Skip to content

Code churn on Master #948

Closed
Closed
@joshwiens

Description

@joshwiens
  • I'm submitting a ...
    [X] question about the decisions made in the repository

@katallaxie

While the enthusiasm is great, just slamming home changes without others having the opportunity to vet those changes kind of defeats the point of community & code review. 30 Commits directly to master, to include those to fix or remove features that shouldn't have landed between 27 Sept & 01 Aug.

It also means that everyone that uses the webpack-starter as a base project has to pick up those changes and merge them into what is usually a modified project, it gets tedious quickly.

I'm suggesting you start delivering changes as complete, tested & vetted sets of work through the standard pull request workflow that everyone else uses thus making the update process less labor intensive and less prone to blowing up peoples forks (which happened to me last week).

Landing your own code is generally frowned upon and for good reason. A second ( or multiple ) sets of eyes is never, ever a bad thing.

screen shot 2016-09-02 at 8 23 50 am

//cc @gdi2290

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions