: Updated Module Import in Test File
The import on line 7 has been updated to import from pyretailscience.analysis.customer_decision_hierarchy rather than the deprecated path. This change is consistent with the new module structure and ensures that tests are run against the correct implementation.

pyretailscience/analysis/customer_decision_hierarchy.py (1)

234-247: Updated Plot Method Documentation
The plot method’s docstring now correctly indicates that it "Plots the customer decision hierarchy dendrogram." This improves clarity regarding the purpose of the method and the output produced.

Copy link
Contributor

@mvanwyk mvanwyk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@mayurkmmt mayurkmmt merged commit 49a04c0 into main Apr 8, 2025
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants