-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 21
Several small amendments to initial overlay spec version #3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Mike Ralphson <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Ron <[email protected]>
This will help the respec rendering
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Changes look good, and there's no need to wait for the weekly call to merge them (it's not the core spec nor a published one).
Added a couple of comments.
The only thing I'm unsure about is the extensions - that's something we have not discussed whether we want to include in the Overlay spec, which is why I kept the content of the extension, but triple starred it (***) - it wasn't meant to be bold.
|
||
Field Pattern | Type | Description | ||
---|:---:|--- | ||
<a name="infoExtensions"></a>^x- | Any | Allows extensions to the OpenAPI Schema. The field name MUST begin with `x-`, for example, `x-internal-id`. Field names beginning `x-oai-` and `x-oas-` are reserved for uses defined by the [OpenAPI Initiative](https://www.openapis.org/). The value can be `null`, a primitive, an array or an object. | ||
<a name="overlayExtensions"></a>^x- | Any | Allows extensions to the Overlay Specification. The field name MUST begin with `x-`, for example, `x-internal-id`. Field names beginning `x-oai-` and `x-oas-` are reserved for uses defined by the [OpenAPI Initiative](https://www.openapis.org/). The value MAY be `null`, a primitive, an array or an object. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This actually means there's a good chance there's an error in the OAS anchor for ^x-
.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh, I see what you mean - will check.
Assuming that one TSC is going to serve for both specs for the moment This will also help production of the ReSpec version of the spec
Signed-off-by: Mike Ralphson [email protected]
I've also put up a respec-rendered version of the spec here just so we can see what needs changing in the generation script (e.g. references to OAS etc).