Skip to content

Drop support for releasing via PEAR #4

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 8, 2023
Merged

Conversation

jrfnl
Copy link
Member

@jrfnl jrfnl commented Nov 8, 2023

Description

PEAR is barely used anymore and registering this fork as a new package on PEAR does not seem worth the effort considering that PEAR install support was going to be dropped in 4.0 anyway.

This means that new releases will no longer be available via PEAR.

Installing via Composer, PHIVE, PHAR download and git clones will still be supported.

Suggested changelog entry

New releases will no longer be available via PEAR. Note: this doesn't affect the PEAR sniffs.

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
    • This change is only breaking for integrators, not for external standards or end-users.
  • Documentation improvement

PEAR is barely used anymore and registering this fork as a new package on PEAR does not seem worth the effort considering that PEAR install support was going to be dropped in 4.0 anyway.

This means that new releases will no longer be available via PEAR.

Installing via Composer, PHIVE, PHAR download and git clones will still be supported.
@jrfnl jrfnl added this to the 3.8.0 milestone Nov 8, 2023
@jrfnl jrfnl merged commit 763eca5 into master Nov 8, 2023
@jrfnl jrfnl deleted the feature/drop-pear-support branch November 8, 2023 04:42
jrfnl added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 8, 2023
@jrfnl jrfnl mentioned this pull request Nov 8, 2023
jrfnl added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 9, 2023
jrfnl added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 17, 2024
Follow up after #4 and #39

The alternative path referred to in the bin scripts and the test bootstrap was specific for running via a PEAR install. This should no longer be needed (nor will this work).
jrfnl added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 18, 2024
Follow up after #4 and #39

The alternative path referred to in the bin scripts and the test bootstrap was specific for running via a PEAR install. This should no longer be needed (nor will this work).
jrfnl added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 18, 2024
Follow up after #4 and #39

The alternative path referred to in the bin scripts and the test bootstrap was specific for running via a PEAR install. This should no longer be needed (nor will this work).
jrfnl added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 23, 2025
This adds another set of dedicated tests to safeguard how XML docs which don't follow the specification are handled.

This initial set of tests for this documents the current behaviour [*]. This behaviour may not always be the desired behaviour, in which case, this will be fixed in follow-up commits.

To get these tests up and running, the following fatal errors needed to be fixed:

* Fatal error when a code comparison only contains a single code element:
    ```
    Fatal error: Uncaught Error: Call to a member function getAttribute() on null in path/to/PHP_CodeSniffer/src/Generators/Markdown.php:253
    Stack trace:
    #0 path/to/PHP_CodeSniffer/src/Generators/Markdown.php(139): PHP_CodeSniffer\Generators\Markdown->getFormattedCodeComparisonBlock(Object(DOMElement))
    #1 path/to/PHP_CodeSniffer/src/Generators/Markdown.php(39): PHP_CodeSniffer\Generators\Markdown->processSniff(Object(DOMElement))
    #2 path/to/PHP_CodeSniffer/src/Runner.php(99): PHP_CodeSniffer\Generators\Markdown->generate()
    #3 path/to/PHP_CodeSniffer/bin/phpcs(14): PHP_CodeSniffer\Runner->runPHPCS()
    #4 {main}
      thrown in path/to/PHP_CodeSniffer/src/Generators/Markdown.php on line 253
    ```

* Fatal error when a code element contains no textual content:
    ```
    Fatal error: Uncaught Error: Call to a member function getAttribute() on null in path/to/PHP_CodeSniffer/src/Generators/Markdown.php:246
    Stack trace:
    #0 path/to/PHP_CodeSniffer/src/Generators/Markdown.php(139): PHP_CodeSniffer\Generators\Markdown->getFormattedCodeComparisonBlock(Object(DOMElement))
    #1 path/to/PHP_CodeSniffer/src/Generators/Markdown.php(39): PHP_CodeSniffer\Generators\Markdown->processSniff(Object(DOMElement))
    #2 path/to/PHP_CodeSniffer/src/Runner.php(99): PHP_CodeSniffer\Generators\Markdown->generate()
    #3 path/to/PHP_CodeSniffer/bin/phpcs(14): PHP_CodeSniffer\Runner->runPHPCS()
    #4 {main}
      thrown in path/to/PHP_CodeSniffer/src/Generators/Markdown.php on line 246
    ```

