Skip to content

Conversation

@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Contributor

Optimizes StatsService to perform SUM aggregations for reading minutes and pages directly in the database, avoiding loading large datasets into memory. Uses existing GetTotalMinutesAsync repository method and direct DbContext access for pages sum, following established patterns.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 14777551252098779145 started by @Tr1sma

💡 What:
- Optimized `GetTotalMinutesReadAsync` to use `IReadingSessionRepository.GetTotalMinutesAsync` (DB-side SUM).
- Optimized `GetTotalPagesReadAsync` to use `_unitOfWork.Context.Set<Book>().SumAsync` (DB-side SUM).

🎯 Why:
- Previously, these methods loaded ALL reading sessions or ALL completed books into memory to calculate a simple sum.
- This caused unnecessary memory allocation and data transfer (N+1-like issue for large datasets).

📊 Impact:
- Reduces memory usage and database IO by performing aggregation in SQL.
- Scales O(1) in terms of application memory vs O(n) previously.

🔬 Measurement:
- Verified correctness with `StatsServicePerformanceTests`.
- Verified existence of `GetTotalMinutesAsync` in `IReadingSessionRepository`.
@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Contributor Author

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@Tr1sma Tr1sma marked this pull request as ready for review January 9, 2026 13:15
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings January 9, 2026 13:15
@Tr1sma Tr1sma merged commit 3f23ef6 into main Jan 9, 2026
1 check failed
@Tr1sma Tr1sma deleted the bolt/optimize-stats-service-14777551252098779145 branch January 9, 2026 13:16
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR optimizes the StatsService by performing database-side aggregation for reading statistics instead of loading entire datasets into memory. This addresses performance concerns when dealing with large numbers of books and reading sessions.

Key Changes:

  • GetTotalMinutesReadAsync now uses the existing repository method GetTotalMinutesAsync instead of loading all sessions
  • GetTotalPagesReadAsync uses direct DbContext access with SumAsync instead of loading all completed books
  • New performance tests added to verify correctness of the optimized implementations

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File Description
BookLoggerApp.Infrastructure/Services/StatsService.cs Optimized two methods to use database-side SUM aggregation with helpful inline comments
BookLoggerApp.Tests/Services/StatsServicePerformanceTests.cs Added new test file with tests verifying correctness of both optimized aggregation methods
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

BookLoggerApp.Infrastructure/Services/StatsService.cs:240

  • Both branches of this 'if' statement write to the same variable - consider using '?' to express intent better.
        if (category.HasValue)
        {
            // Sort by specific category
            sortedBooks = category.Value switch
            {
                RatingCategory.Characters => books.Where(b => b.CharactersRating.HasValue).OrderByDescending(b => b.CharactersRating),
                RatingCategory.Plot => books.Where(b => b.PlotRating.HasValue).OrderByDescending(b => b.PlotRating),
                RatingCategory.WritingStyle => books.Where(b => b.WritingStyleRating.HasValue).OrderByDescending(b => b.WritingStyleRating),
                RatingCategory.SpiceLevel => books.Where(b => b.SpiceLevelRating.HasValue).OrderByDescending(b => b.SpiceLevelRating),
                RatingCategory.Pacing => books.Where(b => b.PacingRating.HasValue).OrderByDescending(b => b.PacingRating),
                RatingCategory.WorldBuilding => books.Where(b => b.WorldBuildingRating.HasValue).OrderByDescending(b => b.WorldBuildingRating),
                _ => Enumerable.Empty<Book>()
            };
        }
        else
        {
            // Sort by average rating
            sortedBooks = books
                .Where(b => b.AverageRating.HasValue)
                .OrderByDescending(b => b.AverageRating ?? 0);
        }

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants