fix: correct variable assignment for risk manager

[Laxmi884]

Hi,

I’ve made a change to address an issue where the risk_manager agent was incorrectly assigning the news_report_state instead of the fundamentals_report_state to fundamentals_report during its creation.

File Changed: risk_manager.py (1 line changed)

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @Laxmi884, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses a critical bug within the risk_manager agent's initialization logic. It ensures that the agent correctly receives and processes fundamental analysis data by rectifying a misassigned variable, thereby preventing potential downstream issues related to incorrect financial reporting or decision-making.

Highlights

• Bug Fix: Incorrect Variable Assignment: The risk_manager agent was incorrectly assigning the news_report value to the fundamentals_report variable during its initialization. This has been corrected to assign the proper fundamentals_report value.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request correctly fixes a variable assignment bug in the risk_manager where fundamentals_report was being assigned the wrong state value. However, a high-severity Prompt Injection vulnerability has been identified where the agent constructs an LLM prompt by directly embedding unsanitized data, potentially allowing an attacker to manipulate trading decisions. Additionally, my review suggests improving the robustness of state access to prevent potential runtime errors.

[gemini-code-assist]

A high-severity Prompt Injection vulnerability exists here: the risk_manager_node function constructs an LLM prompt by directly embedding unsanitized content from the state object, including reports like market_research_report and fundamentals_report. This allows an attacker to inject malicious instructions and manipulate trading decisions. While the change on line 14 fixes a bug, it is part of this vulnerable data flow. Additionally, the current state access using [] can lead to KeyError if keys are missing; consider using .get() for more robust state access.