Both of these fatals are fixed by adding defensive coding validating that there are (at least) two code blocks to the `getFormattedCodeComparisonBlock()` methods for all three generator classes.
jrfnl added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 14, 2025
This adds another set of dedicated tests to safeguard how XML docs which don't follow the specification are handled.

This initial set of tests for this documents the current behaviour [*]. This behaviour may not always be the desired behaviour, in which case, this will be fixed in follow-up commits.

To get these tests up and running, the following fatal errors needed to be fixed:

* Fatal error when a code comparison only contains a single code element:
    ```
    Fatal error: Uncaught Error: Call to a member function getAttribute() on null in path/to/PHP_CodeSniffer/src/Generators/Markdown.php:253
    Stack trace:
    #0 path/to/PHP_CodeSniffer/src/Generators/Markdown.php(139): PHP_CodeSniffer\Generators\Markdown->getFormattedCodeComparisonBlock(Object(DOMElement))
    #1 path/to/PHP_CodeSniffer/src/Generators/Markdown.php(39): PHP_CodeSniffer\Generators\Markdown->processSniff(Object(DOMElement))
    #2 path/to/PHP_CodeSniffer/src/Runner.php(99): PHP_CodeSniffer\Generators\Markdown->generate()
    #3 path/to/PHP_CodeSniffer/bin/phpcs(14): PHP_CodeSniffer\Runner->runPHPCS()
    #4 {main}
      thrown in path/to/PHP_CodeSniffer/src/Generators/Markdown.php on line 253
    ```

* Fatal error when a code element contains no textual content:
    ```
    Fatal error: Uncaught Error: Call to a member function getAttribute() on null in path/to/PHP_CodeSniffer/src/Generators/Markdown.php:246
    Stack trace:
    #0 path/to/PHP_CodeSniffer/src/Generators/Markdown.php(139): PHP_CodeSniffer\Generators\Markdown->getFormattedCodeComparisonBlock(Object(DOMElement))
    #1 path/to/PHP_CodeSniffer/src/Generators/Markdown.php(39): PHP_CodeSniffer\Generators\Markdown->processSniff(Object(DOMElement))
    #2 path/to/PHP_CodeSniffer/src/Runner.php(99): PHP_CodeSniffer\Generators\Markdown->generate()
    #3 path/to/PHP_CodeSniffer/bin/phpcs(14): PHP_CodeSniffer\Runner->runPHPCS()
    #4 {main}
      thrown in path/to/PHP_CodeSniffer/src/Generators/Markdown.php on line 246
    ```

Both of these fatals are fixed by adding defensive coding validating that there are (at least) two code blocks to the `getFormattedCodeComparisonBlock()` methods for all three generator classes.
jrfnl added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 14, 2025
This adds another set of dedicated tests to safeguard how XML docs which don't follow the specification are handled.

This initial set of tests for this documents the current behaviour [*]. This behaviour may not always be the desired behaviour, in which case, this will be fixed in follow-up commits.

To get these tests up and running, the following fatal errors needed to be fixed:

* Fatal error when a code comparison only contains a single code element:
    ```
    Fatal error: Uncaught Error: Call to a member function getAttribute() on null in path/to/PHP_CodeSniffer/src/Generators/Markdown.php:253
    Stack trace:
    #0 path/to/PHP_CodeSniffer/src/Generators/Markdown.php(139): PHP_CodeSniffer\Generators\Markdown->getFormattedCodeComparisonBlock(Object(DOMElement))
    #1 path/to/PHP_CodeSniffer/src/Generators/Markdown.php(39): PHP_CodeSniffer\Generators\Markdown->processSniff(Object(DOMElement))
    #2 path/to/PHP_CodeSniffer/src/Runner.php(99): PHP_CodeSniffer\Generators\Markdown->generate()
    #3 path/to/PHP_CodeSniffer/bin/phpcs(14): PHP_CodeSniffer\Runner->runPHPCS()
    #4 {main}
      thrown in path/to/PHP_CodeSniffer/src/Generators/Markdown.php on line 253
    ```

