Skip to content

feat!: use indirect indices for bloom filter to reduce size#5377

Merged
zhongzc merged 7 commits intoGreptimeTeam:mainfrom
zhongzc:zhongzc/bloom-filter-indices-format
Jan 16, 2025
Merged

feat!: use indirect indices for bloom filter to reduce size#5377
zhongzc merged 7 commits intoGreptimeTeam:mainfrom
zhongzc:zhongzc/bloom-filter-indices-format

Conversation

@zhongzc
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@zhongzc zhongzc commented Jan 16, 2025

I hereby agree to the terms of the GreptimeDB CLA.

Refer to a related PR or issue link (optional)

Wait for GreptimeTeam/greptime-proto#210

What's changed and what's your intention?

Add indirect indices for bloom filter.

E.g. for bloom filters like:

[ same content ][ same content ][ same content ][ other content ]

change to:

[0, 0, 0, 1]
 |  |  |  `------.
 |  |  |         |
 v  v  v         v
[ same content ][ other content ]
  • applier can also benefit from this and reduce unnecessary repeated searches.
  • protobuf as metadata of bloom filter to further cut the size.

PR Checklist

Please convert it to a draft if some of the following conditions are not met.

  • I have written the necessary rustdoc comments.
  • I have added the necessary unit tests and integration tests.
  • This PR requires documentation updates.
  • API changes are backward compatible.
  • Schema or data changes are backward compatible.

Signed-off-by: Zhenchi <zhongzc_arch@outlook.com>
@zhongzc zhongzc requested review from a team, evenyag, v0y4g3r and waynexia as code owners January 16, 2025 07:25
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai Bot commented Jan 16, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on this repository.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the docs-not-required This change does not impact docs. label Jan 16, 2025
@zhongzc zhongzc requested review from WenyXu and removed request for a team, evenyag, v0y4g3r and waynexia January 16, 2025 07:25
@zhongzc zhongzc changed the title feat!(bloom-filter): use indirect indices to reduce size feat!: use indirect indices for bloom filter to reduce size Jan 16, 2025
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the breaking-change This pull request contains breaking changes. label Jan 16, 2025
Signed-off-by: Zhenchi <zhongzc_arch@outlook.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhenchi <zhongzc_arch@outlook.com>
@zhongzc zhongzc requested a review from waynexia January 16, 2025 07:52
Signed-off-by: Zhenchi <zhongzc_arch@outlook.com>
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot reviewed 6 out of 11 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

Files not reviewed (5)
  • src/index/src/bloom_filter/creator/finalize_segment.rs: Evaluated as low risk
  • src/mito2/src/cache/index/bloom_filter_index.rs: Evaluated as low risk
  • src/mito2/src/sst/index/bloom_filter/creator.rs: Evaluated as low risk
  • src/index/Cargo.toml: Evaluated as low risk
  • src/index/src/bloom_filter.rs: Evaluated as low risk
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (2)

src/index/src/bloom_filter/creator.rs:175

  • [nitpick] The variable name 'elem_count' should be renamed to 'element_count' for consistency.
rows_per_segment: self.rows_per_segment as _,

src/index/src/bloom_filter/error.rs:35

  • The error message for DecodeProto should be more descriptive. Consider including additional context about the decoding failure.
DecodeProto {

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@waynexia waynexia left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd like a DROP INDEX for easy upgrade, or keep one more version for compatible....

@WenyXu
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

WenyXu commented Jan 16, 2025

Wait for GreptimeTeam/greptime-proto#210

Signed-off-by: Zhenchi <zhongzc_arch@outlook.com>
@zhongzc zhongzc enabled auto-merge January 16, 2025 13:04
@zhongzc zhongzc added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 16, 2025
Merged via the queue into GreptimeTeam:main with commit 1acfb6e Jan 16, 2025
@zhongzc zhongzc deleted the zhongzc/bloom-filter-indices-format branch January 16, 2025 13:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

breaking-change This pull request contains breaking changes. docs-not-required This change does not impact docs.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants