Merge Development to Master - For work on documentation

[DocSvartz]

Sync development and master so you can work on new documentation

[DocSvartz]

@andrerav @stagep @DevTKSS I suggest synchronizing the branches at this stage so we can start working on the documentation independently of the code. What do you think about this?

[stagep]

@andrerav @stagep @DevTKSS I suggest synchronizing the branches at this stage so we can start working on the documentation independently of the code. What do you think about this?

Agree

[andrerav]

@andrerav @stagep @DevTKSS I suggest synchronizing the branches at this stage so we can start working on the documentation independently of the code. What do you think about this?

Sounds good to me :)

[DocSvartz]

On the second try the site seemed to launch. 😅

@DevTKSS I'm not sure this is the correct setting. But it was originally configured for the gh-pages branch, and publishing failed. 🤔

[DevTKSS]

@DocSvartz I could send you a screenshot of my settings in my Samples Repo. Do you still need this or did it work now? I am not at my computer right now

The CI file and docfx.json is already public available in there

https://github.com/DevTKSS/DevTKSS.Uno.SampleApps/blob/master/.github%2Fworkflows%2Fbuild-deploy-docs.yml

Did just recently push some new docs releases, which worked fluentles 👍 just mine includes metadata with filterconfig.yml because I don't want the generated Mvux API of my app to be provided there, just because it's ridiculous to assume or expect externals to make calls to generated VM code 🤣 or Uno own API like the Resizetizer 😅 that's where you will find differences to Mapster's version now

[DocSvartz]

I don't know, but it seems to have already worked.

https://mapstermapper.github.io/Mapster/ is active
And it's published in the same way as your Samples Repo docs to special github Environment.

[DocSvartz]

Actually, I wanted to know if you have the same publishing setting set up in your Samples Repo?
If not, then two things remain unclear:

1. Was it the workflow you added that triggered it, or something else?
2. Will the site automatically rebuild after changes to the master branch?
   😅🤔

[DevTKSS]

@DocSvartz GitHub does always take some time between pages deployment and the actual update of the page we can explore. Most likely you have been to quick for GitHub possibly?👍

[DocSvartz]

No, initially, the site build didn't work.
After changing the settings to those shown in the image and manually restarting the build process, the site was built and working.

[DevTKSS]

@DocSvartz yes, I would say, looks same like I have:

I am still curious how to improve my knowledge about the environments thing, but the github docs did not really made it better. Maybe some day I will find someone who knows about this and can ask this one 👍

[DocSvartz]

Ok. That's what I wanted to know. 👍