* Fatal error when a code element contains no textual content:
    ```
    Fatal error: Uncaught Error: Call to a member function getAttribute() on null in path/to/PHP_CodeSniffer/src/Generators/Markdown.php:246
    Stack trace:
    #0 path/to/PHP_CodeSniffer/src/Generators/Markdown.php(139): PHP_CodeSniffer\Generators\Markdown->getFormattedCodeComparisonBlock(Object(DOMElement))
    #1 path/to/PHP_CodeSniffer/src/Generators/Markdown.php(39): PHP_CodeSniffer\Generators\Markdown->processSniff(Object(DOMElement))
    #2 path/to/PHP_CodeSniffer/src/Runner.php(99): PHP_CodeSniffer\Generators\Markdown->generate()
    #3 path/to/PHP_CodeSniffer/bin/phpcs(14): PHP_CodeSniffer\Runner->runPHPCS()
    #4 {main}
      thrown in path/to/PHP_CodeSniffer/src/Generators/Markdown.php on line 246
    ```

Both of these fatals are fixed by adding defensive coding validating that there are (at least) two code blocks to the `getFormattedCodeComparisonBlock()` methods for all three generator classes.
jrfnl added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 10, 2025
This fixes the following fatal error which would occur if the `Diff` report is used in combination with caching:
```
Fatal error: Uncaught Error: Call to a member function getFixableCount() on null in path/to/PHP_CodeSniffer/src/Fixer.php:144
Stack trace:
#0 path/to/PHP_CodeSniffer/src/Reports/Diff.php(73): PHP_CodeSniffer\Fixer->fixFile()
#1 path/to/PHP_CodeSniffer/src/Reporter.php(285): PHP_CodeSniffer\Reports\Diff->generateFileReport(Array, Object(PHP_CodeSniffer\Files\LocalFile), true, 150)
#2 path/to/PHP_CodeSniffer/src/Runner.php(659): PHP_CodeSniffer\Reporter->cacheFileReport(Object(PHP_CodeSniffer\Files\LocalFile))
#3 path/to/PHP_CodeSniffer/src/Runner.php(400): PHP_CodeSniffer\Runner->processFile(Object(PHP_CodeSniffer\Files\LocalFile))
#4 path/to/PHP_CodeSniffer/src/Runner.php(119): PHP_CodeSniffer\Runner->run()
#5 path/to/PHP_CodeSniffer/bin/phpcs(30): PHP_CodeSniffer\Runner->runPHPCS()
#6 {main}
  thrown in path/to/PHP_CodeSniffer/src/Fixer.php on line 144
```
jrfnl added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 10, 2025
…report

Okay, so this is an awkward one.

If both the `Code` + the `Diff` report were requested + caching was turned on + the _order_ of the requested reports was `Code,Diff` (i.e. first the code report), the following fatal error which would occur:
```
Fatal error: Uncaught Error: Call to a member function getFixableCount() on null in path/to/PHP_CodeSniffer/src/Fixer.php:144
Stack trace:
#0 path/to/PHP_CodeSniffer/src/Reports/Diff.php(73): PHP_CodeSniffer\Fixer->fixFile()
#1 path/to/PHP_CodeSniffer/src/Reporter.php(285): PHP_CodeSniffer\Reports\Diff->generateFileReport(Array, Object(PHP_CodeSniffer\Files\LocalFile), true, 150)
#2 path/to/PHP_CodeSniffer/src/Runner.php(659): PHP_CodeSniffer\Reporter->cacheFileReport(Object(PHP_CodeSniffer\Files\LocalFile))
#3 path/to/PHP_CodeSniffer/src/Runner.php(400): PHP_CodeSniffer\Runner->processFile(Object(PHP_CodeSniffer\Files\LocalFile))
#4 path/to/PHP_CodeSniffer/src/Runner.php(119): PHP_CodeSniffer\Runner->run()
#5 path/to/PHP_CodeSniffer/bin/phpcs(30): PHP_CodeSniffer\Runner->runPHPCS()
#6 {main}
  thrown in path/to/PHP_CodeSniffer/src/Fixer.php on line 144
```

