Skip to content

feat(cli): 增加私有化模板不展示的逻辑#16152

Merged
koppthe merged 1 commit intomainfrom
feat/cli-private-templates
Jul 24, 2024
Merged

feat(cli): 增加私有化模板不展示的逻辑#16152
koppthe merged 1 commit intomainfrom
feat/cli-private-templates

Conversation

@koppthe
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@koppthe koppthe commented Jul 24, 2024

这个 PR 做了什么? (简要描述所做更改)

增加私有化模板不在 CLI 展示的逻辑,同时也可以用于暂时下架模板的功能

这个 PR 是什么类型? (至少选择一个)

  • 错误修复(Bugfix) issue: fix #
  • 新功能(Feature)
  • 代码重构(Refactor)
  • TypeScript 类型定义修改(Typings)
  • 文档修改(Docs)
  • 代码风格更新(Code style update)
  • 其他,请描述(Other, please describe):

这个 PR 涉及以下平台:

  • 所有小程序
  • 微信小程序
  • 支付宝小程序
  • 百度小程序
  • 字节跳动小程序
  • QQ 轻应用
  • 京东小程序
  • 快应用平台(QuickApp)
  • Web 平台(H5)
  • 移动端(React-Native)
  • 鸿蒙(harmony)

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented Jul 24, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 61.05%. Comparing base (7c48afd) to head (d2abcba).

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main   #16152   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   61.05%   61.05%           
=======================================
  Files         445      445           
  Lines       22939    22939           
  Branches     5022     5022           
=======================================
  Hits        14005    14005           
  Misses       7957     7957           
  Partials      977      977           
Flag Coverage Δ
taro-cli 73.67% <ø> (ø)
taro-runtime 59.83% <ø> (ø)
taro-web 52.76% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

@koppthe koppthe merged commit da11bdd into main Jul 24, 2024
@koppthe koppthe deleted the feat/cli-private-templates branch July 24, 2024 07:24
This was referenced Jul 27, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants