Skip to content

Try to fix GAT example by split utility dependency for SimpleGraph and SimpleWeightedGraphs #45

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 24, 2020

Conversation

ilancoulon
Copy link
Contributor

Tackling #43 with this PR.

I split the graph/utils.jl function into simplegraphs.jl and weightedgraphs.jl. It was needed because utils.jl was included only when SimpleWeightedGraphs was present.

@ilancoulon ilancoulon mentioned this pull request Jun 16, 2020
ilancoulon and others added 2 commits June 21, 2020 00:51
@yuehhua yuehhua force-pushed the ic/fix-gat-example branch from 6390709 to 08a3f04 Compare June 20, 2020 16:59
@yuehhua
Copy link
Member

yuehhua commented Jun 21, 2020

@ilancoulon Could you please check that again if it is good to merge?

@ilancoulon
Copy link
Contributor Author

@yuehhua Seems good for me!

@yuehhua yuehhua changed the title Fixing GAT example Try to fix GAT example by split utility dependency for SimpleGraph and SimpleWeightedGraphs Jun 24, 2020
@yuehhua yuehhua merged commit 0916223 into FluxML:master Jun 24, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants