Skip to content

feat: 为jd小程序平台补充 editor 组件#16166

Merged
ZEJIA-LIU merged 1 commit intomainfrom
feat/jd-mini-editor
Jul 26, 2024
Merged

feat: 为jd小程序平台补充 editor 组件#16166
ZEJIA-LIU merged 1 commit intomainfrom
feat/jd-mini-editor

Conversation

@ZEJIA-LIU
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

这个 PR 做了什么? (简要描述所做更改)
为jd小程序平台补充 editor 组件

这个 PR 是什么类型? (至少选择一个)

  • 错误修复(Bugfix) issue: fix #
  • 新功能(Feature)
  • 代码重构(Refactor)
  • TypeScript 类型定义修改(Typings)
  • 文档修改(Docs)
  • 代码风格更新(Code style update)
  • 其他,请描述(Other, please describe):

这个 PR 涉及以下平台:

  • 所有小程序
  • 微信小程序
  • 支付宝小程序
  • 百度小程序
  • 字节跳动小程序
  • QQ 轻应用
  • 京东小程序
  • 快应用平台(QuickApp)
  • Web 平台(H5)
  • 移动端(React-Native)
  • 鸿蒙(harmony)

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented Jul 26, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 61.06%. Comparing base (ea3bd24) to head (2abcc6a).

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main   #16166   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   61.06%   61.06%           
=======================================
  Files         445      445           
  Lines       22943    22943           
  Branches     5021     5021           
=======================================
  Hits        14009    14009           
  Misses       7957     7957           
  Partials      977      977           
Flag Coverage Δ
taro-cli 73.67% <ø> (ø)
taro-runtime 59.93% <ø> (ø)
taro-web 52.76% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

@ZEJIA-LIU ZEJIA-LIU requested a review from koppthe July 26, 2024 09:40
@ZEJIA-LIU ZEJIA-LIU merged commit 3ffe3b8 into main Jul 26, 2024
@ZEJIA-LIU ZEJIA-LIU deleted the feat/jd-mini-editor branch July 26, 2024 10:12
This was referenced Jul 27, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants