Skip to content

check for exact coefficients; close #600 #601

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Mar 3, 2025

Conversation

jverzani
Copy link
Member

@jverzani jverzani commented Mar 1, 2025

Closes #600 by avoiding a call to isapprox when coefficients are exact.

(This might be needed elsewhere; in which case abstracting the test hasmethod(eps, T) would be useful.)

Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 1, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 76.32%. Comparing base (12c11ef) to head (2ecbdbf).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #601      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   76.30%   76.32%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          38       38              
  Lines        4068     4071       +3     
==========================================
+ Hits         3104     3107       +3     
  Misses        964      964              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@jverzani jverzani merged commit 1a20574 into JuliaMath:master Mar 3, 2025
21 of 24 checks passed
@jverzani jverzani deleted the issue_600 branch March 3, 2025 14:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Incorrect/unnecessary conversion to real in polynomial division and remainder
1 participant