Skip to content

Conversation

@loganaden
Copy link

No description provided.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @loganaden, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request primarily focuses on enhancing the security posture of the project by upgrading a critical dependency. The update specifically targets a known vulnerability, ensuring that the application benefits from the latest security patches and protections.

Highlights

  • Security Vulnerability Fix: This pull request updates the chainlit dependency from version >=2.5.5 to >=2.9.4 to mitigate the security vulnerability identified as CVE-2026-22218.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request updates the chainlit dependency to version >=2.9.4 in pyproject.toml, presumably to address the security vulnerability mentioned in the title (CVE-2026-22218). While the change in pyproject.toml is correct, I have identified a critical issue with inconsistent dependency management across the project. Dependencies are also specified in requirements.txt and setup.py, but they are not aligned with pyproject.toml. This could lead to an older, vulnerable version of chainlit being installed, nullifying the security fix. It is crucial to consolidate dependency management into a single source of truth, preferably pyproject.toml, to ensure the application is secure.

"akshare>=1.16.98",
"backtrader>=1.9.78.123",
"chainlit>=2.5.5",
"chainlit>=2.9.4",

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

critical

While updating the version here is correct, this change might not be sufficient to fix the vulnerability across all installation methods. The project dependencies are defined in multiple files (pyproject.toml, requirements.txt, setup.py) and they are inconsistent:

  • requirements.txt lists chainlit without a version, which could install an older, vulnerable version.
  • setup.py does not list chainlit in its install_requires at all.

This means the security fix will only be applied if dependencies are installed using a modern tool that reads pyproject.toml. To ensure the vulnerability is patched reliably, it is critical to consolidate dependency management. I recommend making pyproject.toml the single source of truth and either removing requirements.txt and setup.py's dependency lists or ensuring they are generated from pyproject.toml.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant