Skip to content

ScheduledMerges: make the size ratio configurable #717

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 21, 2025

Conversation

jorisdral
Copy link
Collaborator

@jorisdral jorisdral commented May 8, 2025

It's probably also a prerequisite to prototype the merge schedule with size ratios other than 4 before we can be confident that we can make it configurable in the real implementation too.

At that point, we'd need to configure the size ratio in the ScheduledMerges prototype if we want to compare traces for the prototype and real implementation (see #445).

This PR builds on top of #716 to reduce the number of merge conflicts

@jorisdral jorisdral self-assigned this May 8, 2025
@jorisdral jorisdral force-pushed the jdral/prototypes-configurable-writebuffersize branch from 8c8c7ee to ffc0607 Compare May 8, 2025 15:23
@jorisdral jorisdral force-pushed the jdral/prototypes-configurable-sizeratio branch from bb3a72e to d685bcc Compare May 8, 2025 15:25
@jorisdral jorisdral force-pushed the jdral/prototypes-configurable-writebuffersize branch 2 times, most recently from 5244165 to 32aa054 Compare May 13, 2025 11:47
@jorisdral jorisdral force-pushed the jdral/prototypes-configurable-sizeratio branch from d685bcc to a4063c0 Compare May 13, 2025 11:52
@jorisdral jorisdral marked this pull request as ready for review May 13, 2025 11:52
@jorisdral jorisdral force-pushed the jdral/prototypes-configurable-sizeratio branch from a4063c0 to 00b9aec Compare May 13, 2025 11:54
@jorisdral
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I've put the PR back into draft mode because I found a bug

@jorisdral jorisdral marked this pull request as draft May 14, 2025 14:18
@jorisdral jorisdral force-pushed the jdral/prototypes-configurable-writebuffersize branch 4 times, most recently from 2b67d45 to 44a8197 Compare May 15, 2025 15:08
@jorisdral jorisdral force-pushed the jdral/prototypes-configurable-sizeratio branch from 00b9aec to beb5afe Compare May 15, 2025 15:27
@jorisdral
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Ready for review again!

@jorisdral jorisdral marked this pull request as ready for review May 15, 2025 15:40
@jorisdral jorisdral force-pushed the jdral/prototypes-configurable-writebuffersize branch from 44a8197 to ad1e471 Compare May 15, 2025 15:46
@jorisdral jorisdral force-pushed the jdral/prototypes-configurable-sizeratio branch from beb5afe to 9dde4c3 Compare May 15, 2025 15:49
Copy link
Collaborator

@dcoutts dcoutts left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good!

@jorisdral jorisdral force-pushed the jdral/prototypes-configurable-writebuffersize branch from ad1e471 to 18063cb Compare May 21, 2025 11:24
@jorisdral jorisdral force-pushed the jdral/prototypes-configurable-sizeratio branch from 9dde4c3 to c3bf08d Compare May 21, 2025 11:28
@jorisdral jorisdral force-pushed the jdral/prototypes-configurable-writebuffersize branch from 18063cb to c0e13ef Compare May 21, 2025 13:14
@jorisdral jorisdral force-pushed the jdral/prototypes-configurable-sizeratio branch from c3bf08d to 1f5611d Compare May 21, 2025 13:55
Base automatically changed from jdral/prototypes-configurable-writebuffersize to main May 21, 2025 14:27
@jorisdral jorisdral added this pull request to the merge queue May 21, 2025
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks May 21, 2025
@dcoutts dcoutts added this pull request to the merge queue May 21, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit 1bf5f11 May 21, 2025
28 checks passed
@dcoutts dcoutts deleted the jdral/prototypes-configurable-sizeratio branch May 21, 2025 15:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants