-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Fix the password reset logic and error handling #12
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
Razorfang
wants to merge
8
commits into
tuakiri-develop
Choose a base branch
from
vho-fix-branch
base: tuakiri-develop
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
1cc2131
new: Only generate password reset code prior to email being sent
Razorfang 1d122ae
new: only send sms messages for valid phone numbers
Razorfang 96fad3d
new: Remove hyphens from phone numbers during validation
Razorfang cf51c0b
new: Add error handling to all sendResetCodes calls
Razorfang d6e66f4
new: Ignore HEAD requests to obtainsubject to prevent multiple SMS me…
Razorfang 43f6410
fix: Update invalid mobile message
Razorfang 335d62e
new: Allow characters that normally appear in pasted phone numbers bu…
Razorfang 2f2a889
new: Make regex more clear
Razorfang File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I may now be nit-picking, but wondering whether to make diff (and resulting code) smaller by avoiding a new variable and instead of defining newNumber only to be used in one test, you could do:
(Or possibly finding a shorter way to check if it contains any characters other than
0-9+)But this is at code-style level - and also OK to leave as it is.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
newNumberis used later on to assign to the class variable. I think your suggestion means we'd need an extra call likecheckedNumber = checkedNumber.replaceAll...later in the code.