docs: create 5 priority GitHub issues for ISMS compliance gaps

[Copilot]

Pull Request Description

Created 5 GitHub issues addressing critical documentation gaps identified in Hack23 ISMS Secure Development Policy audit. Issues prioritize quality, architecture transparency, and security evidence documentation required for v1.0 release.

Issues Created:

• 📋 Create WORKFLOWS.md Documentation for CI/CD Pipeline Transparency #584 (High/Medium): WORKFLOWS.md - CI/CD pipeline documentation (mandatory per §10.1)
• 📊 Add Public Test Coverage Badges to README.md #585 (High/Small): Coverage badges - Public test evidence (current: 75.06% statements, 64.9% branches)
• 🧪 Create E2ETestPlan.md Documentation for End-to-End Testing Strategy #586 (High/Medium): E2ETestPlan.md - End-to-end testing strategy (mandatory per §4.2)
• 🛡️ Enhance SECURITY_ARCHITECTURE.md with Evidence Badges #587 (Medium/Small): Security architecture badges - OpenSSF, SLSA, SonarCloud, FOSSA evidence
• ⚡ Create performance-testing.md Documentation for Performance Validation #588 (Medium/Medium): performance-testing.md - Lighthouse benchmarks and performance budgets

All issues include measured metrics, implementation guidance, ISMS policy references, and compliance framework mappings (ISO 27001, NIST CSF, CIS Controls).

Type of Change

• 📝 Documentation

Component(s) Modified

• App Core
• Dashboard
• Radar Chart
• Security Level Widget
• Business Impact Analysis Widget
• Compliance Status Widget
• Cost Estimation Widget
• Security Summary Widget
• Value Creation Widget
• Constants / Data Model
• Hooks

CIA Impact Area

• Confidentiality
• Integrity
• Availability

Security Level Impact

• Basic
• Moderate
• High
• Very High

Test Coverage Impact

• My changes affect low-coverage areas (SecurityLevelWidget, RadarChart, CostEstimation, useCIAOptions)
• I've added tests to improve coverage
• N/A - Only modifying high-coverage areas

Testing Performed

• Manual testing completed
• Security validation performed

Screenshots/Examples

Created Issues:

Issue #584: WORKFLOWS.md (High/Medium, ISO 27001 A.12.1)
Issue #585: Coverage Badges (High/Small, 64.9% < 70% target)
Issue #586: E2ETestPlan.md (High/Medium, NIST CSF PR.IP-1)
Issue #587: Security Badges (Medium/Small, CIS Controls 1.1)
Issue #588: performance-testing.md (Medium/Medium, ISO 27001 A.8.32)

Coverage Metrics (Measured):

• Statements: 75.06% (target: 80%+)
• Branches: 64.9% (target: 70%+) ⚠️
• Functions: 80% ✅
• Lines: 75.78% (target: 80%+)

Related Issues

Addresses ISMS compliance requirements. Created issues #584, #585, #586, #587, #588.

Checklist

• My PR title follows the conventional commit format (e.g., feat: add new feature)
• Code follows project coding standards
• Tests are passing
• Documentation has been updated (if applicable)
• Security compliance is maintained or improved
• Changes have been reviewed for performance impact
• Breaking changes are documented (if any)

Additional Notes

ISMS Policy Gaps Identified:

• Missing mandatory docs: WORKFLOWS.md, E2ETestPlan.md, performance-testing.md
• Branch coverage below 70% threshold (64.9%)
• Security architecture missing evidence badges
• No public test coverage badges

Methodology:

1. Downloaded Hack23 ISMS Secure_Development_Policy.md
2. Analyzed repository against policy requirements (§4.1, §4.2, §8, §9, §10.1)
3. Measured current metrics from actual code (coverage reports, workflows)
4. Created issues via GitHub API with proper labels and compliance references
5. Verified no duplicates, all issues immediately visible

Next Steps: Address high-priority issues (#584, #585, #586) first for v1.0 release compliance.

Original prompt

Create top 5 priority issues wirg focus on improving quality and archecture and security documentation aligned with hack23 ISMS

Custom agent used: hack23-task-agent
Expert in repository analysis and task decomposition, creating prioritized, small, mergeable GitHub issues from architecture, code, and documentation analysis

---

💡 You can make Copilot smarter by setting up custom instructions, customizing its development environment and configuring Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers. Learn more Copilot coding agent tips in the docs.

[github-actions]

Dependency Review

✅ No vulnerabilities or license issues or OpenSSF Scorecard issues found.

Scanned Files

None