Skip to content

Conversation

@Shane32
Copy link
Owner

@Shane32 Shane32 commented Oct 1, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Added performance benchmarks for PNG byte QR code rendering across multiple QR sizes (small to huge).
    • Includes memory diagnostics to track allocation and performance over time.
    • No impact on runtime behavior or user-facing features.

@Shane32 Shane32 self-assigned this Oct 1, 2025
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 1, 2025

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Adds a new BenchmarkDotNet benchmark class to measure PNG byte QR code rendering by pre-generating QRCodeData samples (small/medium/big) and exposing four benchmark methods calling GetGraphic with different pixel sizes.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary of changes
Benchmarks
QRCoderBenchmarks/PngByteQRCode.cs
Introduces PngByteQRCodeBenchmark with MemoryDiagnoser, prebuilt QRCodeData samples via QRCodeGenerator (ECC L), and four public benchmark methods: Small/Medium/Big (GetGraphic(10)) and Huge (GetGraphic(50)).

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
  autonumber
  participant BDN as BenchmarkDotNet
  participant PB as PngByteQRCodeBenchmark
  participant G as QRCodeGenerator
  participant P as PngByteQRCode

  Note over PB: Construction/Setup
  BDN->>PB: Instantiate benchmark class
  PB->>G: CreateQrCode("small", ECC L)
  PB->>G: CreateQrCode("medium", ECC L)
  PB->>G: CreateQrCode("big", ECC L)
  G-->>PB: QRCodeData instances

  rect rgba(220,240,255,0.6)
  Note over BDN,PB: Benchmark iteration (example: Small)
  BDN->>PB: RenderPngByteQRCodeSmall()
  PB->>P: new PngByteQRCode(smallData)
  P->>P: GetGraphic(10)
  P-->>PB: byte[] PNG
  PB-->>BDN: result
  end

  rect rgba(240,255,220,0.6)
  Note over BDN,PB: Other cases
  BDN->>PB: RenderPngByteQRCodeMedium/Big/Huge()
  PB->>P: new PngByteQRCode(med/big)
  P->>P: GetGraphic(10 or 50)
  P-->>PB: byte[] PNG
  PB-->>BDN: result
  end
Loading

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Docstring Coverage ⚠️ Warning Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. You can run @coderabbitai generate docstrings to improve docstring coverage.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title Check ✅ Passed The title clearly and succinctly summarizes the main change of introducing PNG benchmarks without extraneous detail or vague phrasing, making it immediately understandable to reviewers and maintainers.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch add_png_benchmarks

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ec52e48 and fcaca92.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • QRCoderBenchmarks/PngByteQRCode.cs (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code graph analysis (1)
QRCoderBenchmarks/PngByteQRCode.cs (1)
QRCoder/QRCodeGenerator.cs (1)
  • ECCLevel (266-274)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: build
🔇 Additional comments (5)
QRCoderBenchmarks/PngByteQRCode.cs (5)

11-20: LGTM! Benchmark setup follows best practices.

Pre-generating QRCodeData samples in the constructor ensures the benchmarks measure only rendering performance, not generation time. The sample sizes (small, medium, big) provide good coverage for performance testing.


23-28: LGTM!

The benchmark correctly measures rendering of a small QR code with pixel size 10.


30-35: LGTM!

The benchmark correctly measures rendering of a medium-sized QR code with pixel size 10.


37-42: LGTM!

The benchmark correctly measures rendering of a big QR code with pixel size 10.


44-49: LGTM!

The "Huge" benchmark correctly measures rendering performance with a larger pixel size (50 vs 10), providing insight into how scaling affects performance.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@Shane32 Shane32 requested a review from gfoidl October 1, 2025 22:55
@Shane32 Shane32 merged commit 90df7dd into master Oct 1, 2025
12 checks passed
@Shane32 Shane32 deleted the add_png_benchmarks branch October 1, 2025 23:34
@Shane32 Shane32 added the performance Performance related enhancements or benchmarks label Oct 2, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

performance Performance related enhancements or benchmarks

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants