Release 23.2: UpstreamPathTemplate doesn't contain the same placeholders in DownstreamPathTemplate

[ggnaegi]

Expected Behavior / New Feature

It should be possible to specify the placeholders freely. You might want to transform the parameters - by using a delegating handler - before calling the downstream services.

Actual Behavior / Motivation for New Feature

Ocelot throws an exception if upstream path template doesn't contain the same placeholders as downstream path template. It's a new validation introduced in Release 23.2.0. It's a breaking change with some bad side effects.

• #683 Validate placeholder duplicates in path templates #1927

I'm using a delegating handler to transform some upstream route parameters before calling the downstream service. eg. upstream: api/v1/service/endpoint/{upParam1}/{upParam2} -> downstream api/v1/internal-service/endpoint/{downParam}. It was working like a charm, since Release 23.2.0 it's not possible anymore.

Workaround would be to add some dummy query parameters to the upstream path, but I think it's misleading.

Besides, this code part https://github.com/AlyHKafoury/Ocelot/blob/11916b6672c6ee8330cab04e1545ed6dfeb5dcfe/src/Ocelot/Configuration/Validator/FileConfigurationFluentValidator.cs#L45-L50
is clearly out of PR scope.

Steps to Reproduce the Problem

1. Create an ocelot configuration file with an upstream route that does not contain the same placeholders as the downstream route. Ocelot will throw an exception during startup.

Specifications

• Version: 23.2.0

[raman-m]

@ggnaegi
Thanks for reporting!
What environment did you catch the problem in? Production or development?

And, first of all, show the code of your delegating handler please.

[ggnaegi]

No, unfortunately, I can't show you the delegating handler code. I catched the problem on staging environment.

[ggnaegi]

As mentioned, there are plenty of possible use cases where you could end up with the placeholders not matching. It's quite obvious in my opinion.

[raman-m]

In my opinion this is not so obvious.
I don't see delegation handler code or overridden services in DI. Impossible to advise or discuss what is hidden.
It's very strange to report a problem and then talk about the code being closed.

Our project is an open source project ❗

All discussions and source code should be publicly available.

[ggnaegi]

I don't want to argue about this any longer, thanks. I think we have added to much validation there, that's it. I will come back with a new PR later.

[raman-m]

🤯 🤣

No, we will continue to search for an ideal solutions...
This is our destiny!