To reproduce the issue (on `master`):
1. Create a small test file like:
    ```php
    <?php

    echo 'hello'.callMe( $p );
    ```
2. Run the following command to initialize the cache:
    ```bash
    phpcs -ps ./test.php --standard=PSR2 --report=Code,Diff --cache
    ```
    All should be fine.
3. Now run the same command again and see the fatal error.

Some investigating later, it turns out that both the `Code` report, as well as the `Diff` report, re-parse the current file, with the `Diff` report initializing the fixer once the file has reparsed, but the `Code` report not doing so (as it doesn't need the fixer).
The problem with that is that the `Code` report basically leaves the `Fixer` in an invalid state, leading to the above error.

While it is up for debate whether reports should ever (be allowed to) re-parse files, for now, let's fix the fatal.

Re-evaluating the report setup should definitely be done, but should probably wait until the Reports classes have test coverage.
jrfnl added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 13, 2025
…report

Okay, so this is an awkward one.

If both the `Code` + the `Diff` report were requested + caching was turned on + the _order_ of the requested reports was `Code,Diff` (i.e. first the code report), the following fatal error which would occur:
```
Fatal error: Uncaught Error: Call to a member function getFixableCount() on null in path/to/PHP_CodeSniffer/src/Fixer.php:144
Stack trace:
#0 path/to/PHP_CodeSniffer/src/Reports/Diff.php(73): PHP_CodeSniffer\Fixer->fixFile()
#1 path/to/PHP_CodeSniffer/src/Reporter.php(285): PHP_CodeSniffer\Reports\Diff->generateFileReport(Array, Object(PHP_CodeSniffer\Files\LocalFile), true, 150)
#2 path/to/PHP_CodeSniffer/src/Runner.php(659): PHP_CodeSniffer\Reporter->cacheFileReport(Object(PHP_CodeSniffer\Files\LocalFile))
#3 path/to/PHP_CodeSniffer/src/Runner.php(400): PHP_CodeSniffer\Runner->processFile(Object(PHP_CodeSniffer\Files\LocalFile))
#4 path/to/PHP_CodeSniffer/src/Runner.php(119): PHP_CodeSniffer\Runner->run()
#5 path/to/PHP_CodeSniffer/bin/phpcs(30): PHP_CodeSniffer\Runner->runPHPCS()
#6 {main}
  thrown in path/to/PHP_CodeSniffer/src/Fixer.php on line 144
```

To reproduce the issue (on `master`):
1. Create a small test file like:
    ```php
    <?php

    echo 'hello'.callMe( $p );
    ```
2. Run the following command to initialize the cache:
    ```bash
    phpcs -ps ./test.php --standard=PSR2 --report=Code,Diff --cache
    ```
    All should be fine.
3. Now run the same command again and see the fatal error.

Some investigating later, it turns out that both the `Code` report, as well as the `Diff` report, re-parse the current file, with the `Diff` report initializing the fixer once the file has reparsed, but the `Code` report not doing so (as it doesn't need the fixer).
The problem with that is that the `Code` report basically leaves the `Fixer` in an invalid state, leading to the above error.

While it is up for debate whether reports should ever (be allowed to) re-parse files, for now, let's fix the fatal.

Re-evaluating the report setup should definitely be done, but should probably wait until the Reports classes have test coverage.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant