Implement Service Clause in Sparql Support #943
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…d query with a trailing values clause.
…ed to execute. This now works as well as re-adding prefix and base declerations as needed
…t, to reduce bandwith usage
This was referenced Dec 23, 2021
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This builds on the excellent work by @marqh.
I have tested it and it works for json replies only.
The existing solution binding are concatenated to the query string in an ugly way, but functional.
Would love to know how to do this nicer.
What is the procedure to get this merged?
Should the testcases not depend on dbpedia, but some test server?