fix: use watfaq-rustls instead of patched one

[VendettaReborn]

🤔 This is a ...

• Code style optimization

🔗 Related issue link

#733

💡 Background and solution

• rename rustls into watfaq-rustls, rename tokio-rustls into tokio-watfaq-rustls

[Itsusinn]

can this a be small crate？we can use
rustls = { path =... package = watfaq-rustls } in its cargo.toml without chaning its imports

[VendettaReborn]

can this a be small crate？we can use rustls = { path =... package = watfaq-rustls } in its cargo.toml without chaning its imports

you mean replace rustls with watfaq-rustls with this declare of package = "watfaq-rustls" but not let them co-exist? this approach won't compile

[VendettaReborn]

binary size increase on my x86 linux.

$ /usr/bin/ls -al ./target/release/clash-rs # before
-rwxr-xr-x 2 root root 15448224 Feb 24 17:30 ./target/release/clash-rs

$ /usr/bin/ls -al ./target/release/clash-rs # after
-rwxr-xr-x 2 root root 15757672 Feb 24 17:25 ./target/release/clash-rs

[Itsusinn]

can this a be small crate？we can use rustls = { path =... package = watfaq-rustls } in its cargo.toml without chaning its imports

you mean replace rustls with watfaq-rustls with this declare of package = "watfaq-rustls" but not let them co-exist? this approach won't compile

nope package=.... Is some kinda of alias

[VendettaReborn]

i know, but since it's only used by shadow-tls, i donnot think it necessary to use the alias. better to keep the usage explicit, i think.

[ibigbug]

ty! this should help us avoid potential issues upgrading tls and dealing with crates that has rustls as a dependenty