Skip to content

refactor: remove cluster id#220

Merged
MichaelScofield merged 1 commit intomainfrom
refactor/remove-cluster-id
Mar 4, 2025
Merged

refactor: remove cluster id#220
MichaelScofield merged 1 commit intomainfrom
refactor/remove-cluster-id

Conversation

@v0y4g3r
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@v0y4g3r v0y4g3r commented Feb 27, 2025

I hereby agree to the terms of the GreptimeDB CLA.

Refer to a related PR or issue link (optional)

What's changed and what's your intention?

Remove cluster_id Field from Protocol Buffers

  • Removed cluster_id Field: The cluster_id field has been removed from the RequestHeader and ResponseHeader messages across multiple langua bindings and source files. This includes updates to:
    • C++: common.pb.cc, common.pb.h
    • Go: common.pb.go
    • Java: Common.java
    • Proto: common.proto
    • Rust: meta.rs

Checklist

  • I have written the necessary comments.
  • I have added the necessary unit tests and integration tests.

 ### Remove `cluster_id` Field from Protocol Buffers

 - **Removed `cluster_id` Field**: The `cluster_id` field has been removed from the `RequestHeader` and `ResponseHeader` messages across multiple langua
 bindings and source files. This includes updates to:
   - C++: `common.pb.cc`, `common.pb.h`
   - Go: `common.pb.go`
   - Java: `Common.java`
   - Proto: `common.proto`
   - Rust: `meta.rs`

 These changes streamline the protocol by eliminating the `cluster_id` field, simplifying the message structures and related logic.
@v0y4g3r v0y4g3r requested review from WenyXu and fengjiachun and removed request for fengjiachun February 28, 2025 02:26
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@fengjiachun fengjiachun left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@MichaelScofield MichaelScofield merged commit d92c9ac into main Mar 4, 2025
@MichaelScofield MichaelScofield deleted the refactor/remove-cluster-id branch March 4, 2025 03:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants