Refactor src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ActionItemModal/ActionItemModal.tsx

[palisadoes]

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

1. Evaluate this file:

   1. https://github.com/PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin/blob/develop/src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/ActionItemModal/ActionItemModal.tsx

2. Analyze the file for refactoring opportunities to reduce its size to under 600 lines by identifying:

   1. Duplicated code or patterns that could be consolidated
   2. Complex logic that could be extracted into helper functions or custom hooks
   3. UI components that could be split into smaller, reusable sub-components
   4. State management that could be simplified or moved to custom hooks
   5. Validation logic or form handling that could be abstracted
   6. Type definitions or constants that could be moved to separate files

3. Create a series of PRs related to the fixes:

   1. Each PR must cover a main refactoring suggestion

   2. If your proposal suggests splitting the file into multiple files, then each PR must have <= 10 code files to review

   3. The final PR must alter this file to make sure the screen is excluded from the .github/workflows/scripts/countline.py script

      .github/workflows/pull-request.yml
      

   4. The file layouts must be compatible with our reusable components policy:

      • https://docs-admin.talawa.io/docs/developer-resources/reusable-components/

4. Ensure refactoring maintains:

   1. Current functionality and behavior
   2. Type safety
   3. Readability and maintainability

Describe the solution you'd like

• See above

Describe alternatives you've considered

• N/A

Approach to be followed (optional)

• N/A

Additional context

• N/A

[atharvamhaske]

can i work on this issue ?? @palisadoes

[palisadoes]

Hi @palisadoes, I’d like to work on this refactoring issue. I’ll analyze the file and propose a PR plan with incremental refactors as suggested. Please let me know if I can proceed.

@LavanyaKathuria

We will only be assigning issues or merging PRs for persons who have:

1. At least 18 months of verifiable GitHub history
2. Consistent code updates throughout their GitHub life, especially the most recent 12 months.

You can find more details on the rationale here: https://developer.palisadoes.org/docs/contributor-guide/issues#manual-assignments

If you have merged PRs in other open source projects, let us know and post links to them. We will consider those contributions in our evaluation. If you have other relevant, verifiable and sufficient experience let us know too.

We have had a horrible experience in the past year with AI slop, and this is the only way that we have found that works to combat it, though it’s not perfect.

[palisadoes-bot]

❌ @nishantharkut First time contributors cannot use auto assignment. You have not successfully merged code into this repository. Please ask to be assigned instead.

[nishantharkut]

hi @palisadoes, Could I please get assigned to this issue?