Skip to content

Several small amendments to initial overlay spec version #3

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jul 31, 2021

Conversation

MikeRalphson
Copy link
Member

@MikeRalphson MikeRalphson commented Jul 5, 2021

Signed-off-by: Mike Ralphson [email protected]

I've also put up a respec-rendered version of the spec here just so we can see what needs changing in the generation script (e.g. references to OAS etc).

Copy link
Member

@webron webron left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Changes look good, and there's no need to wait for the weekly call to merge them (it's not the core spec nor a published one).

Added a couple of comments.

The only thing I'm unsure about is the extensions - that's something we have not discussed whether we want to include in the Overlay spec, which is why I kept the content of the extension, but triple starred it (***) - it wasn't meant to be bold.


Field Pattern | Type | Description
---|:---:|---
<a name="infoExtensions"></a>^x- | Any | Allows extensions to the OpenAPI Schema. The field name MUST begin with `x-`, for example, `x-internal-id`. Field names beginning `x-oai-` and `x-oas-` are reserved for uses defined by the [OpenAPI Initiative](https://www.openapis.org/). The value can be `null`, a primitive, an array or an object.
<a name="overlayExtensions"></a>^x- | Any | Allows extensions to the Overlay Specification. The field name MUST begin with `x-`, for example, `x-internal-id`. Field names beginning `x-oai-` and `x-oas-` are reserved for uses defined by the [OpenAPI Initiative](https://www.openapis.org/). The value MAY be `null`, a primitive, an array or an object.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This actually means there's a good chance there's an error in the OAS anchor for ^x-.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh, I see what you mean - will check.

Assuming that one TSC is going to serve for both specs for the moment
This will also help production of the ReSpec version of the spec
@darrelmiller darrelmiller merged commit cd91d98 into OAI:main Jul 31, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants