Skip to content

Create rule S8323: Property names should follow JavaBeans naming conventions #5909

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
github-actions wants to merge 5 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Create rule S8323: Property names should follow JavaBeans naming conventions #5909

github-actions wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot commented Nov 9, 2025

You can preview this rule here (updated a few minutes after each push).

Review

A dedicated reviewer checked the rule description successfully for:

  • logical errors and incorrect information
  • information gaps and missing content
  • text style and tone
  • PR summary and labels follow the guidelines

@github-actions github-actions bot added the groovy label Nov 9, 2025
@denis-troller denis-troller changed the title Create rule S8323 Create rule S8323: Property names should follow JavaBeans naming conventions Nov 9, 2025
@sonarqube-next
Copy link

sonarqube-next bot commented Nov 9, 2025

Quality Gate passed Quality Gate passed for 'rspec-tools'

Issues
0 New issues
0 Fixed issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0 Dependency risks
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarQube

@sonarqube-next
Copy link

sonarqube-next bot commented Nov 9, 2025

Quality Gate passed Quality Gate passed for 'rspec-frontend'

Issues
0 New issues
0 Fixed issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0 Dependency risks
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarQube

@erwan-serandour erwan-serandour self-requested a review December 12, 2025 10:38
erwan-serandour
erwan-serandour approved these changes Dec 12, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@erwan-serandour erwan-serandour left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@erwan-serandour erwan-serandour marked this pull request as ready for review December 12, 2025 14:09
@sonarqube-next
Copy link

sonarqube-next bot commented Dec 12, 2025

Quality Gate passed Quality Gate passed for 'rspec-frontend'

Issues
0 New issues
0 Fixed issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0 Dependency risks
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarQube

@sonarqube-next
Copy link

sonarqube-next bot commented Dec 12, 2025

Quality Gate passed Quality Gate passed for 'rspec-tools'

Issues
0 New issues
0 Fixed issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0 Dependency risks
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarQube

@erwan-serandour erwan-serandour added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 12, 2025
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Dec 12, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@erwan-serandour erwan-serandour erwan-serandour approved these changes

Assignees

@denis-troller denis-troller

Labels

groovy

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@erwan-serandour @denis-troller